UnD,
Your positions seems to rest wholly on this enlightenment issue, IMHO a kinda of grace for a grace period for man to ponder the fact that the Father has given him an "insight" to a relationship with himself(God). And man is going to choose to take the lifesaver or drown.
I find several, many problems with this understanding you present. In the end man has a tiny little bit of works...... He has to choose.
If Im "enlightened" and now I have this special insight into a relationship with the savior, whats stopping me from putting off the chioce until I feel like Im ready to "clean-up" and take God up on his offer.
Why not just wait till a deathbed confession then I could get all the fleshly sinning out of the way, or I could wait until Im later on in years maybe late 70s as a target age to take God up on his offer.
Why not, I know the "lifesaver" is floating next to me the rest of my life and all I have to do is grab it in case of a near death experience.
UnD,
You have proven to me, even when shown from a simple example as Mannassehs' that no matter what the scripture clearly states, you repeat the same verse back to me with your chioce slant.
You continue to admit that God chooses to draw, but deny that its Gods will, that God gets what he wants. Regardless of what man thinks he wants.
Then you try to blanket the issue with God wants all to be saved thinking, and Jesus died for everyone, without understanding that God Has already predestined his choosing and we can somehow effect this choice that was made before the founding of the earth.
To debate scripture with you is a waste of time. You feel if you show me 25 verses that imply a chioce and I show you 20 verses that dont, then you have somehow won.
In the case of Pharoah you must assume a very very vital part of your postion.
In the case of Gods sovereignty you dont have to re-invent the wheel, in the corridor time, and Gods insight on time, can we agree that God knows when he draws someone its not for a choice game thats being played out.
E