dust

Joined

• started 7 topics
• posted 163 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by dust

• 
  12

  Now it is real: Generation U-turn

  by pElE the King in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hello folks, .

  i've been alway for long time!

  i am currently living in london with my family.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  So, the Bible is a riddle.
  
  riddle: a question or statement intentionally phrased so as to require ingenuity in ascertaining its answer or meaning, typically presented as a game.
• 
  131

  Why are we telling Iran they can't have nukes?

  by mavie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  watching the democratic debates i was struck how every candidate, save dennis kucinich, pledged to prevent iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

  iran is a sovereign state, diplomacy which ends in 'you can't have this, but we can' will not work.

  what would happen if another country told us we couldn't have nukes?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  We all know that the only country that is qualified to have nukes is the one that has shown that they know how to use them. ;)
• 
  34

  I know another poster!!!

  by purplesofa in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i think this poster and i met online in 2001. early 2002, a jw girlfriend of mine came over from australia, i had a "get-together" at my house for some of us chatters from about.com.

  i think that is where we chatted then.

  i am not sure if it was shut down at that time or not.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  I always think it's fun when purplesofa writes things like this:

  Two have slept on the purple sofa!!!
• 
  177

  Jehovah's Witness here.

  by nimzo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i have a question about my religion.

  when people turn apostate, why do they seem kinda... weird.

  they turn back to false teachings and their bible knowledge even proves that.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  nimzo wrote:

  Translating to "Word was God" actually destroys the Greek Grammar.

  nimzo, you are obviously one who knows your stuff. As I finally get to see an expert here, I would like to make use of this opportunity to ask you about something that I do not understand. I am sure you can help.
  
  In John 1:1 "theos" is translated to "a god" in the NWT, as there is no article in the Greek text. The Watchtower Society states the same as you: Translating to "God" would destroy the Greek grammar.
  
  Then why does the NWT translate John 1:6 and 1:12 to "God" even though the Greek text in the Kingdom Interlinear quite obviously does not have an article there? I suppose that either John or the NW translators did not know Greek grammar: one of them is inconsistent, but who?
  
  Well, I read that you left. You'll probably not read this anyway.
• 
  33

  Refute anti-gay Bible verses

  by cloudblue in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  anyone done some research to refute the handful of anti-gay verses in the bible?

  i've done a bit of research on the net.

  i don't have the links handy, but most of them centered around the assertion that the original words in those passages were mis-translated.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  1 Tim 1:5 (NWT): "Really the objective of this mandate is love out of a clean heart and out of a good conscience and out of faith without hypocrisy."
  
  This is the background for the catalogue of sins in verses 9-11. This catalogue is interesting not because it includes "men who lie with males" (verse 10), but because it in the light of this context tells us what were considered good illustrations of such things that people might do if they did not have a "clean heart".
  
  In the same catalogue of sins, Paul mentions both lawless persons, unruly ones, kidnappers, liars and more. But now imagine that you are "unruly" and refuse to obey the one who asks you to do something bad. (Other examples from the same catalogue of sins can be made easily.)
  
  Would this unruliness be considered to be of the kind that Paul thought of, when we know that you disobeyed due to pure love (verse 5), disregarding the consequences you might face yourself?
  
  Most people would say no.
  
  The "sins" listed by Paul are only illustrations of actions that would typically be considered indications that love was not the motivating factor. These "sins" are sins not because of the actions they involve. They are sins when they illustrate lack of love. (Just as it was no sin to gather food or cure someone "unlawfully" on the sabbath, Matt 12.)
  
  Then why make an exception for one of the illustrations, and claim: this is a sin whatsoever, whether it is an act of love or an act of lovelessness?
• 
  53

  My sisters wedding...

  by zamora251978 in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  below is a copy of the e-mail my sister sent me.

  i had to make arrangements for my kids to be babysat somewhere else until after the wedding.

  there little hearts are broken.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  Yep, I have to talk to my dad and see if he is going to walk me down the aisle. If not I am getting my uncle as a back up.

  My wife walked alone, and it was beautiful. Not a single dry eye in the church.
• 
  74

  my JW boyfriend wants reinstatement. What do i do

  by worldly girl81 in

  1. social
  2. relationships

  for the past 5 months i have been in a wonderful relationship.

  he and i had started out as friends a few years ago, but realized that we were attracted to each other while he was going through his divorce earlier this year.

  he and his now ex wife are both jws .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  For the record, there are some ISPs that do use NAT or web proxies. Now, this is probably not a big deal, but firefly has been accused in public. So someone with access to the actual IP address might want to perform a reverse DNS lookup and explore the possibility of NAT/proxy in this case. If the httpd logs User-Agent information, this could also give some clues.
  
  Anyway, I suppose I am only curious. :)
• 
  23

  May I Use Your Computer for a Minute?

  by journey-on in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  scenario: your jw sister and her elder husband drop by for a brief visit after service.

  way to meet some of "the friends" for a get together and decide since they're in the neighborhood, they.

  will drop in for a few minutes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  Let them use another browser.
• 
  21

  Is that a snake in my toilet?

  by Uzzah in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i know where some of your minds went with this topic name but ... just in time for all the horror movies and halloween scares ..... .

  woman in shock after 7-foot python peeps through her toiletthursday october 18, 2007 this sounds like a made-up story just in time for halloween.

  but everyone's nightmare really happened to a new york city woman and she's still struggling to get over it.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  You know, I really want to add a comment here about snakes observed in my toilet. But the comment that I'd like to add probably stinks. So I'll stop right now.
• 
  32

  FORGIVENESS

  by tula in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  are you obligated to forgive someone.

  ......if they do not ask for forgiveness.

  ......if they show no remorse for the transgression.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  dust

  Forgiving is not the same as forgetting. To forgive is to not hold something against someone. It is to say that "you don't have to pay your debt, it's OK, relax".
  
  Forgiveness is a gift. It can't be bought. If the debt needs to be repaid or recompensed before one forgives, then it isn't forgiveness, as forgiveness implies (as I just said) that the debt doesn't have to be paid. Noone "deserves" to be forgiven. That's why noone can demand to be forgiven, but sure they can ask for it if they want to. To say "forgive me" means "please, don't ask me to repay my debt".
  
  However, if asking for forgiveness is a CONDITION that has to be fulfilled before being forgiven, then forgiveness actually becomes something that one buys or that one receives because one deserves it. This kind of forgiveness would be to demand repayment, and "forgiveness" becomes only a receipt for repaid debt.