Climate Chaos Cultists don't like it when you mock their foolish political agenda.
Raise taxes and save the planet!
Bread and circuses, but without the bread, and no elephants.
The Caliphate will straighten everything out. Allahu, y'all!
by Nathan Natas 86 Replies latest jw friends
Climate Chaos Cultists don't like it when you mock their foolish political agenda.
Raise taxes and save the planet!
Bread and circuses, but without the bread, and no elephants.
The Caliphate will straighten everything out. Allahu, y'all!
Mindless parrots don't like it when people and the rest of reality doesn't fit into their corporate shaped ideological worldview. Nature doesn't give a turd for the delusions Homo Imbecilitas and their meaningless political parrot squawks.
SQUAWK: "Climate Chaos Cultists don't like it when you mock their foolish political agenda."
"Raise taxes and save the planet!"
I don't believe in cap and trade, which, by the way was invented by Ronald Reagan to control chloroflourocarbons and reduce the damage to the Ozone layer. The climate situation is too far gone for that. I was simply discussing the natural mechanics of what was happening.
Not that a morally and intellectually bankrupt coward has the courage to discuss the facts that I presented earlier. As I previously said, they have no capacity to comprehend basic facts and logic so they stick pins and needles into their magical Al Gore voodoo doll and wish the thunderclouds away.
As far as raising taxes for RICH parasitical scum who feed off the rest of Humanity, don't bother. Shoot them in the head instead.
But it's not about taxes per se to the morally and intellectually bankrupt; it's about their personal irresponsibility and their inability to sacrifice anything for a future that they're too gutless to accept.
So be it. Why should such a cancer as the current Humanity be allowed to spread like gangrene throughout the Galaxy? It's better that Subhumanity destroy itself. A redemption will come when...never mind "pearls to swine".
Squawk: Nathan wants a cracker!
Villabolo
A James Thurber Fable
The Scotty Who Knew Too Much
Several summers ago there was a Scotty who went to the country for a visit. The Scotty was contemptuous of the farm dogs he met. These dogs were afraid of a creature they encountered that had a white stripe down its back. The aggressive Scotty announced that he would take the creature on. "Don't you want to ask any questions about him?" a farm dog asked. "Naw," said the Scotty, "you ask the questions."
Undeterred by a squirting and the odoriferous result, the Scotty was soon ready to confront another animal all the farm dogs were afraid of. "Don't you want to ask any questions about him?" a farm dog asked. "Naw," says the Scotty, "just show me where he hangs out." The farm dog showed the Scotty where the animal lived, and within moments, the farm dog was pulling quills out of the Scotty.
Infuriated, the Scotty announced that he had now learned how to fight in the country and would beat up the farm dog. He held his nose with one front paw to ward off squirts and odors and covered his eyes with the other to keep out quills. "The Scotty couldn't see his opponent and he couldn't smell his opponent and he was so badly beaten that he had to be taken back to the city and put in a nursing home."
"Moral: It is better to ask some of the questions than to know all the answers."
Villabolo
Villabolo,
Thank you for the explaination.
So basically you are saying were going to get hit with more significant natural disasters regardless of what we do because it's too late to take corrective action?
Climate Chaos Cultists don't like it when you mock their foolish political agenda.
Raise taxes and save the planet!
Bread and circuses, but without the bread, and no elephants.
The Caliphate will straighten everything out. Allahu, y'all!
I think this says it all. Nathan simply does not argue from scientific evidence, but from the perspective of a giant conspiracy theory.
yawn. if you have some actual scientific evidence you can formulate in an argument im all-ears, but if you want to convince me by loaded language, trigger phrases and appeal to ultimate consequences, im not listening.
Darthfader:
"So basically you are saying were going to get hit with more significant natural disasters regardless of what we do because it's too late to take corrective action?"
NO! What I clearly said was that if we take drastic action now we'll get "kicked in the teeth". If we don't take drastic action now, we'll get our skulls smashed in. You do realize the relative difference between the two?
Having the prospect of getting your skull smashed in should make you look forward to taking corrective action and merely spitting your teeth out.
Villabolo
Not going to get into an emotional discussion about this... frankly I have too much going on in my life right now, and I don't have the time or energy to debate this issue. I thought you might find the videos on this website interesting. Richard Lintzen,PHD is a well known Professor of Climatology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
I have exchanged emails with Richard on this subject.
Coffee
Villabolo, where is that image from? Is it a compilation of data from weather stations, or from satelites? Satelite data tends to be much more accurate because there aren't the extensive coverage problems that one finds with weather stations.
And what does any of what you said have to do with CO2 in the atmosphere? Are we to simultaneously assume that a) CO2 is unable to diffuse at some relatively even level throughout the entire atmosphere in the same way that any soluble compound will do in a fluid, and b) that even though it is unable to diffuse throughout the atmosphere, it somehow travels very, very far from its source of origin?
And even then, of what relevance is the fact that the arctic is "warmer than normal"? The artic temps are still WELL below the freezing point of water...
The above is the link to
Global Warming:
( Climate Models and the Evidence?)
How to approach the science .
Richard S. Lindzen
Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Testimony: House Subcommittee
on Science and Technology hearing on
A Rational Discussion of Climate Change: the Science, the Evidence, the Response
November 17, 2010
Coffee
:Bohm, Villa, you are wasting your time with these morons.
Great argument. Worthy of you and your rapier sharp mind.
No, wait! That DEFINES your rapier sharp mind, with a ton of oxidation added in, that is. Not to mention petrification.
Farkel