Knowledge by Proxy

by braincleaned 141 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • tec
    tec

    Hey, I'm not the one who misunderstands what faith is: that's all on you, TEC....

    You keep saying that like this somehow make it true. But your explanations are built upon faulty basis.

    Nope. You're making up stuff, AKA Xian eisegesis.

    What specifically? Because I don't like getting lost in the things you say. Keep in mind that i said Paul MAY have been speaking of blood covering sin... I don't know. I DO know how hearing the Spirit works though. So I focused on that, which is the point, right?

    Their sacrifices were not sin offerings, but are explicitly stated in Genesis as to the specific type, i.e. Abel brought the "first born" of his flocks, and received God's favor; hence their sacrifice is consistent with later Levitical wellness (AKA 'first fruits') offerings described in Leviticus 23:9.

    Then the point is the same, Adamah, on this and your next point... since we are speaking of what faith IS, and how Abel (and the others) may have HEARD. Abel, in faith, brought the first fruits/firstborn. He heard to do so, and then DID. Perhaps His LOVE allowed Him to do so; whereas Cain's love was lacking. (or he might have taken the counsel of God, rather than allowing jealousy and anger toward his brother to compel him to murder his brother)

    You're shot-gunning, and even adding details to the Bible?

    I am explaining how the Spirit speaks, from my own personal experience. The bible backs it up though:

    Job 33:14-16

    For God may speak in one way, or another, yet man does not perceive it. In a dream, in a vision of the night, while deep sleep falls upon men, while slumbering in their beds, then He opens the ears of men...

    God also spoke through visions, direct words, the early disciples had their eyes opened so as to understand what was written about Christ in the scriptures, etc. Nothing I have said is not also shown in the experience of others at some point.

    Careful, as Jesus decribed the Bible as "perfect" as written,

    Please cite where He has done this. Please.

    and elsewhere warns about those teachers with their false doctrines who'd dare to twist and alter the meanings to suit their own man-made ideologies.

    Sure, why would He not make such a warning. But I have not done so. I can show you even more citations from the bible that support what I have shared if you like.

    Back to the original Abel question which you leaped over in a single bound.

    Um... yeah, I answerd it. You have not answered my question though.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • adamah
    adamah

    TEC said-

    Then the point is the same, Adamah, on this and your next point... since we are speaking of what faith IS, and how Abel (and the others) may have HEARD. Abel, in faith, brought the first fruits/firstborn. He heard to do so, and then DID. Perhaps His LOVE allowed Him to do so; whereas Cain's love was lacking. (or he might have taken the counsel of God, rather than allowing jealousy and anger toward his brother to compel him to murder his brother)

    One point at a time, please: I'm not getting dragged into a "throw a plate of spaghetti against a wall and see what sticks" discussion, so let's stick to ONE point (which is Abel, for now).

    For ONE, NOWHERE in the Bible (OT/NT) does it indicate that Abel "heard" the voice of the Holy Spirit or God telling him what to offer, or was directed by the Holy Spirit to offer from his flock, or had ANY interaction WITH the Holy Spirit, etc. In fact, the concept of Holy Spirit was foreign to Judaism, since it was introduced LONG AFTER Genesis was written, such that if you said the words "Holy Spirit" to the Yahwist, he'd look at you like you had a hole in your head.

    "Holy Spirit" is an anachronistic concept to Hebraic beliefs, and it only later emerged in later books of the Tanakh (eg twice in Isaiah), and obviously it is prevalent in early Christian writings. Obviously, the idea of the Trinity was quite anathema to the monotheistic Jews.

    In ALL of the events depicted in Genesis (and the Torah, for that matter), God either appeared personally, or an angel appeared to serve as a messenger from God. That's it.

    So, you wanna try again without making stuff up?

    (And please avoid using figures of speech or metaphors from sensory perception (like 'heard'), so can you try that again, without using such terms?)

    PS do you see ANY POSSIBLE ethical/moral PROBLEM with God communicating the "right" answer to Abel, and NOT doing the same for Cain? You see how that might create an unfair situation if God is seen giving away the answer key to the test to one, and then favoring that one for helping him to please himself?

