Here is a typical example of WT double-speak. They bring up claims made by "opposers" that are supposedly false, when in actuality, the claims of the "opposers" are true and WT tries to hide the facts:
---
....
jv chap. 28 p. 630 Testing and Sifting From Within
"Falsely , however, some who professed to be Christian brothers charged that TheWatchTower had denied that Jesus is the Mediator between God and men, that it had repudiated the ransom and denied the necessity and fact of the atonement"
----
But, the WTS does make this claim!! IT says that Jesus is the Mediator only for the 144,000, of which there are only a few thousand of left on earth.
w79 11/15 pp. 24-25 par. 12 Benefiting from "One Mediator Between God and Men"
12 So Jesus Christ in heaven is the Mediator between God and the spiritual Israelites, while these are still in the flesh as men and women. Even within the membership limits of this small "holy nation" the mediatorship of Jesus Christ has expanded, for God has followed a certain order in admitting classes of persons into the new covenant. Thus, for about a year from Pentecost of 33 C.E., Jesus was the Mediator of only those spiritual Israelites who had been fleshly Jews or circumcised Jewish proselytes. About 3,000 of these were added to spiritual Israel on that day of Pentecost, 33 C.E. (Acts 2:10, 37-41) Then, likely in the following year (34 C.E.) as a side effect of the persecution by Saul of Tarsus, the "good news" about the Christ was preached in Samaria and the holy spirit ‘fell upon’ the baptized believers there. (Acts 8:15-17) From then on the mediatorship of Jesus was widened out to benefit spiritual Israelites who had been men and women of Samaria, Samaritans.
20 What, then, is Christ’s role in this program of salvation? Paul proceeds to say: "There is one God, and one mediator between God and men [not, all men], a man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all."—1 Tim. 2:5, 6.
In this case, the [ ] that WT inserts nullifies 1 Tim. 2:5,6 by supporting WT's unscriptural interpretation.