I'm kind of interested in this file: Workbook to Assist with Conscience Matters on Blood but I can't access it as I am not a member.
Can anyone help me with that?? Send me a PM please.
http://jwtalk.net/forums/topic/10308-no-junk-mail/#entry160215 .
I'm kind of interested in this file: Workbook to Assist with Conscience Matters on Blood but I can't access it as I am not a member.
Can anyone help me with that?? Send me a PM please.
pedophiles knocking .
in a nutshell, it points out why the general public should be leery of jehovahs witnesses knocking at the front door.
my article is titled pedophiles knocking and is available at: http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2013/07/pedophiles-knocking.html.
EdenOne:
Scully, I've read many reports of paedophile cases perpetrated by JW's. I don't recall a single one perpetrated by a JW while on the door-to-door ministry upon children of the household. I simply don't recall a single one. Perhaps you can remember one?
You don't know how the psychology of paedophiles works. They are PREDATORS. They seek out vulnerable targets. They learn when their targets are most vulnerable. They groom their targets to feel safe around them, to accept and trust them. They are extremely patient. They don't introduce themselves and then immediately sexually assault a child. No, they take their time because the grooming and the "game" excites them - they know how they want their interaction with their target to turn out, but their target doesn't. They fantasize and meticulously plan how they are going to seduce their target, the same way a con artist scams people out of their money.
The contact they make with families and children through the Door-to-Door Ministry™ is only the beginning, just like the JW recruitment (Studying the Bible™) process, grooming a target takes time and patience.
So, I agree with you - the Door-to-Door Ministry™ is not the venue paedophiles use to commit child sexual abuse. It is part of their hunting grounds.
Common Attributes of Child Molesters:
-- from A Profile of the Child Molester
in·sin·u·ate verb \in-'sin-y?-?wat, -yü-?at\
in·sin·u·at·edin·sin·u·at·ing
Definition of INSINUATEtransitive verb
1a : to introduce (as an idea) gradually or in a subtle, indirect, or covert way <insinuate doubts into a trusting mind> b : to impart or suggest in an artful or indirect way : imply <I resent what you're insinuating>
2: to introduce (as oneself) by stealthy, smooth, or artful means
intransitive verb
1archaic : to enter gently, slowly, or imperceptibly : creep
2archaic : to ingratiate oneself
Similarly:
in·sid·i·ous adjective \in-'si-de-?s\
Definition of INSIDIOUS1a : awaiting a chance to entrap : treacherous b : harmful but enticing : seductive <insidious drugs>
2a : having a gradual and cumulative effect : subtle <the insidious pressures of modern life> b of a disease : developing so gradually as to be well established before becoming apparent
Common Child Molester Strategies:
-- from A Profile of the Child Molester
pedophiles knocking .
in a nutshell, it points out why the general public should be leery of jehovahs witnesses knocking at the front door.
my article is titled pedophiles knocking and is available at: http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2013/07/pedophiles-knocking.html.
EdenOne
If you were a gipsy and I wrote an article titled "Gipsy Paedophiles", would you not feel offended by the blanket statement, even if the content was discussing only a few cases among the ethnical group?
Except the title of his article is "Pedophiles Knocking" not "JW Pedophiles".
Personally, I think it only fair to the general public to make them aware that some JWs may be knocking on their doors with ulterior motives, other than the obvious one of trying to gain converts to their belief system.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/07/16-5.
also, snowden - who i believe history will look upon favorably.
when you grow up as a witness, it can be hard to imagine anyone sacrificing themselves for humanity.
I wouldn't be surprised if he ended up being assasinated.
my wife is pregnant and came across this little jem on the internet.
so should elders start going around and testing mothers breast milk?
and if found shouldn't we disfellowshipp the mother?
There's no point in testing breast milk for blood components because it's well established that one of benefits of breastfeeding is the transference of immune properties (immunoglobulins).
A lot of people fail to logically compute how milk is produced. This is highly simplistic, but it conveys the process sufficiently for most new severely sleep deprived parents to understand.
Nutrients in by mouth --> digested in stomach --> absorbed by intestines --> enter the bloodstream --> blood circulates to mammary glands + stimulation by prolactin and oxytocin from hypothalamus + demands of hungry infant ==> milk production.
Leukocytes are present in all milk produced by mammals (humans and cattle included).
The World Health Organization would have a field day if the WTS ever dared to tell JWs that they couldn't breast feed their babies, or give them milk of any kind. I mean, even the Bible says that " like newborn babies, long for the pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation" (1Pet 2:2 ASV).
Besides, breast is best for the WTS, it means spending less money on formula and being able to put those savings in the Contribution Box™.
if there's one scripture that defines the entire purpose of a jehovah's witness's existence, it's matthew 24:14.
"this good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come.".
this is the entire purpose of going door to door.
Nos, earlier in the year there was a thread about one of the ASL videos that the WTS made that had some graphic content about masturbation.
Unfortunately, the WTS was so embarrassed by our critique they took it down, but someone had the forethought to make some GIFs for posterity.
Scroll down a little to catch them: http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/members/adult/235152/15/wts-made-a-video-about-masturbation-IN-SIGN-LANGUAGE-WITH-GESTURES
and save it to YouTube with "modern translation". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytYykOop6HI
Seriously, the WTS isn't doing itself any favors by being on the internet. LOL
And even Worldly People™ found it hilarious:
would any of us defend the right of a medicine manufacturer to advertise curative powers without side effects when evidence to the contrary was indicated?.
would any of us defend the right of a pharmacist to make up his own prescriptions and pass it off as what our physician specifically gave to us?.
would any of us approve equal time for tv advertisers to promote products as effective which had repeatedly proved to be dangerous?.
Sosoconfused
The claim of "embarrassment" was in the actual document instigating the lawsuit, which I found rather amusing actually. I mean, if you are claiming copyright infringement, what's the point of adding "embarrasment" to your suit. Copyright infringement isn't about subjective / emotional results like embarrassment or being made a laughingstock - it's pretty clear-cut, yes-or-no objectively demonstrable.
Clearly the WTS was pissed that their own words were being used to demonstrate, quite effectively, that they were NOT bearers of truth at all, and they were only too happy to use the legal system to bully one really terrific person into silence.
Shouldn't that be "BS = Celestial Education"?
Just sayin'... it's more honest. ;)
Cooking steak on the bbq, potato salad, green salad and veggies.
Might even have a cold one too.
talk about doing a 180* change!!
my husband after much thought went and passed for the police academy.
never would i have ever imagined my jw husband now becoming a police officer.
Oubliette- I thought a witness could not carry a gun or have government jobs?
There are plenty of JWs where I live who work for the government. Decent wages, benefits and job security.
There are also plenty of JWs - some of my own relatives in fact - who use guns for hunting. Carrying a weapon as part of your job is discouraged, because there's a chance that you could become "bloodguilty" in a shooting, but that's such a bogus excuse - because you become just as "bloodguilty" when you are inactive in the Preaching Work™, or if you deprive your husband of his Marital Due™ and he goes out and commits adultery because he just can't keep it in his pants.