    Adam

  • tec
    tec

    I am not the one who has added more points, love. The POINT was with regard to faith and to hearing. You changed the point. I answered how such ones may have heard... the different ways. I even showed you from the bible that God spoke to men, in those various ways... though certainly now He speaks through Christ.

    You may not agree because it was not written... though it is written by the author of Hebrews... IF you understood that passage, regarding faith and faith following the thing heard. But so what? Nothing happened ever, other than what is written?

    In ALL of the events depicted in Genesis (and the Torah, for that matter), God either appeared personally, or an angel appeared to serve as a messenger from God. That's it.

    Do you want me to find for you the examples of God speaking in dreams or visions? MANY prophets had dreams and visions. God even SAID, as written, that he spoke to prophets through visions and dreams, but to Moses he spoke 'face to face'.

    You sure you want to stick with your claim above here?

    Now will you answer the question that I asked you? How about this one also:

    Careful, as Jesus decribed the Bible as "perfect" as written... adamah

    Please cite where He has done this. Please.... tec

    My apologies. It is not a question. But could you cite it for me anyway, since you are here accusing me of making things up... but doing that yourself?

    Or will you continue to sidestep?

    Peace,

    tammy

  • braincleaned
    braincleaned

    //PS do you see ANY POSSIBLE ethical/moral PROBLEM with God communicating the "right" answer to Abel, and NOT doing the same for Cain? You see how that might create an unfair situation if God is seen giving away the answer key to the test to one, and then favoring that one for helping him to please himself?//

    That was my concern earlier on. If God speaks to some and not others, he is an unfair God.
    It's like a parent that would tell only one kid what he wants, then punishes the others for not doing his will.
    *(Example at the flood)
    It makes no sense.

    What does makes sense though, and I mean no disrespect, is that hearing voices is a mental issue.
    We know all too well the horror stories — of those like Abraham — that have killed their children for hearing God telling them to.
    Is is no secret that hearing voices and attributing them to invisible deities is a clinical problem.

    “A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.” ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

  • adamah
    adamah

    TEC said-

    I am not the one who has added more points, love. The POINT was with regard to faith and to hearing. You changed the point. I answered how such ones may have heard... the different ways. I even showed you from the bible that God spoke to men, in those various ways... though certainly now He speaks through Christ. You may not agree because it was not written... though it is written by the author of Hebrews... IF you understood that passage, regarding faith and faith following the thing heard. But so what? Nothing happened ever, other than what is written?

    You are blurring the act of hearing God's voice (input of information) as if that is what builds faith, when it's NOT even a requisite for building and/or demonstrating faith.

    In the Bible, demonstrating faith requires an ACTION based on information that MAY or MAY NOT have been communicated previously to the individual.

    In the 'information was communicated' category, consider the case of Noah, who acted ON FAITH by building the ark on the PROMISE of salvation for him and his family, although he didn't KNOW if a deluge would occur, or that God would honor his 'Ark construction covenant' which he entered with Noah. His act of faith was NOT due to hearing the voice of God, but demonstrating his faith by ACTING on the PROMISE God made to him, since he may have only been hearing voices in his head and have been building an ark based on an auditory hallucination, and been the laughing stock of the area for having built a massive boat far away from water THAT was the example of FAITH that Noah demonstrates.

    In the 'information was not communicated' category, consider Abel, who acted on FAITH ALONE by offering the best of his flock by offering the firstborn; as braincleaned says, it would be Divine favortism for God to 'whisper the answer key' to one individual and not the other, and such favortism cannot be blamed on the mortal (I know how much you like to do that kind of thing, using the "might makes right" excuse).

    But again, the mere fact that many individuals heard the voice of God in the Bible has NOTHING to do with demonstrating (i.e. ACTING on) their faith. In fact, many Bible characters heard the voice of God and acted CONTRARY to the orders they heard, and hence demonstrated their LACK of faith (eg ever read the account of Jonah and the whale, TEC?). You seem to think that the mere act of hearing God's voice has something to do with building or demonstrating faith, when it does NOT.

