We believe that the world would be a better place when rid of spiritual imagination because of a simple, logical, idea.
Most religions contain another life, and that is the core of it's belief system. This takes away from the value of THIS life, a life that is the only life we have (the conclusion of every atheist on Earth).
Imagine every human being that has ever lived. Imagine the percentage of those human beings who were at one time or another part of a religion. Imagine the hours of just ONE person's life that they put into worship, prayer, and study.
Let's take the average Roman Catholic. A Roman Catholic usually attends church every Sunday, and prays before every meal, and sometimes before bed. Let's just take the mass on every Sunday. A Sunday mass is one hour. Multiply that hour by 52 weeks in the year. Let's say this Roman Catholic lives to a pretty normal age, let's say 80. Multiply the 52 hours per every week by 80. Divide that answer (4160 hours) by 24 and you will end up with about 173. 173 days (almost half a year) of someone's life has been utilized by the belief in a dogmatic religion. This excludes prayer and personal worship, as well as study. Now imagine this Catholic that has certain choices for what he can do in life, and one of them is to become a professor of philosophy. One who can publish his own work, one whom can possibly change the world, and yet he doesn't because it might question their faith (this actually happened to my grandmother, she took zero philosophy courses throught her college career for the same reason). What would've happened if he HAD become a philosophy professor, or if he had published philosophical works? We won't ever know. And this is just ONE person.
Think of the millions of priests, bishops, popes, deacons, and believers (billions really). Think of all the years, the hundreds of thousands of years spent on their religion. And then imagine that one day, we find one piece of evidence that disproves God. All of that wasted time that could've been spent on finding cures for horrid diseases (allowed by your deity), improving the contemporary technology of their time, but no, they went to church, studied their holy book, and prayed to their select man in the clouds.
The world WOULD be a better place then it is now. It is so logically probable that that statement is known to be fact in the world of science.
You act as if you've never actually thought about this. One who is so rigid in their beliefs that it is so absolute, that when questioned about it, interviewed, argued with, one resorts to acts of sarcasm and condescension, and THEN talks about how insulting a post was that was backed up by logical probabilities and scientific/historical fact? Ridiculous.