Oklahoma beheading - Islam is a disease

by Simon 1524 Replies latest members adult

  • Qcmbr
    Qcmbr

    Own goal confused. This thread was sparked by a Muslim , at work, trying to force his beliefs on others.

    Most people respect that there are places to discuss things in an open manner and others don't.it has nothing to do with the strength of feeling here. You aren't listening because you keep restating the position of those opposed to Islamic teachings as wanting to 'deport' people and as 'hate' . Nobody is suggesting that people who have committed no crimes or anti-social behaviour be targeted in any way. What is being suggested is that Islam is by its very nature is poisonous and opposed to Western ideals not simply because of a few extremists but because it's printed book hard bakes medieval , anti-women, violent struggle and ultra nationalist ideals.

    Here is a suggestion of the sort of things I would like to see as standard western practise:

    1: No faith schools allowed.

    2: No home schooling on religious grounds.

    3: Banning all religious clothing on public , municipal property (schools, courthouses etc.)

    4: Enacting protection laws banning arranged marriages for under 18s.

    5: The immediate creation by and for Muslims of country based , open to the public, authoraties in charge of mosques, Islamic religious instruction etc. This would make clear the expectation of policing extremist views in a transparent fashion. Any mosque violating would be closed until reformed.

    6: All people leaving the country to fight for Islamic wars to receive a permanent ban on re-entering the country.

    7: A clear and honest review of all religious privilege across all religions with the aim of imposing a set of public standards (covering shunning, honour killing, women's rights, gender issues etc.) with mild sanction (losing charitable status) through to bans on individuals, congregations or religious practices depending on the seriousness of the social problem.

    8: Standardisation and potential banning of such things as halal slaughtering practices if deemed inhumane.

    Just as practices once condoned by religion (women as property, slavery, papal political influence, church tax, mandatory church attendance etc.) have been banned so we should ensure the laws of the land are clear and unequivacable in protecting the western way of life and regulating older medieval organisations.

  • confusedandalone
    confusedandalone

    Qcmbr - "Nobody is suggesting that people who have committed no crimes or anti-social behaviour be targeted in any way. "

    " If you must round them up, then start rounding up any of them that has expressed any extremist ideas or statements, and put their asses in the FEMA camps."

    " What would be so difficult in making membership of a group a crime in itself? It's been done before for other far less dangerous groups."

    " No problem at all. Send them to a Muslim country if they want to remain Muslim. It's all make believe bullshit anyway. It's time to put an end to all this crap."

    This is on the first page. I don't even need to go through the other 17. Something tells me that this will be ignored as well.

  • confusedandalone
    confusedandalone

    Here is a suggestion of the sort of things I would like to see as standard western practise:

    1: No faith schools allowed.

    2: No home schooling on religious grounds.

    3: Banning all religious clothing on public , municipal property (schools, courthouses etc.)

    4: Enacting protection laws banning arranged marriages for under 18s.

    5: The immediate creation by and for Muslims of country based , open to the public, authoraties in charge of mosques, Islamic religious instruction etc. This would make clear the expectation of policing extremist views in a transparent fashion. Any mosque violating would be closed until reformed.

    6: All people leaving the country to fight for Islamic wars to receive a permanent ban on re-entering the country.

    7: A clear and honest review of all religious privilege across all religions with the aim of imposing a set of public standards (covering shunning, honour killing, women's rights, gender issues etc.) with mild sanction (losing charitable status) through to bans on individuals, congregations or religious practices depending on the seriousness of the social problem.

    8: Standardisation and potential banning of such things as halal slaughtering practices if deemed inhumane.

    Just as practices once condoned by religion (women as property, slavery, papal political influence, church tax, mandatory church attendance etc.) have been banned so we should ensure the laws of the land are clear and unequivacable in protecting the western way of life and regulating older medieval organisations.

    ==============================================================================================

    So would these mandates be only for Muslims or for all religions in the West?

    This thread is becoming more and more of a joke everyday

  • Qcmbr
    Qcmbr

    Sigh confused ...please read...ALL religions.

  • AlphaMan
    AlphaMan

    This thread is becoming more and more of a joke everyday.

    .

    And when this thread finally ends, and is bumped again........will it be because of how good Islam is, or how bad Islam is? I think you know the answer to that.

  • confusedandalone
    confusedandalone

    Sigh Qcmbr.... Please realize that you only included ALL RELIGIONS in two of those points. As a university student I am sure you are aware of the fact that you should be as precise as possible when making these statements.

    Thanks for purposely ignoring the fact that I answered your first statement and it got shot to fucking hell. It is amazing how you so easily ignore the first post that shows the radical stand that you and many others are taking.

    I have however noticed that there a number of other sites that agree with you and are expressing the exact same sentiments as this post!!!

    I great site called STORMFRONT!!! I am sure you are familiar with it.

    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t968712/

  • confusedandalone
    confusedandalone

    " And when this thread finally ends, and is bumped again........will it be because of how good Islam is, or how bad Islam is? I think you know the answer to that."

    It will be because an intolerant bigot like you continues to promote hate or an even tempered moderate individual wants to call you out on your hate speech.

  • LoveUniHateExams
    LoveUniHateExams

    @confusedandalone - I apologise if my use of the phrase 'metropolitan, metrosexual liberal elite' offended you.

    Over hear in England, it doesn't mean illegal, unethical and downright plain wrong gay-bashing. Instead, it is used as a somewhat cynical reference to British political left-wing orthodoxies that for some reason must remain unchallenged.

    If I were gay, I'd rather live in the West (United States, UK, Canada, NZ, etc.) than a muslim-majority country.

    On this point at least, would you agree with me?

  • tootired2care
    tootired2care

    Confused, grow up. Critizing a religion is not hate speech, if that were the case, everything in this forum (including what you've contributed) and jwfacts would also be hate speech. Your arguments are the height of stupidity. Go back to being a watchtarded elderoid where you belong.

  • Qcmbr
    Qcmbr

    Stormfront and extremist groups such as the BNP exist precisely because the rest of us do not stand up collectively and define the boundaries. If we wish to shed blood in the streets then we sit on our hands posting memes on Facebook about unicorns and hope. Those of us DISCUSSING the problem dont want to wait until the extreme Muslims or the extreme nationalist kill again.

    ..confused stopcalling posters names - its not helping you come across in any kind of reasonable way.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit