Perhaps we should all step back a bit.
At this time there is no emergency involving the use of a blood transfusion.
There is a man that now knows that the WTS is not what it claimed to be, and he does not want to be a JW anymore.
One cruel mark of this religion is that it rips families apart. We agree that this is cruel. Then let's not all rush to want this to happen in this case.
We are talking about a very, very small child. We are talking about a mother. I happen to be one.
If anyone had tried to take my five month old daughter away from me, I would have fought tooth and toenail. I nursed my baby and at five months she was having no other nourishment but me. She was a baby who was "attached to me." Picture someone trying to take her "for her betterment."
Why would anyone on this forum want this to happen?
Why should a tiny child suffer being used as a pawn in a parental fight?
I like to welcome new posters also, but I like to be reasonable. A baby needs its mother. He doesn't say the child is neglected...he doesnt' say the child is in immediate danger.
I am sure I do not have all the facts. Neither do any of you reading this.
I do not like to see fatherless children.....but I certainly don't like to see motherless ones, either.
I think this new poster needs to calm down and calmly discuss what is best for a TINY BABY at this time. Compromise is called for. If there is joint custody, then his say has medical weight, also.