Faith... and Trust: The Same Things?

by AGuest 452 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Benjie
    Benjie

    Guest, you have articulated exactly the process of thought that my wife and I have been going through.We both like what you say, with such intensity and sincerity too.

    New Chapter, in the congregations we have known, college education was condemned. We watched intelligent teenagers discouraged from pursuing their talents and interests, and taking up menial jobs while they wait for Armageddon, which was going to be just round the corner.

    Acting like anything above an 8th grade education is held in contempt is not accurate either.

    It was a very accurate description of what we saw happen over and over again.

    There is plenty wrong with the WT, but misrepresenting or blowing out of proportion what they stand for, just because you disrespect their beliefs, is a bit uncalled for.

    It sounded honest and accurate to me. The JW's we have known have indeed loved to read, but not anything that was disapproved of by the Watchtower. They were, in reality, victims of a mind-deadening system. New Chapter, why did you react so sharply and call Guest's interesting post harsh criticism? I really do not think it was.

  • cofty
    cofty

    I knew planty of JWs male and female who were intelligent and interesting people. Very few with formal higher education but I don't recognise AGuest's demeaning description of the average JW.

    What's 8th grade?

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    New Chapter, why did you react so sharply and call Guest's interesting post harsh criticism? I really do not think it was.

    Several reasons. First, she's talking about my friends (or ex-friends as the case may be). Painting them as nearly illiterate because they don't agree with her. And yet, there is much room for disagreement, unless it is a JW, then all bets are off. Second, if I were to ever suggest that Aguest is wrong because she has poor reading comprehension skills, not only would she blast me, but a core group of supporters would blast me too. Third, because I have noticed a strong double standard being applied. Fourth, it is not accurate. Your experience is different than my experience, and yet people are still JW's. Those with good reading skills and those without. Those that reach for higher education and those that do not. So it can't be a reading comprehension issue.

    And lastly, it is not about intelligence or education, although the more education the more likely a person is to be an atheist, there are still very intelligent and highly educated people that believe.

    It has been suggested to atheists here that not respecting beliefs is the same as not respecting the person. We disagree. We think that beliefs CAN be disrespected. However to suggest that those that don't believe as you do can't read properly, is worse than just disrespecting their beliefs. In fact, the same things that make JW's believe as they do are the things that make you and others believe as you do.

    So when I hear that people I have known, bright, educated, well-spoken people being painted as ignoramuses, that bothers me. They are misled. I think you are misled too. Does that give me the right to question your intelligence? Attack their beliefs all you wish. Mourn the loss of higher education, if you wish. Bash the blood issue--go ahead. Fair game. But there is no need to get so personal with a people that are just like you---acting on what they have faith in.

    Or are JW's fair game?

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    What's 8th grade?

    13/14 year olds.

  • EntirelyPossible
    EntirelyPossible

    What's 8th grade?

    The lowest pit of hell for adolescent self-esteem.

  • cofty
    cofty

    Thanks.

    NC - PM

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    Back at you, Cofty

  • AGuest
    AGuest
    you wrote this to me... "He is the stone over which many... many... perhaps including yourself... stumble". You made it a topic of discussion.

    Well, I didn't emphasize it, but okay... I can give you that.

    So you will change what you say until it means whatever you want? Initially it was getting hit by the object, now it's tripping over it?

    Hmmmm... let's see. I first stated:

    "... you could be standing still and have something come [rapidly] toward you. You weren't paying attention, though... until right when it was upon you. You start to move/step/jump out of the way... but not fast or soon enough."

    Then I stated:

    "If you're standing still and the object hits you, yes. If you try to get out of its way... and trip (over it... or perhaps over your own feet)/almost fall doing so... that is stumbling..."

    What did I change?

    Still doesn't jive, getting hit by a Jesus moving at high speeds towards you when you aren't moving isn't stumbling.

    When you aren't moving, yes. But, please see both of my statements, restated above.

    You're just saying whatever sounds like it might be in any way plausible to make you sounds right.