    2 Cor 5:7 says it all: Xians are "to walk by faith, not sight". To Xians, the idea is that ALL sensory perceptions (hearing, sight, touch, etc) of the human mortal form are worldly and merely illusions, less important than the spiritual matters, and hence why Xians must act on God-given knowledge ('gnosis') which is bestowed as a gift, much as faith (the confidence to act on gnosis) also is considered as a gift that Xians must ask to be given from God.

    In both cases, there IS no discernable information transferred: instead, both are examples of the process of 'Divine revelation', a mystical magical transferrence of information that is not detectable to anyone, much less the recipient, who just "knows" in some cases without being told, and ACTS on the promises which are often unspoken.

    PS the Job 33 passage you cited has one of Job's "friends" claiming that God speaks to people via revelation, but note how it says, "they do not perceive God's voice".

    So if you claim to perceive the voice of Jesus in your head as a voice, such that you "hear" it, per the Bible itself, you are not receiving "divine revelation", but are more likely experiencing an 'auditory hallucination', a common occurrance in many people (∼10% of the population) which can in some cases be caused by mental illness (eg schizophrenics, bipolar), or as a result of traumatic events (post child-abuse, etc), but in many cases just seems to be the result of anomalous information processing where the person is unable to recognize their internal voice as coming from within and misattribute it to an external source (eg God).

    Adam

  • tec
    tec

    You moved the goalpost there Adamah... demonstrating faith is not the same as faith, itself. Building and demonstrating faith are two different things. I'll go through your entire post. But how about you answer the questions I asked of you? Or are you STILL going to sidestep?

    In the Bible, demonstrating faith requires an ACTION based on information that MAY or MAY NOT have been communicated previously to the individual.

    Acting on faith IS hearing and obeying, even if hearing comes in the form of revelation, dreams, the Spirit, words spoken.

    In the 'information was communicated' category, consider the case of Noah, who acted ON FAITH by building the ark on the PROMISE of salvation for him and his family,

    He had to hear God to have heard the promise God made, yes?

    although he didn't KNOW if a deluge would occur, or that God would honor his 'Ark construction covenant' which he entered with Noah.

    God told him. He was a righteous man, and so His faith was in God. He could be assured that such would happen because God TOLD Him such would happen.

    Assured expectation of what one hopes for (the promise)... (based on what one heard from God, or the Spirit).... the evidence of something not YET seen. (knowing something is going to happen, though it has not YET happened, based on what one heard from God, or the Spirit)

    Noah is a perfect example of the Hebrews definition of faith. So I don't know how you end up twisting it around so completely?

    His act of faith was NOT due to hearing the voice of God, but demonstrating his faith by ACTING on the PROMISE God made to him, since he may have only been hearing voices in his head and have been building an ark based on an auditory hallucination, and been the laughing stock of the area for having built a massive boat far away from water THAT was the example of FAITH that Noah demonstrates.

    Again... he had to HEAR the promise to begin with Adamah! He had to put full faith in God and IN what he heard, which no doubt MADE him a laughingstock... but his faith was proved TRUE; as faith in Christ and God and their promises ALWAYS are. That would be another point of the list of examples that Paul gave.

    In the 'information was not communicated' category, consider Abel, who acted on FAITH ALONE by offering the best of his flock by offering the firstborn; as braincleaned says, it would be Divine favortism for God to 'whisper the answer key' to one individual and not the other, and such favortism cannot be blamed on the mortal (I know how much you like to do that kind of thing, using the "might makes right" excuse).

    Yeah, I have never used a 'might makes right' excuse, so I'm not sure WHO you're addressing here.

    And yes, Abel knew what to offer... Cain would not have been told to do what was right, if he could not also have known what was right to do. Are you sure that you haven't just placed a spin on the story to keep it in line with your view of God (whatever that view is). But all that was revealed in that account is what was already in Cain; and do you think THAT might have something to do with why his sacrifice was not right or looked upon with favor?

    But again, the mere fact that many individuals heard the voice of God in the Bible has NOTHING to do with demonstrating (i.e. ACTING on) their faith.

