God my head hurts when I read these kind of debates.
It is a stalemate, clear and simple, and I will tell you why:
God is always described as outside of our plain of existance. He is always described as omnipotent.
One either believes that this a true position held by someone or something, or you do not.
The reason you would not is the same reason you would believe it, becuase you don't understand it.
The believers say because God cannot be understood that you have to have faith that he can do things that are past the intellectual capacity of ourselves. The non-believers say that because God cannot be understood that he cannot exist because he doesn't fit in any category in our universe (logic, reason, science etc).
So the debate goes as follows:
Non-Believer: The Bible says God does X and X doesn't make any sense because of Y and Z
Believer: I believe X is true because I have faith in X and it makes sense to me. I do not think Y and Z are valid to disprove X
This debate is a stalemate. Each party cannot tell the other what they do and do no believe regardless of supporting points.