Spike. Don't make me laugh! Get real!
How much does it take for you to realise that you have to put so much 'spin' on all these 'irregularities' for want of a better phrase? The more I hear the less it makes sense and I guess I'm not alone in this. What I fail to realise is how people can give some sort of rationale to this type of reasoning. Some sort of test? What do you mean? I have to equate all this with the simple understanding of "his commandments are not burdensome". Then you come out with this baloney!
I have no problem with sisters doing these things as long as it doesn't demean the brothers within their own (JW) code. There are many women more than capaple of doing these tasks. But, if the Society decides they shouldn't be then you have to question the 'code' by which arrive at such decisions.
You have a typical case whereby the 'lesser congregational lights' are not able to question or query what the 'greater lights' are doing for fear of losing any respect or priviledge they do have. What a ridiculous state of affairs.
Next they'll be counselling the sisters, removing their priviledges cos they have a beard! Or, perhaps, their hair is covering their ears!