Bizarre news story

by BoozeRunner 118 Replies latest jw friends

  • bigboi
    bigboi

    Kenyata:

    You asked:

    Do you feel that all females that become pregnant, knowing that the daddy won't or can't take care of them and they know they don't have any money either, should automatically have their babies killed?

    I'm just saying there are many extenuating circumstances in relationships regarding children. My point is the woman can decide to give birth to the chld or not. A man does not have that option. So if he does not want the child and can't afford to raise it why should he be required to do so? Just a thought.

    ONE....

    bigboi

    "it ain't what ya do. it's how you do it" quote from the song "True Honeybunz" by Bahamadia

  • LDH
    LDH

    BigBoi--as far as I'm concerned, it's a case of simple mathematics.

    I know MANY people who won't get their male pet sterilized. WHY? Because they don't have to be faced with caring for the litter.

    The same with men. A woman can have one child a year, give or take a couple of months. Too many children, and her life is in danger. In the meantime, a man can father a different child every night, if he so chooses. And just keep walking away. And if the woman's conscience doesn't allow abortions, well, you know what happens.

    It's pure math. Control the producer, not the product of the reproduction.

    As far as the CS not being taxable, flat out don't be dumb. Uncle Sam has laws against double taxation. If the man and woman were living together, she wouldn't pay taxes on it. The whole point is to not penalize the child because the parents are not together.

    In addition, if the father is non-custodial, and has no interest at all in his child, as evidenced by the fact he had to be court ordered to pay child support, the mother claims that child as a dependent. So she gets the money and the tax write-off, yer damn skippy. And you have the nerve to thinks that's selfish? My good friend, you can fuck off. I raised a child on my own for six years before I got married, in the process it took three years to get one penny out of the bastard. And I had a lawyer AND he was being pursued by the county, AND the family court judge knows my family well. What chance does some under-educated, ignorant woman have of really 'socking it to the man.' She doesn't; it's a stereotype.

    As I mentioned, I worked full-time with no welfare benefits of any kind. HELLO BIG BOI. Big fucking deal her biological father pays me some money. I have 24/7 full time responsibility, and anyone who knows me will tell you I don't take parenting lightly. We are both paying for not being careful enough. So please, get off your soap box about these poor men who shoot their sperm in all directions. The whole three years I took care of her needs myself, I didn't hear anyone sympathizing with my situation, complaining that I was spending too much of my own money. So who are you or anyone else to say, I'm spending too much of his money?

    Now if you were paying 25% to Uncle Sam. Then you had another 10% coming out for retirement and insurance that's already more than a third of your pay. Then add on the additional 17% for a kid and that's like half your pay.

    UMMMMMM that's why you work, to take care of your responsibilities. Tell me how it would be one penny less if you and the woman were married and had that child together. The bottom line, properly caring for a child COSTS MONEY There is a very easy way NOT to get children, wear a condom. My husband was 35 when I met him, and he had NO children ANYWHERE. ON PURPOSE. PS, He wasn't celibate before he met me.

    PPS BigBoi, My two attorneys cost me over $10,500, which I didn't get back a penny of.

    Kenyata,
    With all due respect, are you insane? I get the exact same amount of child support, and let me tell you, unless you want to live like a bum, it's not enough for the mother and the child. If it happens to be a larger amount, who gives a shit? Can I help it that I was engaged to a doctor, not a Subway Sandwich Artist?

    that's her fault cause she didn't do her research and get what her kid deserves
    Maybe you didn't read what I wrote. This case was a landmark in NY. It WASN'T her fault she wasn't getting more money; prior to her case all the law cared about was the child getting enough to keep the mother off welfare. This case changed the entire support payment system, because a highly intelligent judge saw that the child was being penalized by a stingy, deceitful man.

    I feel, you go off of what my employer says I make and after taxes, cs and all come out, if I don't have enough to pay my bills, rent, gas,electric, food, bus card or gas, my essential items, its getting lowered.

    You've obviously never been in this situation. As I mentioned, I have. Of course my daughter's father ALSO wanted to go off of his gross income and not his net income. And he wanted to take deductions for everything under the sun. He also came to court prepared to lie, as do most NCPs. The judge on the case asked him for information, which he took out of his wallet. A yellow piece of paper fell out on the table; I thought nothing of it. The judge jumped on it like stink on shit. He asked him, "What is that piece of yellow paper?" "Oh, it's just a scrap, your Honor."

    "Hand it here. I work for the State, and that SURE looks like a NY State pay stub. Hand it here."

    Yes, he was hiding income, and NO ONE knew he was earning an additional $74,000 by moonlighting for the State.... You'd better believe he got it socked right where it hurt, in the pocket. And, I thanked Jehovah that Judge saw that piece of paper.

    So please, folks, you really can't judge someone until you've walked in their shoes.

    --->>>>>And it ISN'T just men who are deadbeats. When I moved to California, my neighbor who became my best friend told me of her husband's situation. Yes, he was paying her CS--$800/month and they were supposed to have joint custody. Only one problem. SHE NEVER PICKED THE GIRLS UP. She had a different excuse every week. After a while, I was like, "Why are you paying this wacky bitch?" AFTER FOUR YEARS he took her back to court, got full custody, and she was ordered to pay him a paltry $174/month for two girls. She quit her job two weeks after money started coming out of her check.

    PPS for anyone going to court, you may be interested to know you can also request that the judge order the NCP to get life insurance and make the children dependents, with the CP a trustee for those funds. That way, if the NCP dies, you are not just relying on his/her Social Security Payments. If the NCP has a better health insurance plan than you have, you should also request that the judge order the NCP to add the dependent children to his/her policy.

    Hope I haven't bored you to death.

    Lisa

  • bigboi
    bigboi

    LDH:

    Ummmm......(gulp).....Uhhhhhhh......

    Nah, seriously though Lisa. Don't take what I'm sayin personal. I don't have any kids. Hopefully I won't until I'm married. I feel what you're saying and I hope my opinions didn't come across as insensitive to single mothers. However, I don't believe that child support should go to women who want to live off their ex's or their baby's dad. Hell a child ain't a mutual fund, you shouldn't be allowed to have someone's kid and get a lifestyle upgrade. It just isn't fair. Now you and I both know that ain't what happens most of the time, but it's pretty close.

    As far as the CS not being taxable, flat out don't be dumb. Uncle Sam has laws against double taxation. If the man and woman were living together, she wouldn't pay taxes on it. The whole point is to not penalize the child because the parents are not together.

    When a man and a woman live together they both contribute to the financial support of the child, at least in most cases. I don't know whether child support is a pre-tax or after-tax deduction so I can't comment on that. I guess you can disregard that, but I did say it was hearsay. I've never heard of a woman being required to list cs as taxable income.

    In addition, if the father is non-custodial, and has no interest at all in his child, as evidenced by the fact he had to be court ordered to pay child support, the mother claims that child as a dependent. So she gets the money and the tax write-off, yer damn skippy. And you have the nerve to thinks that's selfish?

    Never said that. I said it isn't fair to make a man take care of a child if he doesn't want to. I stand by that. Men and women should have the same rights. If a woman doesn't want a child for whatever reason then she has a right to an abortion. If a man doesn't want a child he has no rights, period. That's reality, a fact. Now, I beleive in taking care of your own. Should I have any I will definitely take care of my responsiblity, no doubt. However, that doesn't get rid of the fact that a double standard exists there.

    Tell me how it would be one penny less if you and the woman were married and had that child together. The bottom line, properly caring for a child COSTS MONEY There is a very easy way NOT to get children, wear a condom. My husband was 35 when I met him, and he had NO children ANYWHERE. ON PURPOSE. PS, He wasn't celibate before he met me.

    I don't know anyone that spends 1600 dollars a month on one child. I not saying there aren't certain times where you do spend a lot. But no one spends that much on one kid on a regular basis, unless they're rich and the kids in private school or is sick or something. The same goes fer yourself. Take birth control or something. It takes two to tango, waltz, whatever.

    As I mentioned, I worked full-time with no welfare benefits of any kind. HELLO BIG BOI. Big fucking deal her biological father pays me some money. I have 24/7 full time responsibility, and anyone who knows me will tell you I don't take parenting lightly. We are both paying for not being careful enough.

    Like you mentioned BIG DEAL. You had her, she's your responsibilty, your suppposed to work and take care of your child. The same goes for him. He should pay support as long as it's a fair amount and it isn't subsidizing someone else's lifestyle besides his child.

    Damn, legal fees are a bitch. Ya should've made him pay em for being dishonest with you. I don't feel sorry for deadbeats. I was just attempting to start a bit of a dialogue and bring some things I thought about this issue to front. I know it's tough, my moms and grandmother were both single parents. I know all about cs fights cause my mom had to fight my dad for hers. That doesn't mean I can close my eyes to the double standards though.

    ONE....

    bigboi

    "it ain't what ya do. it's how you do it" quote from the song "True Honeybunz" by Bahamadia

  • LDH
    LDH

    Hey dude,

    I don't know anyone that spends 1600 dollars a month on one child

    Just for you, I have some info regarding how my $20,000+ yearly is spent, on a month by month basis. This month was a good example, so let me start with that.

    1. School expenses. For about 3 years, She went to a Private School which was $750/month, a Montessori Academy. When I moved to CA, the only private shcools where I live were religious based, which I didn't want to do. Therefore she is now in public school.

    a. Breakfast/Lunch/ Snack Bar $50-60/month
    b. Musical Instrument $30/month plus insurance
    c. Sporting equipment/clothing $100/month (includes away games)
    d. Field Trips/Year Books/etc. Add'l $50 month
    e. Lap-top lease, $110/month

    2. Medical Expenses

    a. Health Ins premium, goes up by $129 per month when you add a child
    b. Doctor's office co-pays usually about $30/month
    c. Prescription co-pays usually about $20-30/month
    d. Time off work docked because you have to take care of a sick kid-no day care allows sick kids /2-3 days per month $250+
    e. Over the counter medicine cabinet/ Benadryl Kid tylenol etc $25/month
    f. I live in CA. Kid's sunblock (We have a pool and she ALWAYS has friends in it) $ 15

    3. Dental expenses
    a. Orthodontia, covered by ins. 50% our portion comes to $175 per month. For three years.
    b. Flouride tabs, etc. More RX co-pays $20/month
    c. Monthly trips to the orthodontist. Two hours off work.

    4. Clothing. Need I say more? I am a frugal shopper as I've stated before. I buy everything on sale. At this stage of her growth, she needs new clothing almost monthly. $80-100

    5. Allowance. (Not a necessity, but nice) $5. weekly= $25/month

    6. FOOD. Although not quite a teenage boy, she eats non-stop. Again, I am a very frugal shopper, don't buy prepared foods etc etc. Let's call her portion $125/month

    6.Holiday Expenses. (never had these before I was XJW.)
    a. Count on at least 3 B'day parties a month for a child of 11 years. Each gift, $15. $45.
    b. Christmas, etc etc etc. Plan on $300 for Christmas, and $50 for every other Holiday. These are for her gifts. Gifts for friends will cost us about another $200/every December.

    Hidden expenses (those which you think are free,LOL)
    a. Extra bedroom in home. Increased purchase price by $14,500 Financed, that's about $95/month at the current interest rate.
    b. Child's pets. (Btw. vaccs, spays/neuters/food, avg cost) $50/month
    c. Transportation. (I used to have a slicked out Mustang GT. Now I have a sensible four door family car, five years old --not flashy. Paid off.) Let's call HER portion $120/month. Yes, I spend at least one hour daily shuttling her/and her friends to and fro. That's not only gas, but insurance, and wear and tear.
    d. Life insurance. I maintain PLENTY of life insurance with her as the beneficiary. $75 month.
    e. Home owner's insurance. Let's see, she has a Playstation, a VCR, a TV, a CD BoomBox, about 50 CDs, a whole Furniture set, etc. Her stuff increased our homeowner's ins by about $25/month
    f. Phone expenses. Yes, with all of my relatives in NY and Louisiana, that's $30/month for her to talk to them all.
    g Visitation. Twice a year she goes to NY for a month, to visit both of our families, which we happen to think is very important. Plane tickets avg. $450. That's about another $100 month. Because it's too expensive to escort her, she now flies alone.
    h Entertainment. We try to go to dinner and a movie at least twice a month as a family, or to someplace like Camelot Parks. Her portion is $30/month.
    iWe take family vacations, too. Next week, my hubby and I are going to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. Plane tickets are $463 each. If she were going, that's be another $463. Plus food. Plus a bigger car. Plus recreational activities for a kid, ie. the zoo, etc etc etc. Two years ago we purchased a time-share at a 5 star resort. It had one bedroom. Five months later we had to upgrade to a two bedroom, because it gave us no privacy. Additional $4,600.

    I hope you are getting the picture.

    It ain't cheap to raise a child. It is a stereotype to think I am sitting here getting rich off of money for her. The most expensive part of the equation, MY TIME, I did not even try to put a number to. Regardless of your intentions, it is offensive to be told that 'it doesn't cost $1,600 to raise a child.' Can it be done cheaper? Hell yes. But why should it be done cheaper when it doesn't have to be? It's no greater hardship on his wallet than it is on my time, believe that.

    I didn't even add in the couple of times a week I take her to BK or Wendy's so I don't have to cook and instead, I can talk to her.

    My daughter isn't even a baby, so I didn't have to calculate diapers, formula, etc in there.

    I don't believe that child support should go to women who want to live off their ex's or their baby's dad.
    Although I agree with you here, the only men who are in a position to make their baby's momma's rich singlehandedly are overpaid sports stars and if they don't know how to keep a sock on their dick, they get what's coming to em. They want ghetto'd out women, and they get gold diggers extraordinare. Please don't compare the common woman to those gold digging bitches, it is offensive.

    Love, Lisa

  • LDH
    LDH

    PS BigBoi,

    I am still in awe and shaking my head over the fact that you think a kid under any circumstance could ne a lifestyle upgrade. Unless you doinked Barry Sanders or A-Rod. That's just not the case for the common woman.

    I got lucky, like I told Kenyata. I won't apologize that my daughter's biological father is a doctor, and not a Subway Sandwich Artist. Most women get 17% of minimum wage, and then they are FORCED to find a way to raise a child for less than $1600 a month.

    PS, I forgot about golf expenses. She and my hubby do together, twice a week he takes her to the range, and sometimes to play 9 holes. That's another $10-20/week, plus she needs a new set of clubs now. She's outgrown her old ones. Oh yeah, her rollerblades which she's had for 3 years (we bought the expandable ones for $119) are now too small for her. So she needs another pair.

    See what I mean, BigBoi? The expenses don't stop. Yes she is one of the lucky few. I won't apologize, or knock ANY NCP, be they man or woman, for trying to get what belongs to them.

    And you know what else BigBoi? Having a child has a drastic affect on my income. At least one of us (me/hubby) needs to be working 9-5 so we can be accesible for her, and he can't do it. That leaves me. Never able to stay late, or come in early. You'd better believe that has affected my income. I used to work three jobs.

  • Andee
    Andee

    Ok...here's my two cents.

    Awwwww...poor Daddy has to support HIS child in the same style that HE lives in! Boo Hoo Hoo!

    If he doesn't want to pay up, then let him keep his pants zipped!

    Sorry, rich sports stars get no sympathy from me.

    Mutual fund indeed! Anyone who has raised a child know the absolute
    absurdity of THAT statement.

    Sarcastically Yours,
    Andee

  • COMF
    COMF
    The men would receive $500 a piece

    Gigolos? Interesting, isn't it, how a space alters the meaning. ;)

    I get the exact same amount of child support, and let me tell you, unless you want to live like a bum, it's not enough for the mother and the child.

    Exactly right. It's not supposed to be. It's for the child only. It's to be spent on food, clothing, medical expenses, toys, classes, and other things for the child. It can be spent on decent housing if necessary, or on gasoline or car repairs if the car is necessary to the child's wellbeing. It cannot be spent on clothes for the mother, cigarettes, booze, cosmetics, tanning parlors, or nights on the town. The mother isn't even supposed to eat the food that's bought with the child support money. It's not called "child support" by coincidence.

    If the mother is attending college while living on the child support, she's stealing from the child. It's the kid's money, not hers to spend on her own education. Nor is it hers to spend on her own necessities of life so that she doesn't have to work and therefore can attend college. Attending college is good; more power to those who achieve it. But mooching the kid's money to do it is wrong.

    When Vickie, the mother of my two children, divorced me after five years of marriage, she stipulated in the papers that she would be the one with custody, but she didn't say anything about child support. In court, the judge looked the papers over and asked, "What about child support?" This was not discussed by us beforehand, and I didn't know she would do it, but she said to the judge, "Your honor, I know that Fred loves the boys and he will do what he can to take care of them. I don't want to ask for any certain amount. He'll support them as he's able."

    The judge turned and glared at me as though this had been my idea, and said, "That is unacceptable. Those children are wards of this court now, and it's my duty to see to it that they are properly cared for." And he stipulated an amount I was to pay.

    During the first year we were divorced the boys were with me more often than with her. I claimed them on my income tax because I had day care receipts to show that I had supported them for more than six months out of the year. I would pick them up for their weekend visitation, and come Sunday afternoon she would call and ask if I would mind keeping them a little longer, "just a week or two," while she "got her act together."

    After a year, I knew (she told me) that she had gotten back into drugs and had developed a dependence on speed. She was living from boyfriend to boyfriend, moving from one place to another every few weeks, and (I eventually learned) had gotten into prostitution.

    So I asked her to go back to court and swap places with me, so that the kids legally lived with me and she had visitation rights. She said no, she couldn't do that. So I offered her a thousand dollars to do it. Then she said okay, but only on the condition that she didn't have to pay child support. I said sure, no problem.

    So we had a lawyer draw up the papers, and we went back to court. As luck would have it, it was the same judge who had handled the divorce. And, looking over the papers, again he asked, "What about child support?" This time it was my turn. "Your honor," I said, "I make a decent income. I can take care of the boys okay on my own. I don't need child support."

    The judge looked at her, and looked at me, and shrugged his shoulders and said, "Okay."

    She got a sum of money that probably lasted her about 48 hours. I got 15 years of raising my children in my own home, in my own care. It was the best deal I ever made.

    COMF

    P.S. Having contributed my fair share to the survival of the species (two kids), I bowed out of the fathering business. Blanks. FWIW.

  • claudia
    claudia

    Bigbouy wrote:

    "My point is the woman can decide to give birth to the chld or not. A man does not have that option. So if he does not want the child and can't afford to raise it why should he be required to do so?"

    Bigbouy, Why should the child suffer and/or do without? What the hell is wrong with you? And do you know how many men would use that line? Get real buddy.

  • LDH
    LDH
    . It's not supposed to be. It's for the child only

    Maybe you missed my point COMF. I said what I said:

    I get the exact same amount of child support, and let me tell you, unless you want to live like a bum, it's not enough for the mother and the child.

    about it being not enough for the mother AND the child because another poster earlier talked about $20,000 year being too much for a child's expenses.

    Not Really. I posted what I posted to prove that actual HARD money plus SOFT MONEY can easily amount to $20,000+.

    Have you ever heard of estimates about how much it costs to raise a child?

    I didn't even factor in college savings, etc etc because the $20,000 [g]in my life isn't enough to do that on. Therefore, that is just ONE of the expenses I pay.

    And luckily, judges KNOW that more than HARD dolars are required to raise a child; the NCP's job is to pay child support; it is up to the CP to decide how to use it. Period.

    Even married couples disagree over how to raise the kids. what makes you think some bastard that doesn't live in my life or my world determine how much I should spend on my child?

    That's why NY STATE and hopefully every other state has adopted a formula. Because it does take money to raise a child and not just day care dollars that are easy to track.

    If the mother is attending college while living on the child support, she's stealing from the child

    And if in my case, I had chosen to use some of that money to go to college, you'd better be ducking for cover before telling me I was wrong.

    As I mentioned, I had over $10,500 in legal fees. That was my fucking savings, buddy. Not to mention the $3,000 it cost me (documented) the first year I had her. NONE OF THIS WAS REIMBURSED.

    I don't hear one complaint from the men on this board about how much of my fucking money I've spent[/b], only that myself and women like me owe an accounting for the money received, because the NCP's perceive it's too much money.

    Like hell it is. If I had another $10,000 a year, I could buy her New skis (she outgrew her old ones two years ago) new golf clubs, a snowboard and lessons (which she has been begging for for two years) and on and on and on.....

    You are damn skippy my daughter lives like the child of a wealthy physician, because that's what she is. I only wish other NCPs had as good a situation. But they don't, it's a stereotype to think they are living "the high life." Whatever.

    Andee, I think I like you already! Welcome!

  • COMF
    COMF
    Maybe you missed my point COMF.

    Maybe you missed mine. Did I say anything about you?

    Have you ever heard of estimates about how much it costs to raise a child?

    I don't need estimates. I raised my two. I did it without child support. Maybe you missed that point, too.

    I didn't even factor in college savings, etc etc because the $20,000 [g]in my life isn't enough to do that on.

    I put myself through college while raising my kids and working a 40-hour work week stocking shelves and sacking groceries for $5.30 an hour (in 1990-1993) because that's the only job I could find that would allow me to attend daytime, fulltime college classes. Please don't lecture me about college expenses.

    the NCP's job is to pay child support; it is up to the CP to decide how to use it. Period.

    Spoken like a true recipient, not a payor.

    what makes you think some bastard that doesn't live in my life or my world determine how much I should spend on my child?

    Every bit of the money the courts award your child is supposed to be spent on your child. That's not your exhusband's decision, it's the way it is. I guess you figure a court judge is going to support the idea of a mother buying herself clothes, perfume and beer with child support money? Right.

    And if in my case, I had chosen to use some of that money to go to college, you'd better be ducking for cover before telling me I was wrong.

    You would be a thief.

    NONE OF THIS WAS REIMBURSED.

    That makes it okay to steal your child's money?

    I don't hear one complaint from the men on this board about how much of my fucking money I've spent

    Oh, whine, whine, whine. Give it a rest, please.

    If I had another $10,000 a year

    Then get a job that pays you $10,000 more a year.

    COMF

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit