Darthfader:
"Just say the US did decide to legislate reduced greenhouse gasses on a wide scale. How effective would this globally given that other countries are "coming into their own" as far as producers of greenhouse gases. What would be the impact on american business and it's ability to compete with the other countries who dont have these regulations in place."
If we were to take drastic action to radically reduce fossil fuel consumption-and mind you, most people who think they know something about the issue don't have a clue as to what radical is-then we would be rewarded by having our teeth kicked in by Human distorted Nature.
If we were to do nothing, or take the token actions that Obama suggests, then we will still have our teeth kicked in (By the Arctic meltdown) and sometime later we will have our skulls smashed in by other disturbances.
The reason for that is because if we were to stop burning all fossil fuels today, we would still not be able to stop the Arctic ice cap from shrinking, exposing more ocean and altering our weather for the worse. The consequences are to crops like the recent damage to Canada's wheat harvest due to intense rains. We're going to get more of that.
Furthermore, if we stopped releasing more Carbon Dioxide today, we would still be due for another 1F increase in Global Temperatures, within the next 30 years, on top of the 1.4F we've had since pre-industrial times.
That's our teeth getting smashed in.
So we have the choice of taking radical action right now to prevent catastrophes decades from now and taking emergency measures, such as stockpiling food, to prepare for the inevitable disasters in the coming years.
So go ahead and do nothing.
Bottom line, it is imbecilic to talk nonsense about competing with other nations when devastation after devastation is going to rob everyone of this-and it is worthy of destruction-psychopathic economy. We don't live to work we work to live. F*ck Mammon!
Villabolo