the bible doesnt mention them at all. so what the hell?
do JWs believe in dinosaurs?
by tsunami_rid3r 118 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
DannyBloem
I asked this to an elder long time ago. The answer: they bible does not say they existed so they did not.
That was a real stupid a$$. My answer: they bible does not say that you exist also.
Anyway, they had a awake with a whole theme about dinasours. They do not deny them. They leave open all important questions though.
Danny
-
greendawn
They obviously can't deny that they existed since there are numerous fossils of many different kinds of dinosaurs but they will dispute the time that they appeared on the earth it can't be hundreds of millions of years ago since they believe animals appeared just tens of thousands of years ago.
-
DannyBloem
They obviously can't deny that they existed since there are numerous fossils of many different kinds of dinosaurs but they will dispute the time that they appeared on the earth it can't be hundreds of millions of years ago since they believe animals appeared just tens of thousands of years ago.
Ohh they can. They completely ignore the neaderthaler and others. Even if they already got DNA from neaderthalers. And anyway, I though that they are very quiet now about the length of ceration days (maybe a wise thing). Although you never here them say millions of years also.
-
MidwichCuckoo
Yes they do, hence Jaraczic Park.
-
Hellrider
LoL, I asked my mother that question once, after I left. She said she believed God maybe created them before man, to "fertilize the earth", I think she meant with their bodies when they died, not the (huge) amount of fecies they produced. I thought wtf, why couldn`t God just have fertilized it himself, it would have been much easier to just create lots of crap, than create living beings, so I asked her that too. She said, "well, maybe God needed to practise creation before he made Adam". Well, so much for omnipotence. I would never have thought an omnipotent God would need to "practice his skills". Also, if God made dinosaurs before the other animals and man, why aren`t they mentioned in the creation, somewhere in between "God created the heavens and the earth" and "God created the birds and beasts etc" (or whatever that passage read)? It could have been, of course, that they existed and were parts of "the animals", and that there was no room for them in Noahs ark (due to their size), but that would mean that Adam would have had to walk around naming the dinosaurs too. "Hm, well you sure are a big fellow, I think I`ll call you Tyrannosaurus re...AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"
-
blondie
Here are some comments about dinosaurs from 1973 and 1990. w73 7/15 p. 447 Questions from Readers
• When did God create dinosaurs, and when did they become extinct?—U.S.A.
The Bible does not provide specific answers to this question. According to the Genesis account, animals were created during the fifth and sixth creative periods or ‘days.’ If the Hebrew expression translated "great sea monsters" [Hebrew, tan·ni·nim´] includes dinosaurs, which often inhabited swampy, watery areas, this would mean that dinosaurs were created on the fifth "day." (Gen. 1:21) We do not know whether they continued to exist until man was created (toward the close of the sixth "day"). At the very latest it seems likely that they must have disappeared off the earth at the time of the flood of Noah’s day. Dinosaurs were reptiles, and some kinds of dinosaurs bear strong resemblance structurally and otherwise to lizards (sauros is, in fact, the Greek word for "lizard"; saura in Leviticus 11:29, LXX). Not all types of dinosaurs were of such gigantic size. Hence, even if they had survived till the Flood, this would not have required taking pairs of the mammoth varieties into the ark. Other smaller members of the particular family or "kind" to which these belonged would have sufficed to fulfill the divine command.—Gen. 6:19, 20; 7:14.
Some of the older translations of the Bible at times use the word "dragons" to translate the Hebrew tan·ni·nim´ ("sea monsters," NW). (Ps. 74:13; 148:7; Isa. 27:1, Authorized Version) The term "dragon" (Greek, dra´kon) is found in the Christian Greek Scriptures. It has been suggested as possible that, rather than having a purely mythical source, this expression may originally have been applied to enormous creatures such as the dinosaurs, taking on mythical tones only after these mammoth creatures had long disappeared. Interestingly, many of the mythical depictions of the "dragon" strongly resemble certain types within the family of huge reptilian creatures that includes the dinosaur.
g90 2/8 pp. 9-11 What Happened to the Dinosaurs?"PALAEONTOLOGY is the study of fossils, and fossils are the remains of life from past ages." But as one paleontologist said, it is "a highly speculative and opinionated science." This is evident regarding dinosaurs. Listing some speculations as to what happened to them, Princeton scientist G. L. Jepson stated:
"Authors with varying competence have suggested that dinosaurs disappeared because the climate deteriorated . . . or that the diet did. . . . Other writers have put the blame on disease, parasites, . . . changes in the pressure or composition of the atmosphere, poison gases, volcanic dust, excessive oxygen from plants, meteorites, comets, gene pool drainage by little mammalian egg-eaters, . . . cosmic radiation, shift of Earth’s rotational poles, floods, continental drift, . . . drainage of swamp and lake environments, sunspots."—The Riddle of the Dinosaur.
It is apparent from such speculations that scientists are not able, with any certainty, to answer the question: What happened to the dinosaurs?
Sudden
Extinction TheoryA more recent theory was put forth by a father-and-son team, Luis and Walter Alvarez. Walter Alvarez discovered, outside the town of Gubbio in central Italy, a curious thin, red layer of clay sandwiched between two limestone layers in the rock formation. The lower layer of limestone yielded an abundance of fossils. The top layer was almost devoid of fossils, leading the geologists to conclude that life suddenly disappeared and that the thin, red layer of clay had some connection with the extinction.
