My theory about the behavior and obsession of some ex-JWs

by Simon 135 Replies latest jw friends

  • GinnyTosken
    GinnyTosken

    willyloman,

    I wasn't totally ignored. After all, SixofNine did recall his motivations for attending the Kingdom Hall.

    After my post on this thread, I was mulling over HillaryStep's thought that large organizations can be sociopathic. Coincidentally, while reading a book called Simple Prosperity by David Wann, I came across this paragraph:

    For example, former New York attorney Robert Hinkley has drafted twenty-eight words--a "do-no-harm" clause--that he believes should be inserted into all corporate charters. This clause would take away CEO's chronic excuse for antisocial, antienvironmental behavior: that they are just "serving their shareholders."

    Here is the clause, a "Code of Corporate Citizenship." The twenty-eight words are bolded.

    The duty of directors henceforth shall be to make money for shareholders but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, public health and safety, dignity of employees, and the welfare of the communities in which the company operates .

    This could be easily adapted for non-profit corporations, too.

    I'll also share two quotations cited in Wann's book:

    I'm not sure if my involvement in causes, benefits, marches, and demonstrations has made a huge difference, but I know one thing: that involvement has connected me with the good people: people with the live hearts, the live eyes, the live heads. --Pete Seeger

    You never change something by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. --Buckminster Fuller

    Ginny

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    Still sore about your "CaptainKoons" account being banned at MoChat?

    How come you're over here doing the wet work instead of your boss? I'm sure he's got a few accounts to burn.

  • CunningMan
    CunningMan

    I wouldn't say that I'm sore. Sore is too strong a word. Annoyed is more appropriate. I liked that name "CaptainKoons." Anyway, I have another account I can browse with.

    Boss? Please, we're friends who chat and goof off on yahoo messenger. Besides, EF always described any kind of organized effort as "herding cats." Regardless of how you imagine the posters over at you-know-where, it's not like some para-military group. How is operation chaos?

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    God how I hate wasting my time talking to the help. But you're trying so hard to be a good little Elderette so I'll give you something to go start 50 more 'Bendrr' threads about at JWO.

    I heard about what your boss had to say about "operation chaos" and just had to laugh. Smart as he is, he just can't help but act like a dumbass sometimes. You see, he didn't read anything of the sort at my board because he doesn't have an account there. Guests can't read anything beyond the main page, so he never saw any threads if he even went to my board at all.

    Nice try, kid.

  • CunningMan
    CunningMan

    And how can you be so certain that he can't view your board? It's not that hard. Either get a fake account or talk to someone who can view your board.

  • Bendrr
    Bendrr

    <sigh!>

    He doesn't have an account there, kiddo. Sorry but he's not the god you think he is.

    And he doesn't have anyone he can ask to give him access, like he does at MoChat. (oh yes, we know who his mole there is)

  • CunningMan
    CunningMan

    If you say so. No point in continuing the yes-he-does-no-he-doesn't routine. And I don't doubt that you know of one of the moles there, but there are a lot more than you think. However, it's been a bore over at No Chat. Not surprising considering the high quality posters you've got, like Celty.

  • Robdar
    Robdar

    I think your theory has merit. It may also be that some people are just unhappy ass monkeys.

  • mouthy
    mouthy

    Hillary is one of the of the most entertaining posters you will read on JWD

    Well here I go to upset your favorite poster.... I DO NOT Agree! He is the one person I will ever have the misfortune to meet. I dont know weather he is a she or a he. but I think he/she is extremly puffed up & rude. Dont bother HS to berate me.... I usually skip your rude posts.

  • Gerard
    Gerard

    Hillari, you are almost there! Getting the last word TLW TM means that you win the debate. It also shows your moral superiority, and willingness to stand your ground. This should convince your opponent that you are correct, and will certainly impress your fellows.

    It is particularly important to get the last word where you are in some doubts as to the merits of your case. The last word will serve as a clinching argument that will make up for any deficiencies in your logic. Achieving the last word now also brings the advantage that you may subsequently point to your success in this debate as the clinching argument in future debates. However, if you did not win the last discussion, I still recommend claiming incessantly that you did.

    If your opponent attempts to seize the last word for themselves, be careful to point out the folly of this strategy, perhaps citing this post. This clever technique allows you to simultaneously regain the last word for yourself while making any sort of reply from your opponent seem in bad faith.

    Cheers,

    GF

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit