I personally hate the ambiguity at the end, i.e. "we're not saying what Jehovah did or did not do." Yes, of course you're telling us what he did by just telling the story. If you don't think Jehovah had any hand in these events, then why tell the story? The whole thing was very reminiscent to me of the experience in the 2013 Yearbook where a family described it as "Jehovah's hand" that they were out at the meeting when a passenger plane ploughed into their apartment block killing all 153 onboard. The Society can hold its hands up and deny making any direct implications, but the publishers still come away with the desired impression - that Jehovah performs miracles for his servants if they are obedient.
[edit post: The Quiet One - that's a great observation on my article, I'll fix it. Thank you!]
Cedars