Analysis revealed that the clay was rich in iridium (a metal), 30 times richer than the concentration normally found in rocks. They knew that such high concentrations of this rare element could come only from the earth’s core or from sources outside the earth. They concluded that the iridium was deposited by a huge asteroid that hit the earth, causing the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs.
After the discovery of the iridium-enriched clay at Gubbio, similar deposits were found in other parts of the world. Did this corroborate the asteroid hypothesis? Some scientists remain skeptical. But as the book The Riddle of the Dinosaur acknowledges, the Alvarez hypothesis added "fresh yeast to the study of extinction and evolution." And paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould admits that it could diminish "the importance of competition between species."
Commenting on this new theory and the apparently sudden extinction of the dinosaurs, one science writer admits: "They could shake the foundations of evolutionary biology and call into question the current concept of natural selection."
University of Arizona scientist David Jablonski concludes that ‘for many plants and animals, extinction was abrupt and somehow special. Mass extinctions are not merely the cumulative effects of gradual dyings. Something unusual happened.’ Their arrival was also abrupt. Scientific American observes: "The sudden appearance of both suborders of the pterosaurs without any obvious antecedents is fairly typical of the fossil record." That is also the case with dinosaurs. Their relatively sudden appearance and disappearance contradicts the commonly accepted view of slow evolution.
The
Dating of DinosaursDinosaur bones are regularly found in lower earth layers than are human bones, leading many to conclude that they belong to an earlier time period. Geologists call this time the Mesozoic period and subdivide it into the Cretaceous, Jurassic, and Triassic periods. The time frames used for these periods are on the order of tens of millions of years. But has this been established with any certainty?
One method being used to measure the age of fossils is called radiocarbon dating. This dating system measures the rate of decay of radioactive carbon from the point of death of the organism. "Once an organism dies, it no longer absorbs new carbon dioxide from its environment, and the proportion of the isotope falls off over time as it undergoes radioactive decay," states Science and Technology Illustrated.
However, there are severe problems with the system. First, when the fossil is considered to be about 50,000 years old, its level of radioactivity has fallen so low that it can be detected only with great difficulty. Second, even in more recent specimens, this level has fallen so low that it is still extremely difficult to measure accurately. Third, scientists can measure the present-day rate of radioactive carbon formation but have no way of measuring carbon concentrations in the distant past.
So whether they use the radiocarbon method for dating fossils or other methods, such as employing radioactive potassium, uranium, or thorium, for dating rocks, scientists are unable to establish the original levels of those elements through ages of time. Thus, professor of metallurgy Melvin A. Cook observes: "One may only guess these concentrations [of radioactive materials], and the age results thus obtained can be no better than this guess." That would especially be so when we consider that the Flood of Noah’s day over 4,300 years ago brought enormous changes in the atmosphere and on earth.
Dartmouth College geologists Charles Officer and Charles Drake further add doubt to the accuracy of radioactive dating. They state: "We conclude that iridium and other associated elements were not deposited instantaneously . . . but rather that there was an intense and variable influx of these constituents during a relatively short geologic time interval on the order of 10,000 to 100,000 years." They argue that the breakup and movement of the continents disrupted the entire globe, causing volcanic eruptions, blocking sunlight and fouling the atmosphere. Certainly, such disruptive events could change radioactivity levels, thus distorting results from modern-day radioactive clocks.
The
Genesis Account and DinosaursWhile the radioactive dating method is innovative, it is still based on speculation and assumption. In contrast, the Bible account in the first chapter of Genesis simply states the general order of creation. It allows for possibly thousands of millions of years for the formation of the earth and many millenniums in six creative eras, or "days," to prepare the earth for human habitation.
Some dinosaurs (and pterosaurs) may indeed have been created in the fifth era listed in Genesis, when the Bible says that God made "flying creatures" and "great sea monsters." Perhaps other types of dinosaurs were created in the sixth epoch. The vast array of dinosaurs with their huge appetites would have been appropriate considering the abundant vegetation that evidently existed in their time.—Genesis 1:20-24.
When the dinosaurs had fulfilled their purpose, God ended their life. But the Bible is silent on how he did that or when. We can be sure that dinosaurs were created by Jehovah for a purpose, even if we do not fully understand that purpose at this time. They were no mistake, no product of evolution. That they suddenly appear in the fossil record unconnected to any fossil ancestors, and also disappear without leaving connecting fossil links, is evidence against the view that such animals gradually evolved over millions of years of time. Thus, the fossil record does not support the evolution theory. Instead, it harmonizes with the Bible’s view of creative acts of God.
[Blurb on page 10]The fossil record of the dinosaurs supports not evolution but creation
-
greendawn
Danny and MC I never realise they deny such obvious facts, what do they have to say about the fossils in museums and the Neanderthal skeletons?
-
Elsewhere
Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. It depends on what the Watchtower tells them to believe at any given moment.
-
greendawn
Are the dubs that ignorant? It's like refusing to accept that the sun goes round the earth, are all the fossils fake?