    And... your point? I never said otherwise.

    In fact, many Bible characters heard the voice of God and acted CONTRARY to the orders they heard, and hence demonstrated their LACK of faith (eg ever read the account of Jonah and the whale, TEC?). You seem to think that the mere act of hearing God's voice has something to do with building or demonstrating faith, when it does NOT.

    Yeah, one can choose to listen... one can choose NOT to listen. Again... what is your point, as per the discussion on what faith IS, that we are having. One can KNOW that God is REAL... and still not belong to God, and still act against God. Like Satan and the angels that followed Him.

    Now Jonah had faith in God. He knew God was real. That was never a question. He knew that what God told him was true. He just didn't want to do what God was telling him, he did not want to travel to the ninevites and then have God turn around and show mercy upon them... though he did get around to doing as God directed Him.

    2 Cor 5:7 says it all: Xians are "to walk by faith, not sight". To Xians, the idea is that ALL sensory perceptions (hearing, sight, touch, etc) of the human mortal form are worldly and merely illusions, less important than the spiritual matters, and hence why Xians must act on God-given knowledge ('gnosis') which is bestowed as a gift, much as faith (the confidence to act on gnosis) also is considered as a gift that Xians must ask to be given from God.

    They are just senses, Adamah. Not illusion. The flesh means nothing; the spirit counts for everything... is true; but that does not make the flesh an illusion. And yes, faith is a gift that one can ask for, but the fact that one WANTS to ask for it could have something to do with it being given, yes? AS Christ also said:

    "Seek and you will find. Knock and the door will be opened to you?"

    Sometimes you really get it, Adamah.... and sometimes you just have so many other things clouding your sight, standing in your way, so that you only get some truth, and then you wrap it with all these misconceptions so that you don't come into ALL truth. Something that won't happen unless you listen to the Spirit... who guides us into ALL truth. (also written in the bible).

    In both cases, there IS no discernable information transferred: instead, both are examples of the process of 'Divine revelation', a mystical magical transferrence of information that is not detectable to anyone, much less the recipient, who just "knows" in some cases without being told, and ACTS on the promises which are often unspoken.

    Sometimes, yes (though if someone knows something, then it has been detected by the recipient, he just might not always know who to give credit TO...)... like those examples of men of faith, who knew what to do, becasue they HEARD what to do. (in the various ways that God and the Spirit speak)

    BUT that is just some cases, Adamah... there are also instances of men being TOLD, with words. Or in dreams. Or in visions. Or in having one's eyes OPENED so as to be able to SEE and understand what is written; or as in having one's ears OPENED, so as to be able to hear what the Spirit is speaking. And John received VERY specific information in his revelation. Specific enough that he could write it down and share it with others.

    PS the Job 33 passage you cited has one of Job's "friends" claiming that God speaks to people via revelation, but note how it says, "they do not perceive God's voice".

    Do you undersrtand what this means? Men were not perceiving God speaking to him (just as men are not perceiving for some reason or another, the Spirit speaking now)... SO God instead spoke to them in dreams; as they would be able to hear Him then, when they were not hearing Him otherwise. But thank you for confirming what I shared, that God DOES speak in dreams.

    So if you claim to perceive the voice of Jesus in your head as a voice, such that you "hear" it, per the Bible itself, you are not receiving "divine revelation", but are more likely experiencing an 'auditory hallucination', a common occurrance in many people (∼10% of the population) which can in some cases be caused by mental illness (eg schizophrenics, bipolar), or as a result of traumatic events (post child-abuse, etc), but in many cases just seems to be the result of anomalous information processing where the person is unable to recognize their internal voice as coming from within and misattribute it to an external source (eg God).

    Yeah, Adamah? There is nothing 'as per the bible' about what you have said above. I have not described anything that men who heard have not also described AS PER the bible.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • adamah
    adamah

    TEC said-

    You moved the goalpost there Adamah... demonstrating faith is not the same as faith, itself. Building and demonstrating faith are two different things.

    Holy Simoly, TEC: you are so confused, you seem unable to recognize I'm not "moving any goalposts", but simply repeating the point I made a few pages ago, explaining how Hebrews 11:1 differentiates between DEMONSTRATING manifestations of one's faith to others by performing observable actions (Greek word is hypostasis, lit. translated as 'title deed' to suggest a promissory note that can be shown to others to prove the possession of faith); the second part then focuses on the actual POSSESSION of INTERNAL faith, which can be strengthened by, eg, reading the accounts of "men of faith" in the OT, or asking for faith from God (as a gift), etc. One's internal faith CAN be shown to others, but it is INTERNAL.

    Into that concept, you've mixed in the element of communication of the perceivable message that at times MAY tell the person what act to carry out to demonstrate their faith, i.e. the ORDER from God telling Abraham to kill his son, Isaac. But you're missing that what counts in a discussion of faith is NOT hearing the VOICE, but the DECISION to ACT upon what the voice says, whether the message of the desired response was communicated or not. It's the RESPONSE that ultimately matters, NOT perceiving the voice which orders the response.

    That point is made clear by Noah: others mocked him for the ACT of building the Ark, for ACTING upon the command that no one else could perceive. Noah could've ignored the voice in his head after dismissing it as an auditory hallucination (if he knew such things were possible), but it took FAITH on his part to ACT upon the internal voice, and to believe that it wasn't a hallucination but God speaking to him. Yes, Noah heard the promise as a voice in his head or a visual hallucination (the Bible says God walked with Noah), but the decision to ACT on the promise was an act driven by faith.

    Jonah heard the voice of God, but didn't have faith to ACT. Instead, he fled from God (until he was caught by a whale). Again, it's not HEARING that builds faith, just like Jesus refused to perform visible signs and miracles for crowds, saying that ultimately replying on one's eyes and ears is NOT what builds faith.

    In the case of Abel, there's no recorded voice from God in the account, yet Abel acts on FAITH. Same goes for Moses parents: the Exodus account tells of them acting to save baby Moses, NOT by following any direct order from God telling them what to do, but simply KNOWING what they must do, as if driven by some mysterious process. Those are BOTH examples of faith mentioned in Hebrews, DESPITE not hearing, seeing, or perceiving an ORDER.

    FAITH is demonstrated by ACTIONS, by the RESPONSE of the faithful, and NOT by the process of receiving the command or order. In many cases, the faithful never is given a perceivable order to act upon (as the case of Abel shows).

    TEC said- But how about you answer the questions I asked of you? Or are you STILL going to sidestep?

    Ironic that you cannot see that I've been trying to do exactly that, but you're apparently unable to recognize the answer unless it's explicitly handed to you?

  • tec
    tec

    I'm handing them explicitely to you, love. I answer you DIRECTLY, without any cloak and dagger, as per what IS written... giving examples also from my own experience, which is backed by what is written.

    Where are you drawing upon your knowledge from?

    So how about you answer directly... why do you assume that unseen means unperceivable. And please show me where Christ said that the bible is perfect, as written.

    Can you not just answer directly?

    Peace,

    tammy

  • adamah
    adamah

    TEC said-

    Where are you drawing upon your knowledge from? So how about you answer directly... why do you assume that unseen means unperceivable. And please show me where Christ said that the bible is perfect, as written. Can you not just answer directly?

    Didn't you know?

    Jesus talks to me, and I asked him. I'm surprised he didn't mention it to you, too (which is pretty odd, now that I come to think of it: he's never mentioned talking to a TEC)?

  • tootired2care
    tootired2care

    when the Bible speaks of faith, it refers to acting without any other reason to justify the action, aside from what the believer HOPES is true, being completely DEVOID of discernable or detectable evidence. Faith is what drives JWs to knock on doors, even die by refusing blood, as they're trusting that they'll be rewarded with eternal life spent enjoying marathon panda-petting sessions. Faith is no joke: people are willing to DIE in the name of faith (confusing their obstinance and closed-minded commitment to dogmatic beliefs with it).

    It's also what causes muslim fundies to blow themselves and other 'infidels' up with them.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit