Question regarding Faith...(adamah)

by tec 210 Replies latest jw friends

  • tec
    tec

    Actually, I take Christ as the starting point, Jgnat.

    And I certainly meandered around that for a long time, not fully understanding it at first (high school and beyond), then turning to others (wts for instance) when I wanted to get back to God but had no idea what I believed about Him or what could be true or how to even find out what WAS true other than reading the bible to at least know if someone was trying to fool me about what it said; and after the jws I researched a few other things too (though I DID hear NOT to go to any of them... my Lord said to me when I had invited the mormons in shortly after ending things with the jw's - though I did not know it was Him at the time, i did not understand that He spoke - have you NOT learned?... and everything in me was screaming to get away from them - as they were the 'voice of a stranger')

    I did not know for a long time that we needed only Christ. I learned that. I heard that. (Or perhaps rather.. I un-learned what man teaches.. and re-learned what the Spirit teaches)

    You think that I have never considered arguments against or tested what I believe? Of course I have. Of course I have. Everyone here has, or they would not have made it here to begin with.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    Semantics, OK. Faith in Christ as your starting point. Your personal, intimate and apparently tangible relationship with Christ.

    I don't know if you have recognized it, but the closer we get to talking about doubt, the more you point to Christ. It is very, very similar to the cognitive dissonance episodes I've witnessed in my husband when he feels threatened. He repeats, "I know it is truth" over and over like a mantra.

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    Everyone here has [tested what they believe] or they would not have made it here to begin with. - tec

    I'm harping on doubt because you introduced the thought that the tiniest doubt invalidates faith. I don't think it does. If you do believe this, though, that means you are highly motivated to invalidate contrary ideas.

    I am not sure that everyone that exits the Witnesses is wise to all falsehoods. Consider Lisa Rose's threads. She's dived head first in to another artfully constructed falsehood and expends all her cognitive energy in supporting it. She appears completely blind to it's weaknesses.

  • Comatose
    Comatose

    Tec do you accept the evidence that shows Neanderthals and other early humans lived tens of thousands of years ago?

    If not, can you briefly explain why, if so can you explain how sin and a ransom fit?

  • tec
    tec

    Good morning Terry!

    The jws don't actually have faith in armageddon... they have faith in the GB, who tells them what armageddon is, when it is coming, and what will be their reward.

    In your spouse example... the husband's faith would be in the wife, that she can deliver on her promise, not in the great sex. Now his doubt is a lack of faith in her, that she does not know about his ED, and that he has something to do with this promise she has made him, rather than that she has already accounted for all contingencies.

    Just some counter-points as food for thought ; )

    Peace,

    tammy

  • tec
    tec

    Good morning Zound!

    This ABSOLUTE conviction in something that admittidly went on in your head and your feelings is a little scary.

    Within... inthe spirit... so not quite the same thing as in 'my head and feelings'. Remember too, that this was not an isolated incident.

    The whole JW situation came from those ***holes in Brooklyn taking advantage of peoples 'faith' or 'hope' to believe in certain things. Perhaps deluded themselves, but regardless, the Brooklyn boys encouraged this 'blind faith' - resulting in JW's that regardless of the evidence, regardless of anything they may see or hear about Watchtower's lies, regardless of their own doubts they WILL GO DOWN WITH THE SHIP. They will weather any storm and eventually die thinking that armageddon is just around the corner etc etc.
    I think most ex-JW's would know at least one JW like this - the Watchtower doctrine is so much a part of their brain that the Watchtower society could completely self destruct and these diehards will ignore it completely and stick with what they are totally convinced is true.

    Yes, I hear you.

    The point of mentioning that is - you say that this time you've cracked it! This time you are REALLY convinced. This time you KNOW. Nothing could possibly convince you otherwise. No room for doubt.

    I understand what you are thinking.

    But I do NOT know... anything... other than Christ. He is the Truth, and I listen to Him.

    Believe me, when I stopped studying with the witnesses, I had no idea how I would EVER trust myself again. How could I ever do that, when I thought I had it right with them, and I was so wrong?

    Well, I didn't and I don't.

    I put faith in Christ... and let Him teach me. And of course, he is right there in front of our 'faces', and was all along. "I am the Truth. Listen to ME. Follow ME."

    Not ourselves, not men, not religion... just Him.

    Do you see what I'm getting at here? You can replace the JW experience with a Muslims experience, with a Budhists experience, with any number of persons experience that do not even have anything to do with a particular religion.
    It's easy to say, "well they were just deluded, they are just misled - they are listening to Jesus but not KNOWING Jesus."

    For a large part, I would suggest that they are not listening to Christ in the first place. They are listening to men, religious leaders, etc. (Muslims don't even claim to be listening to Christ, but to Mohammad (though with any religion, there are those who are also listening to religious leaders, and what their religious leaders say that their Prophet meant)

    Jw's are listening to the GB and the wts. Replace most any religious institution in place of the wts, and most of its adherents do the same.

    You are claiming faith. ABSOLUTE conviction. Unshakable. Anything me or others have to say could not possibly shake your faith. Any evidence could not possibly shake your faith about Jesus.

    It might... if you or others HAD something that was evidence against Christ and my faith in Him... but you do not. I do listen to what people say; I don't put my fingers in my ears, or run away, or disengage. No one has presented evidence that is against Christ, so how can my faith be shaken?

    (I mean, yes, I know you don't have anything that will hold up against Him. But that doesn't mean you couldn't prove me wrong if you had something that proved Christ false. But... you don't.)

