Except in Christendom where there's no way one paid minister can shepherd the whole church and there's nothing even close to training for handling sensitive situations like this.
I'm sorry, but Ethos, you've never gone to church have you? This has not been my experience at all. Most churches do NOT have a single pastor, they have a large group to help the pastoring of others. There is usually a lead pastor, associate pastor, worship pastor, childrens pastor, students pastor, and an elder and deacon body that helps assist those in need. Many churches staff the church with trained professionals (including licensed therapists or physicians), and are willing to pay for outside help when the need arrises. Your idea that a church has a single pastor that is responsible for the whole group is false. Maybe you've watched too many movies about small town churches? There may be SOME churches like that, but definitely not the majority. Plus a single trained pastor is better than 100 untrained janitor elders.
It's funny how the WT concept of outside churches is a complete fabrication. Many times those that came from a church to the WT came from a cult like organization also. So they don't know the difference.
Again, the WT will not help financially with someone who needs professional medical help. There is not a fund set up to help those in need. ALL funds are to go directly to the WTS. Why is that Ethos?
You condemn other churches for their help, when the WT does VERY LITTLE to help the average rank and file JW in need. Perhaps another in the congregation will help financially, but this is not approved by the WT. There is no fund to help those in need financially or medically. Yet you still like to condemn "Christendom" for their help of the hungry, sick, and poor.
Build a hospital, food bank, homeless shelter, or SOMETHING, and then you can go around judging other churches that DO help in a physical way.