Cassi,
Good to have you back posting regular. I will not let politics become my focus although I have strong opinions about it.
Moore gets criticized mostly for his conclusions he draws and his unrestrained criticism of those he exposes.
It's all political spin, whomever has the better spin gets the people's votes or their money or both.
I suppose Moore has his 'spin' too. But the Bush/Cheney/Halliburton and Saudie connections define money in a way this "fat", "stupid" Michigan "doe boy" never dreamed of.
To all in the debate
Moore is controversial, but I'm not aware of him being caught in a lie. I haven't seen ANYONE on this thread present a thread of evidence to refute the 'facts' Michael Moore has presented in his documentaries.
Does anyone have interesting refutation of Moore's work?
Jst2laws