OK, I'm not one for conspiracy theories but lately I've uncovered some interesting facts that I think warrant some attention.
First of all, Russell was a freemason. All the early watchtower and books he authored have freemason symbology and art throughout them.
Not a big deal I thought, until I read more about freemasons and the so-called "Illuminati", a group of 13 families that supposedly control the world.
Supposedly these 13 families, such as the DuPonts, Mcdonalds, Kennedys,
Onassis, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, the Li family of China, etc, all
have their fingers in investment banking, politics, sciences, etc. Their
goal is to basically control everyone else through manipulating society
to at some point accept one world government (New World Order, UN),
which they'll control with their already great degree of influence.
Now of course this seems far-fetched, but keep listening. Every member
of these families is involved with the freemasons, ever heard of them? I
think well over 37 of our ex-presidents have been freemasons. Most
members of banking and commerce are members too. Now, the crazy thing is
freemasons technically only started in 1700'something, when a group got
together of the above families and began fermenting a plot to overthrow
the british and french empires. However, most of Freemason architecture
and ritual is based on Egyptology. Some think the same group of people
who ruled Egypt have for centures inter-bred with other important
families around the world to keep a monopoloy on power and economics,
and the freemason culture is how the keep networking and keep their
bloodlines pure. Why? Supposedly, they use types of magic in freemason
ceremonies to keep themselves strong, and pure bloodlines make the magic
more powerful. I know that sounds dumb, and you can ignore that part for
now if you find it unbelievable, but keep reading. (I was in a freemason
church once, sneaking around as part of a janitorial crew. I saw them
doing a ritual, which was extremely weird.)
But get this: Bush, Churchhill, and Rooselvelt all descend from Kind
Edward of England (Longshanks, the guy who killed Braveheart). Bush and
Kerry are actually related. Count Dracula is actually a great
grandfather of Prince Wilhelm of England. Clinton and other presidents
are decendents from Charlamagne. This is no bullshit. I researched it on
ancestry.com. It seems like all the royal bloodlines do remain pretty
close-nit.
Kerry and Bush are also members of the skull and bones society, an
offshoot of the freemasons. Chances are neither Bush nor Kerry are very
advanced members of the skull and bones or freemasons. The highest level is of a 33rd
degree freemason. I doubt either one are up to that level. Yet, they
still maybe pawns of those higher up, really pulling the strings on
their careers.
Here's the big kicker for me. Normally I wouldn't think twice about any
of this shit, and just think it was a bunch of crap. But I was doing
some harmless research on Jehovahs' Witnesses just to reminice about the
old days when I stumbled upon the fact that the founder of JWs, Charles
T. Russell, was an ex-freemason. The Russells are also one of the 13
familys listed as members of the illuminati. All the early watchtowers
and JW books have freemason symbology on the cover. Now, no big deal at
first, right? Wrong. When you combine the goal of freemasonry, or the
illuminati, with the doctrines of Jehovah's Witnesses, you have a
perfect marriage of the two. Basically, the whole goal of JWs is to see
an end to organized religion and goverments. Exactly what the Illuminati
want! So, why not get a group of people brainwashed ahead of time to be
prepared for it. Joseph Smith, the mormon leader, was also a freemason.
Mormons and JWs only differ on certain doctrines, but not the philosophy
in general.
Is there anything to this? Please, this is a serious discussion, I'm not one to normally give much credit to conspiracy theories but anyone whose an ex-jw knows what a mind control experiment it really is.
I"m not advocating that an illuminati exists. I just want to hear the arguments pro or con.