As I understand it, Simon's question is not about whether disfellowshipping as practiced by JWs is humane.
Simon's theory (by his own admission, a huge, sweeping generalization not applicable to every individual circumstance, one that he offered for exploration and comments) is:
Ex-JWs who were kicked out (more specifically, disfellowshipped legitimately, i.e. in compliance with accepted Watchtower Society rules) appear to be more obsessive longer (e.g. 20+ years after being DFed, still defining oneself as an ex-JW, friends and associates are mainly ex-JWs, inability to let go.)
Ex-JWs who decided to walk away seem more grounded and thoughtful. Once their questions have been answered and they've received immediate support, these let go and move on. They do not define themselves as ex-JWs years after leaving.
An even simpler version might be to ask--What causes some ex-JWs to remain obsessively involved in the ex-JW world long after leaving the JWs?
I haven't seen a clear-cut difference between DFed ex-JWs and walk-away ex-JWs. I do think a lot hinges on how one views the experience. If we see ourselves as helpless victims, the hurt, anger, and feelings of betrayal last a long time. We're bitter. We want revenge. We want justice. We want to talk to others who understand our traumatic experience.
Being able to let go is about forgiveness. We forgive ourselves for our own choices. We forgive ourselves for the harm we may have caused others. We forgive those who may have influenced our decisions. Once we're able to forgive, we can move on to asking, "How can I prevent this from happening to myself and others in the future?"
I was a child when my parents became Jehovah's Witnesses. I realize now that they did the best they could with the knowledge they had at the time. In the chaotic world of the late 60's, they were looking for hope, structure, and a sense of security.
I chose to continue as a JW as an adult. In the "Eyes Wide Shut" thread started by Amnesian, my eyes were opened to my own share of responsibility in the choice. I was not a helpless victim. I had wanted easy answers. I had wanted the hope of immortal life in paradise. I lacked critical thinking skills and did not investigate the Society. I had chosen to give my power away. I had chosen to submit to the Watchtower rules.
When I first discovered that the Watchtower Society tells lies, it was easy to be angry at Brooklyn and to want to "topple the Tower." As time went on, I remembered that most of the JWs in my congregation were good, well-meaning people who were just as duped as I was. I've read stories here of folks at Bethel who were also good and well-intentioned. Ray Franz was a member of the Governing Body for several years and thought he was helping. Which men are to blame? Who are the bad guys? Which ones are deliberately evil?
I agree with HillaryStep that 'large organizations can be sociopathic in nature: no conscience, no feeling, no individuality, just a machine that grinds away focused on one objective.' I hope we figure out how to straitjacket organizations like these so they cannot harm themselves and others.
Why are some ex-JWs obsessed with the ex-JW world long after leaving? Here are some more ideas:
- After being smothered by rules as a JW, we afterwards react strongly to authority figures, especially those we perceive as arbitrary or unfair. Moderated discussion boards provide perfect target practice.
- It's easier to be a reactionary, to rebel against something, than to work for positive change or to create something new.
- In the ex-JW world, we can reprise familiar personas and roles: the wise elder, the self-sacrificing sister, the brother who always did research, the congregation clown.
- Whatever motivation lured us to the JW world keeps playing out in the ex-JW world: needing to feel a little better and smarter than someone else, craving for community, wanting to lecture or harangue, wanting to help, need for attention, a wish to love and understand.
Ginny