Scholar has said that the Bible alone proves 607 and that Faruli is gravy. I have been waiting for a year now for Scholar to step up to the plate. For all his bluster, he is just a windbag.
H. Hunger Reviews R. Furuli's "Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian Chronology, Volume II"
by AnnOMaly 248 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
-
scholar
AnnOMaly
Post 1521
I think you should take your own medicine by satnding aside, observe and understand before commenting on matters in which you have no expertise.
I believe that I can say with conviction that Furuli has proved the existence of the 'Babylonian Gap' but it is for other independent scholars who must have sufficient technical expertise to test Furuli's hypothesis. To date this has not been done.
Yes I can. I am fully competent in making an assessment bringing to the debate matters which lie within my area of competence. Comparing Furuli's study with earlier ones is rather easy for me to do. You mention in your stupidity that the earliest study by Weidner and Neugebauer is in German. That is correct but what you forget in your muddleheadness is that I informed this forum some years ago that it was 'scholar' in conjunction with a SDA theological library in Australia way back in the seventies a transllation from German to English by a Lecturer in Gerrman from the University of Sydney.
I will bring matters to this forum on my terms, manner and timing and not yours.
scholar JW
-
isaacaustin
LOL Pseudoscholar you are a total joke.
-
thetrueone
One thing that Scholar proves is yes a probable occurrence of intellectual disingenuous can and will appear once a person has been
solemnly identified as a true interpreter of the bible via a select religious organization.
-
isaacaustin
Yes, pseudcoscholar is a valuable case in point there.
-
OUTLAW
I simply do not have the expertise in examining the minutae of Furul's research and Hunger's review.....Scholar
I believe that I can say with conviction that Furuli has proved the existence of the 'Babylonian Gap'.....Scholar
?..
.............................
...OUTLAW -
Mad Dawg
"Scholar", If you are such an expert on the Bible, why are you ducking my questions?? I most honestly wish to know how you can prove it from the Bible alone.
-
isaacaustin
I simply do not have the expertise in examining the minutae of Furul's research and Hunger's review.....Scholar
I believe that I can say with conviction that Furuli has proved the existence of the 'Babylonian Gap'.....Scholar
?..
Psuedoscholar, If you have no expertise in examining Furuli's research how can you say with conviction that Furuli proved the existance of the "Babylonian gap'? Are you on drugs?
-
AnnOMaly
Neil,
I think you should take your own medicine by satnding aside, observe and understand before commenting on matters in which you have no expertise.
I do not pontificate on matters that I do not understand. The linguistic side is certainly Hunger's and Furuli's domain. I do, however, understand a certain amount of the astronomical side as I have taken the trouble to do some research and check Furuli's claims. You, on the other hand, refuse to do anything in that regard!
I believe that I can say with conviction that Furuli has proved the existence of the 'Babylonian Gap' but it is for other independent scholars who must have sufficient technical expertise to test Furuli's hypothesis. To date this has not been done.
Your 'conviction' is nothing more than white noise as you do not have the 'expertise,' or even enough amateur autodidacticism, to the weigh the merits or demerits of anything about Furuli's hypothesis!
Yes I can. I am fully competent in making an assessment bringing to the debate matters which lie within my area of competence.
You alleged that your area of competence was in the Bible. As Hunger answers Furuli on linguistic and astronomical grounds, and you say you are incompetent to assess these areas of debate, then you have nothing of value to contribute with regard to this Review.
Comparing Furuli's study with earlier ones is rather easy for me to do. You mention in your stupidity that the earliest study by Weidner and Neugebauer is in German. That is correct ...
Now I'm stupid for correctly pointing something out? LOL.
... but what you forget in your muddleheadness is that I informed this forum some years ago that it was 'scholar' in conjunction with a SDA theological library in Australia way back in the seventies a transllation from German to English by a Lecturer in Gerrman from the University of Sydney.
All 90 or so pages? Then your earlier erroneous claims about the study are all the more astonishing.
I will bring matters to this forum on my terms, manner and timing and not yours.
Suuuure you will.
"Suddenly .... nothing happened." LOL!
-
scholar
AnnOMaly
Post 1523
It is said that 'a little knowledge is dangerous' so I believe that you are well advised to take up your concerns with Furuli directly. If I have some concerns then I will most certainly communicate such with Furuli directly.
My conviction of Furuli's proof of the Babylobian Gap is well established by Bible chronology so I can quite ably defend the matter.
No I can make an assessment of not only Hunger's review but also Jonsson's 5 part series. My assessment is one of collusion and desperation.
Your stupidity lies not in the fact of the matter but that of rashly ignoring what I had originally said about VAT 4956 and my activities surrounding it.
scholar JW