    Well, no... I was trying to help you "see" what stumbling includes. That you still don't/can't/won't isn't on me.

    So....yeah, still here.

    Cool. I always enjoy our interchanges... until you start playing to the crowd (of usual suspects). Then you just disappoint me. Because I know you're (much) more intelligent than that. I remember "when"... even if some of the more recent folks don't.

    Wow. That's a pretty harsh criticism of JW's.

    Perhaps. But it's accurate, dear NC (peace to you... still). As someone said, "The truth hurts (sometimes)."

    Not my experience at all.

    Then you are the exception.

    Misled? Yes. But plenty that I knew went to college

    Again, you are the exception. You're also being dishonest again. That you're being so in favor of Jehovah's Witnesses, simply because you need to disagree with me is... interesting. Another attempt to change the flavor of this forum yet again: from "let's help JWs/exJWs who need it have a place to speak freely, on whatever topic"... to "this place was started for atheists" (although nothing could be further from the truth)... now to "Many JWs are well-read and college-educated." Please... stop it.

    and some were quite bright and loved to read.

    Now THAT I agree with. SOME were... and did. Absolutely. I never said otherwise (although the choice in reading material for some of those who "loved" to read doesn't necessarily go well with them on that - I mean, it does call into question their reading comprehension skills).

    Acting like anything above an 8th grade education is held in contempt is not accurate either.

    Yes... it is. Very accurate. In fact, there was an article telling the "friends," in essence, that the only reason they needed to finish high school was because the law required it. Of course, the article went on to emphasize that the law did NOT require college, though, so... that shouldn't be considered. Rather, Bethel, pioneering, Gilead, special pioneering, etc., is what a young person should pursue. Surely, you read that article... and was present for the study of it??

    There is plenty wrong with the WT

    Yes, plenty... including their suppression of reading (anything other than their publications), reading comprehension (anything other than what they say something means), and education (unless one plans to use that education to further WTBTS interests)... which is one of the ways they are ABLE to hold sway over their members: by demeaning education. They teach a disdain for it, actually. Methinks you prolly didn't pay much attention to the Service Meeting information and other "announcements from the podium"... or read the Kingdom Ministry.

    but misrepresenting or blowing out of proportion what they stand for, just because you disrespect their beliefs, is a bit uncalled for.

    Please... stop. Stop trying to "correct" me... because you're sounding silly, in light of what is true about this issue. I didn't state anything that wasn't true. Truly, your comments here make me think you don't know much about the WTBTS at all but are disagreeing with me... "just because" it's me. Unfortunately, I think you would find WAY more folks that disagree with you on this particular matter. You don't have to take my word for it, though... or even ask Christ. Take a poll. Just include a disclaimer that you would like responders to be completely honest and fully candid. Oh, wait... it's you: try starting there. Just be a LITTLE honest for a change. This particular topic shouldn't make that that hard.

    Reminds me of arguments asserting that the Jews didn't own, know how to use, or use swords.

    But I ain't mad at'cha... so my wish for peace for you remains.

    A slave of Christ,

    SA

  • NewChapter
    NewChapter

    Maybe you believe as you do, Aguest, because your reading comprehension is low. Is that okay for me to say?

  • EntirelyPossible
    EntirelyPossible

    When you aren't moving, yes. But, please see both of my statements, restated above.

    Yes, you are trying to re-define stumbling into a narrow definition to suit your need to be right.

    Well, no... I was trying to help you "see" what stumbling includes. That you still don't/can't/won't isn't on me.

    I never said it was. Why are you getting so defensive?

    Then you just disappoint me. Because I know you're (much) more intelligent than that. I remember "when"... even if some of the more recent folks don't.

    To be fair, the made up stuff you guys post, saying anything to be right, making stuff up... it just isn't worth expending the brain power to refute it all. Besides, you do a good job refuting it yourself. I mean, after Jesus and his dad couldn't even be bothered to step up and tell me what my shirt pattern was, they have so little credibility.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit