Hi Penn--
Don't worry, I have no intention of trying to get into a brawl with you or anything.
:Julie said- Minus the high tech stuff and I see all things that God himself supposedly had "his people" do to others. You are right--not very enlightened and I would expect more from God at least.
:Red Herring!! Red Herring!!!!
I see what you are getting at Penn but I was under the impression that you are of the school of thought that without God there cannot be morality and enlightenment. Perhaps I am mistaken?
:But, come now Julie, let us reason together
Ok, I'm up for reasoning with anyone who is lucid, and you strike me as lucid.
:Well my point was, there is tremendous moral decline in socitey, and gave a few examples. I was wondering how this fits into the 'We are becoming more enlightened' subject, but was not implying that I would be ignoring all of history. I could have given a myriad of examples, I chose one.
I see. I do not think that the school massacres you refer to are as commonplace as they seem. For every kid who has that mindset there are hundreds if not thousands who do not.
:I thought your definition of enlightenment was based on more of a spiritual meaning. Of course we have more information now than we did 100 years ago. Are progressively becoming better? That is where we vary.
Indeed I think we are. There are a lot of people out there who are studying human behavior and why it is what it is. We no longer believe people are "born bad" or that they have "the devil" in them. We realize behaviors are learned and are results of the environment we grow up in. It is slow going, granted, but we are learning. Another thing we have learned that I consider most enlightened is that keeping people in line with fear is not the way to go (especially with children). Fearing God's wrath or a beating from mom or dad is not good "discipline". Learning the consequences of our actions will determine the way things go is much more enlightened than blaming or crediting God with how things are in our lives.
Julie-Though I can see where your "What do you think about the state of the world today....?" approach (which btw, is a commom JW opener too when out schlepping JW mags)
:I am not a JW nor have I ever been one.
I do know this because I saw another post of yours that said so. I was still struck by the similarity of your opener and that of "dubs on the doors".
:People kiiling in the name of Jesus were not obeying the commands of the Bible. They are what the Bible calls hypocrites. Or to put in in a modern vernacular, pretenders. So basically, all the people you point to in discust over Christianity are pretenders and not even Christian in the first place. Jesus said you would know His followers by their love. Hmm, something about killing someone for not converting to Christianity seems to be a bit unloving.
I agree with you Penn, I have never seen anything attributed to Jesus that condoned slaughtering others. I have seen in the NT where it says all scripture is holy though. There is plenty of scripture that instructs believers to slaughter "infidels". I have often thought Christianity would be much more palatable if it didn't include the OT. I find the OT to be completely irreconcilable to a notion/message of peace and love. It is also the picture of unenlightenment. I read secular books on human behavior that are far more enlightened.
:Anyway Julie, I appreciate the conversation, but something tells me that we are not going to change each others views. Feel free to comment though if you like. Have a nice day :) :)
Well thank you Penn, I hope you have a good day/evening too.
I will always contend that people doing things merely for the benefit of the greater good is much more enlightened than those doing things out of fear (or for reward i.e. heaven)of anyone, even their version of God.
Regards--
Julie
P.S. Brigette--you make some good observations. I enjoy your posts.