Pterist
The Mosaic law covenant was a bilateral contract between God and the nation of Israel. The nation of Israel broke the coventant. The proof is in history, the temple was destroyed, along with Jerusalem and the sacrificial cult....no scriptures necessary it's transparent in history . 70AD
mP:
We were talking about Jesus and considering he died 40 years before, then the fact remains outstanding he never replaced the law.
Just because the temple or Jerusalem was destroyed doesnt remove or cancel a law. The WhiteHouse where all laws are signed into effect was burnt by theBritish in 1812, that doesnt mean the entire constitution of the US was cancelled ? Of course not that stupid. The temple & jerusalem were destroyed iwhen the Babylonians came and yet that didnt cancel Moses, so your assumption is wrong. Assuming makes an ass out of you and me, is true once again.
Bible history itself shows that your statement is wrong. Again without a scripture we cant say that was ever gods thought in th eBible.
Anyway the fact remains even if destroying the temple did somehow cacel Moses law, what is the replacement ? By way of your thinking that means anarchy or no law, because Jesus never said when the temple is destroyed we no longer have to worry about Moses law.
In the end by your own admission the law of Moses was cancelled in 70AD because of the temple being destroyed, means Jesus was fine with it and the law continued from 30-70AD. I dont agree with your temple analysis as its irrelevant, i was focusing on Jesus, for me his directions are found in the gospels and thats where i read his thoughts and ideas.
Paul can say whatever he wishes that is not Jesus words, they are found in the gospels.