surely you're not suggesting we lay back and let the Islamofreakos bomb the crap out of our Country and do nothing about it because of the sins of Europeans nearly 1,000 years ago, are you?
Certainly not, dear Daddy-O (peace to you!). Personally, I am of the school that nobody should be bombing anybody. For any reason. Especially when it means uninvolved women, children, and the elderly are the true casualities. But not all Muslims are approving, any more than all "christians" approve the retaliation.
And the sins of 1,000 years ago isn't really why most of those involved did it, is it? True, some of them were/are talked into thinking it was "jihad" (well, "we've" kind of fueled THAT fire, now, haven't "we"?)... but that really was just a "tool" used by the promoters and implementers to get young, stoopid, testerone-driven, so let me at them 70 (or is it 72?) virgins... hot-headed guys... and the young, stoopid girls who love them... to blow stuff up. Including themselves. I mean, it isn't like there's a lot of OLD Muslim men and women running around with C4 strapped to their torsoes.
And, besides, the "school" of "we did nothing wrong to them, how dare they attack us" thinking is a bit offbase, wouldn't you say? I mean, there are at least two other schools, at least... that say different.
One is that the attack was actually retaliation for what "Americans/Europeans" have gone around the world doing for centuries, and even more recently, taking valuable natural resources (like starting in the 40's and 50's when our INCREASING ENERGY CONSUMPTION... and fear of running out of "our" OWN oil... so "we" began to GREEIDLY stockpile "our" own so that "we" can charge "them" the price of a firstborn when "theirs" runs out... called for it)... from weaker nations for pennies, heck, rocks... on the acre/lot/barrel... so long as it supports "our way of life"... the "way of life" for the weaker nation be damned...
Or... that it really was nothing more than a distraction... with only a "few" casualties and since they were civilians, who really cares pay their families and be done with it... but now we have the presence in Iraq we NEED ('cause someone's got to do something about that Iran, 'cause, like China and North Korea, they ain't bowin' down to "us" and OUR "way of life", either!)... which presence Saddam Hussein (that no account "and-after-all-we-did-for-you-heck-you-wouldn't-have-even-been-in-office-if-it-weren't-for-us-so-what-do-you-mean-no-well-we'll-see-about-that-'cause-we-put-you-in-so-we'll-take-you-out... ingrate) refused to give, and look where HE is now...
American "hands" aren't clean around the world, dear one. They've never been clean... and you know this... because you're not a stoopid man, by any stretch. "They" just SAY their hands are clean... and "we" believe "them." Because we covet our "peace and security." Let the governments duke it out, so long as no one comes HERE. But if anyone's been paying attention, they know better. They may not like what they know... but they know.
Nobody should be bombing anybody. Or killing women, children, and elderly folks who have nothing to do with it. On either side.
As always, I bid you peace!
YOUR servant, friend, and a slave of Christ,
Shel
P.S. Some of the most peaceful people I know are Muslims (rachafracha formatting!). I have to say, however, that that "70 virgin" thing doesn't seem very bright to ME - I mean, one tryst... and she's no longer a virgin. Right? So, what, you blow yourself up for 70 rides on the merry-go-round? One ride a day... and you're through in, what, less than 3 months? What is paradisical about THAT?? And what do you do for the REST of "eternity"? (Shaking head) Someone isn't thinking. At least, not with their head. Well, I mean... not with the RIGHT head...