Hi Faithful Witness, My problem with using the WTBTS's definitions of cult is that it is the WTBTS's definition and not defined by independent cult experts. Since the WTBTS does not believe in higher education, believes in studying WTBTS propagand more than the Bible, and prints/distributes propaganda as well as holds several weekly indoctination sessions for JWs, when/how did the leaders/writers of the WTBTS become "Trusted" experts to defining what constitutes a cult? They belong to a dangerous cult!!
From my point of view the WTBTS uses "Theologic Warfare Strategy" (i.e., deceit and/or obsfucation) to refute its own definitions, such as writing "Some think of a cult as being a dangerous religious sect with a human leader.". Who are the some who think of a cult as being a dangerous religious sect with only one human leader? WTBTS writers/leaders are who. Why can't the GB be viewed as a single leader at the top of a hierarchical organization since only the GB can elect/remove members to/from it instead of being elected/removed by all JWs through elections? Also, the WTBTS's definition does not even define what makes a sect dangerous.
IMHO an organization/sect is dangerous whenever it uses BITE control techniques to victimize its members to follow its leaders, or when it takes actions to protect the organization's image to the deteriment of its members' basic human rights and welfare.
Peace be with you and everyone, who you love,
Robert