NUKES: THE ULTIMATE WEAPON OF TERROR

by You Know 86 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • GinnyTosken
    GinnyTosken
    Jehovah's pre-recorded word is what determines the final outcome of events and He has already called the finale from the beginning.

    Wouldn't this make Jehovah and his pre-recorded word the ultimate weapon of terror?

    See also:

    "Terrorism Strikes Egypt"


    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.asp?id=19931&site=3#247038

    YouKnow quotes Proverbs 1:26-28:

    . . . I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when panic strikes you . . .
    Compare Proverbs 17:5:

    . . . those who are glad at calamity will not go unpunished.
    This means that Jehovah is gonna have to spank himself--unless, of course, he would prefer that Think41self do it.

    How long, O simple one, will you love being simple?

    Ginny

  • dubla
    dubla
    When it gets right down to it what CAN a ridiculer do, but...well...ridicule? / You Know

    it always amuses me to see the single biggest ridiculer on this forum claiming to be the victim of ridicule. i guess you reap what you sow, right yk? do unto others....blah blah.

    aa

  • dubla
    dubla

    ginny-

    Compare Proverbs 17:5:
    . . . those who are glad at calamity will not go unpunished.
    even more so, wouldn't this scripture have to apply to the doomsayers like yk, who jump on the forum laughing and cheering after every major disaster?

    aa

  • jayhawk1
    jayhawk1

    To echo what dubla said,

    You Know, cry me a river.

    Is this a light saber in my pocket or am I just happy to see you?

    "Hand me that whiskey, I need to consult the spirit."-J.F. Rutherford

  • GinnyTosken
    GinnyTosken

    Dubla,

    even more so, wouldn't this scripture have to apply to the doomsayers like yk, who jump on the forum laughing and cheering after every major disaster?
    I guess Think41self will just have to spank YouKnow, too--after she finishes with Jehovah, of course.

    Ginny

  • You Know
    You Know

    As an aside, due to the sheer enormity of money involved, the financial equivelant of the nuclear bomb are derivatives. One small detonation can bring the whole system down. A couple of weeks back, on the Triple Curve thread, one particularly hopelessly stupid fellow said he wouldn't believe in such things until he read them in "respectable" newspapers. Well, I don't think the New York Post ranks as a respectable newspaper, but they do seem to cater to those who are mentally challenged and marginally literate. So this article may help. / You Know

    Clich Here>>> http://www.nypost.com/business/40850.htm

  • Abaddon
    Abaddon

    Does this mean you given up on forecasting economic doom? And gone for 'Preparation H' instead?

    Stock markets still fairly okay? Some signs of recovery? Prophecy of financial doom unlikely to take place? Predict nuclear war!

    Okay, we have maybe four scenarios;

    Backback Terrorist; A 'suitcase' bomb is detonated in a major city, possibly a few at the same time. This would either be a educational strike (what the attack on the WTC was in the eyes of the people who did it), or extortion - a demonstration some where small and isolated, and a deadline. Even if the entire supposed stock of missing 'backpack' or 'suitcase' nuclear bombs (technicaly nuclear demolition charges) were used in this, the total yield would be arounf 50 kilotonnes; a backpack nuke is about 1kt equivalent.

    Thus, civilisation does not fall, but 50 cities have a small hole in them; we're not talking 5km wide craters and millions dead, we're talking about mass destruction of a quite defined area, and tens or hundreds of thoudsands of casualties at worst.

    Obviously that would be dreadful, but life would go on for those who still had it.

    Third world in-fighting; Nation a attacks nation b. At this point, the most likely one is India and Pakistan. Lots of people would die, but their limited capability (tens of warheads) would self-limit, and it is quite possible there would be world-wide backing for an educational nuclear strike on major troop concentrations of the participents by the Allied West, or a scheduled (time to evacuate) destruction of key cities. Civilisation does not end.

    Armagedon No, not the one with Bruce, or the one with god. Israel being attacked on mass by Arab nations, and turning their nuclear arsenal on every Arab city in range. Self-limiting. Civilaisation does not end.

    Strike by state A developing country might use nuclear weapons to strike at an enemy of greater size. Similar to 'Backpack Terrorist', but larger bombs. Messy, but civilaisation goes on.

    Option five, MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) is no longer available. Unless Jehober launches by divine power the combined arsenals of China, Russia, USA, UK and France, it ain't going to happen.

    In twenty years time there might be the possibility of the Allied West having to use nuclear weapons against the Chinese, but this is unlikely. COnventional war? Humans are still dumb enough for that, and as Bush has shown, it's good for business. Nuclear war is not good for business, and the Chinese are damn good business people; even if their ecomonic expansion is as great as some speculate, they don't want war.

    Thus, I think trying to scaremonger about nuclear war is as duff as financial scaremongering. It's unlikely, there's nothing you can do about it, and if you're majorly affected you'll probably not be aware of it.

    People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...

  • TR
    TR
    Jehovah's pre-recorded word is what determines the final outcome of events and He has already called the finale from the beginning. / You Know

    Ahhh....free will.

    TR

    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    --Benjamin Franklin, 1759

  • You Know
    You Know

    DUBULA snorts:

    it always amuses me to see the single biggest ridiculer on this forum claiming to be the victim of ridicule. i guess you reap what you sow, right yk? do unto others....blah blah.

    You are more than a little confused. I don't take any of your nonsense personally. The ridiculer that the Scritpure describes ridicules Jehovah and his word. My thread is a good example of the imbecilic mindset of just such an individual, in that a topic discussing the likelihood of nuclear war, in the context of Christ's prophecy about mankind being gripped with fear, is met with nonsensical ridicule. Even though it is directed at me, it is merely a reflection of one's attitude toward Jehovah God. Such a person deserves to be ridiculed for their embracing abject stupidity. That's why the Proverb I cited ealier addresses itself directly to mockers and ridiculers, where it says: "How long must you ridiculers desire for yourself outright ridicule, and how long will you stupid ones keep hating knowledge?" / You Know

  • dubla
    dubla

    yk-

    As an aside, due to the sheer enormity of money involved, the financial equivelant of the nuclear bomb are derivatives. One small detonation can bring the whole system down.
    ah yes, derivatives, derivatives, derivatives.....they are going to bring the system down, eventually...right? i mean, first its october, then new year, now what? when is this going to happen?

    arent the central banks supposed to be bankrupt by now? why do always refuse to answer this question? do you think ill forget about your prediction if you continue to ignore it? in your words, LOL.

    aa

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit