NC you are being too general. I never said that I don't say people are wrong, I said that I don't think EVERYBODY is wrong and I am right, which is what you accused me of. If my interpretation of Scripture is the opposite of someone elses then one is right and the other is wrong, that's just a fact of the situation at hand. However, this is not the only way it can work, some interpretations are compatible with each other, some are at odds, it's not as black and white as you are making it out to be. I am pretty tired of your miscomprehension, NC. Just read what you said here:
Well you use the argument that everyone else is wrong if they don't agree with your very particular interpretation of scripture. Have you noticed that?
When I think I am right and you hold the opposite opinion that means I think you are wrong, but only implicitly. I can be nice about it, not nice about it or just blunt. I never just think I am right for no reason, you should know by now that when I think I am right I back up what I say. My blanket statements have hidden appendixes. People with "teacher complex", such as yourself, will use their red pen whenever someone claims they are right instead of inquiring of the appendix which would answer questions. All you do on this forum is grade essays and frankly your methods leave much to be desired.
Here's the issue in a nutshell, so listen up, I am only going to say this once. You, and your people, are dysfunctionally fused with the scientific method and I am not. I truly believe that I, as a true believer, am more functional than you (because I believe I am doing what I was destined to do). I believe that proving something right, especially spiritual things, is just as valid a method as making a hypothesis and trying to prove it wrong. The former creates hope, the latter tears it down. I look at the scientific method as a tool that can be picked up and put back in the toolbox freely. I acknowledge that there is more than a single tool or else I wouldn't have a box. You, on the other hand, have literally fused with an inanimate force because you like security of "being consistant" as you say. It's offensive to me that you say I will believe something different next year, it's repulsive actually because it shows not only your gap of understanding in regards to me, it also shows that you are willing to preach it publically even though you know I would disagree. That's called doubling down on ignorance. You are never going to be able to repsect true believers because they will not bend to the will of the scientific method, you will have to kill us if you want to live in a world without God. We will fight until our very last breath. I think you are way out of your league.
-Sab