    Can you see the similarities in this conviction with convictions such as the JW's or lets say that woman in the US who drowned her children in the bathtub because 'Jesus told her to'. You've attempted to explain the distinction, but could you have another attempt at how you see the distinction there?

    JW's put their faith in men, even when those men and that religion are shown to be false. They are not listening to Christ. (they will take the GB's word of what Christ is written to have said any day of the week... OR... they won't be jws for much longer) They are told NOT to examine evidence outside of their faith; they won't research their own religion; they are afraid of anyone who has left or who presents them with the facts or truth of their religion. (not mere arguments, but actual facts of what their own religion has previously taught, etc)

    The woman who drowned her children in the bathtub is also not listening to Christ. She may have heard a voice that identified as "jesus" tell her that, but that is not THE Christ (Jaheshua), because all that He HAS taught us is against harming or killing others, and drowning one's own children (or anyone) is against love as well.

    So what people say is from Christ CAN and SHOULD be tested... against Christ's own teachings, and against love. Whether is is a religion or religious leader saying so, or someone saying that they heard it directly from Him, themselves.

    Hope I'm not coming across as aggressive - I'm asking these things to challenge my own beliefs also, not just to try and prove a point.

    No worries.

    On a side note:
    You are willing and fairly good at explaining your reasoning (though I don't agree with it) - I wonder if you would mind giving me some feedback in the near future on a project/article I'm working on regarding trying to teach people critical thinking ability? I'd appreciate a firm believers feedback, suggestions on it - and you seem very articulate, engaging and definately a firm believer.

    I can certainly look at it... I can't promise anything more than that until I see it though. But I could look at it, sure.

    Peace to you,

    tammy

  • latinthunder
    latinthunder
    But I do NOT know... anything... other than Christ. He is the Truth, and I listen to Him.

    This is the same claim the Watchtower makes. You are saying you have the truth. That's how cults start.

  • adamah
    adamah

    A child believes toys will magically appear under a Christmas tree, built upon on a long string of suppositions:

    Santa will leave toys for them on Dec 25th, if:

    1) they've been nice (vs naughty) which,

    2) an omniscient Santa KNOWS what they want, but only

    3) after leaving toys for other child on the route,

    4) delivered by magic flying sled powered by reindeer after,

    5) departing from the North Pole with a sledful of toys,

    6) that were made in a factory at the North Pole,

    7) By a team of elves who constructed them,

    8) Under the direction of Santa,

    9) Whom the child must have FAITH in order to BELIEVE in Santa's existence.

    So despite a long string of suppositions, the entire chain collapses if Santa isn't "real". Do the suppositions serve as PROOF? Is the toy VISIBLE PROOF of the existence of Santa? Are there alternative explanation(s)? Could it be that the parents are buying toys, and hence they know what toys their child wants? Are the parents telling them a lil' fib for their own good, in order to teach them the lesson of the brain's susceptibility to delusions?

    Ironically many parents don't learn the lesson themselves, as they WANT to believe in Gods, just as they WANTED to believe in Santa.

    Adam

  • tec
    tec
    This is the same claim the Watchtower makes. You are saying you have the truth. That's how cults start.

    No. I am saying that Christ is the truth... follow HIM.

    WTS says they have the truth and/or they are the truth, and to follow them.

    I don't want anyone following ME. I am not the truth; I am not the life; I cannot save anyone; the most that I can do is bear witness to Christ.

    Christ is the Truth and the Life... go to HIM, follow HIM. If you want truth; if you want to know the truth of God; if you want life.

    Not me.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • tec
    tec
    Semantics, OK. Faith in Christ as your starting point. Your personal, intimate and apparently tangible relationship with Christ.

    No, not my relationship with Him... but Him, Himself... with or without me.

    You may already understand what I mean... so I apologize if it seems I am arguing. I just need that to be clear.

    I don't know if you have recognized it, but the closer we get to talking about doubt, the more you point to Christ. It is very, very similar to the cognitive dissonance episodes I've witnessed in my husband when he feels threatened. He repeats, "I know it is truth" over and over like a mantra.

    I always point to Christ. No matter what we are talking about (when it comes to faith). So I have no reason not to believe you when you state that I do it when 'doubt' comes up also. I point to Him because He is the one that matters; not me. I don't feel threatened though. There has been nothing threatening presented.

    I'm harping on doubt because you introduced the thought that the tiniest doubt invalidates faith. I don't think it does. If you do believe this, though, that means you are highly motivated to invalidate contrary ideas.

    That is not actually what I said. I said that small doubt may hinder small faith.

    Asking questions is not doubt. Not trusting that Christ will keep his promises... is doubt, and a lacking in faith (or weak faith... as He said to his disciples at times: ye of little faith. That does not mean he cast them aside, because He did not do that; but He was patient and continued to teach them. None of them who remained with Him doubted that He was the Messiah; they just did not always understand what He was teaching them)

    I am not sure that everyone that exits the Witnesses is wise to all falsehoods. Consider Lisa Rose's threads. She's dived head first in to another artfully constructed falsehood and expends all her cognitive energy in supporting it. She appears completely blind to it's weaknesses.

    Of course. I agree. Though I would think that no one exiting the witnesss is wise to falsehoods (no one period, for that matter), and some become ensnared all over again and some give up on such things altogether, and searching leads people to various places, depending upon what they consider to be of worth (or other factors as well). I meant only that no one who exited the wts started where they are right now. They tested; they listened to various other evidence; they LOOKED at what they put faith IN, and found it wanting. I brought that up because you seem to imply that I never tested; never learned; turn a blind eye to what others present because it might cause doubt. None of those things are true. Now if your point was something else, then my apologies, I have misunderstood. Peace, tammy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit