Penton was an angry man. He's not in heaven like he thought he would be. The thing about being mild tempered is in play there.
Rattigan350
JoinedPosts by Rattigan350
-
33
Historian and former JW Jim Penton dies
by slimboyfat ini don’t know a lot about james penton but i think he deserves a better thread than the one currently on offer.
james penton, who died recently, grew up in a jw family in canada and served as an elder.
unusually for a jw, he studied liberal arts at university and became a history professor.
-
-
-
18
Meeting attendance
by Farmer Jim1 infor those still in the organization what is your meeting attendance like these days?.
when i left in 2017 there were around 80 publishers and the average meeting attendance was 70..
-
-
Rattigan350
I attend all of the meetings because that is how I can show off my brilliance.
-
51
The unending and fruitless argument on Trinity
by Longlivetherenegades inthose who say they are christians or follow christianity needs .
1. father .
2. jesus .
-
-
Rattigan350
Sea Breeze, why do you all have to bring in these unscriptural, made up diagrams?
Body, Soul and Spirit???? What does that have to do with anything?
Don't you know that it is Body + spirit = living soul.
If you can't get that even right...
In John 2:19 Jesus did not predict that he would raise himself from the dead, because Acts said that God raised him up. And if he could raise himself from the dead, he wasn't dead.
Stop focusing on the words that were written because the words could have been said or written wrongly. Yes, Jesus said a bunch of crazy stuff that the apostles didn't understand and they may not have recorded it properly.
So learn the mechanics of how things work and that won't be a problem.
-
16
Explanation for changes to Disfellowshipping rules at Annual Meeting
by Listener inwally, a youtuber from jw thoughts highlighted something that was said by kenneth cook jnr in the annual meeting.
he thinks it may be removed before they publish the agm.
i doubt we would see it in writing either.. part of kenneth's talk was about the changes regarding disfellowshipping and the clip from jw thoughts youtube shows him saying -.
-
-
Rattigan350
The thing that no one gets is that the disfellowshipping thing comes from 1 Corinthians. Paul's letter to a congregation 2000 years ago. Why are we reading and making policy from one man's letter to another congregation from that long ago?
Wouldn't it have to be something from the apostles and older men (which they call the governing body of that time) and they would make a declaration and that would be sent to all of the congregations?
-
171
Alteration of Revelation 3:14 in the 4th century to support the emerging Trinity doctrine
by slimboyfat inin an earlier thread another poster asserted that there is no evidence that revelation 3:14 played a part in the 4th controversy that led to the trinity doctrine.
this was claimed as evidence that the description of jesus as “the beginning of the creation of god” in the verse was not understood to mean that jesus was god’s first creation.
the scholarly greek–english lexicon of the new testament & other early christian literature 3e (2001) by bauer, arndt, gingrich, and danker, in its latest edition states that “first creation” is indeed the probable meaning of the greek phrase.
-
-
Rattigan350
Jesus being the first or beginning of God's creation would go along with his being the only-begotten son of God.
It's that simple. No need for 8 pages of comments.
-
73
JWN, 23 years posting Blondie
by blondie incan i call you friends, i think so after 23 years posting here.
i am dismayed how jwn is being "dominated" or taken over by a few posters, peppering the comments.
in the past, the admin did not approve of this and did remove some posters from jwn.
-
-
Rattigan350
"People are pissed because it affected their whole lives"
Why? Whose fault is that?
It's nice to blame others for our choices. I know. I've looked in my past from 40 years ago and if so many things have happened differently then my life would be so much better today. But I don't know if I can say better, it would be different. I can blame God because he should know what the future holds. But the decisions ultimately were mine.
Also, unlike so many Witnesses who want the kingdom to come because they want Jehovah to fix all of their problems, I have never been one to look to the kingdom like that. I have this life to live , I'm good with it and then when that is done, I'll live the next one. The kingdom has so many unknowns, that I'd rather go with what I know.
-
73
JWN, 23 years posting Blondie
by blondie incan i call you friends, i think so after 23 years posting here.
i am dismayed how jwn is being "dominated" or taken over by a few posters, peppering the comments.
in the past, the admin did not approve of this and did remove some posters from jwn.
-
-
Rattigan350
TonusOH. No one lied to you. Just because a writer in the past had more faith of expectation than actually happened, does not make it a lie.
Lie -
1 - to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 - to create a false or misleading impression
The writers in the past did neither to create a lie. They didn't create false or misleading impressions just because it didn't happen. I understand that which is why I'm not bothered by anything they printed in the past. The writers' faith is the writers' faith and I've never ridden on their coattails.
-
7
FOR ACTIVE JW's: January 2025 Study Watchtower: Where is JESUS?
by BoogerMan indidn't jehovah assign christ all power & authority?
so why no mention of him?.
from the january 2025 study watchtower: .
-
-
Rattigan350
Why are you making an issue out of something that is not a problem?
The yeartext is from the Psalms where there was not Jesus yet. So how can it mention him?
FYI, In Acts 1:6 Jesus said "you will be witnesses of me in Jerusalem, in all Ju·deʹa and Sa·marʹi·a, and to the most distant part of the earth" because the people to whom he was speaking, actually witnessed him say and do things.
Thus it would not apply to us today, because we didn't witness him do or say anything. Reading it in a book does not make any of us witnesses to what Jesus said and did. It's hard to believe that people don't understand that simple concept. Which is a totally different concept from Isaiah 43:10-12 of being Witnesses of Jehovah. But hey, people will complain just to complain.
-
60
1/25 WT: Oral and Anal sex are a go - if she's ok with it
by neat blue dog inhe will not pressure her to engage in sexual acts that make her feel uncomfortable, that are demeaning, or that bother her conscience..... the bible does not provide details as to what sexual practices between a husband and a wife should be considered clean or unclean.
a christian couple must make decisions that reflect their resolve to honor jehovah, to please each other, and to maintain a clean conscience.
generally speaking, a couple would not discuss with others this intimate aspect of their marriage..
-
-
Rattigan350
"This was a problem in my marriage. Elders telling us what was acceptable."
Why were you seeking advise or listening to the elders?
-
60
1/25 WT: Oral and Anal sex are a go - if she's ok with it
by neat blue dog inhe will not pressure her to engage in sexual acts that make her feel uncomfortable, that are demeaning, or that bother her conscience..... the bible does not provide details as to what sexual practices between a husband and a wife should be considered clean or unclean.
a christian couple must make decisions that reflect their resolve to honor jehovah, to please each other, and to maintain a clean conscience.
generally speaking, a couple would not discuss with others this intimate aspect of their marriage..
-
-
Rattigan350
"With this comment, they are saying if his decisions make her feel uncomfortable, are demeaning or that bother her conscience he should not pressure her to agree to them."
That's called love.
1 Peter 3:7 "You husbands, in the same way, continue dwelling with them according to knowledge. Assign them honor as to a weaker vessel, the feminine one,"
But then sex is not fun unless it is naughty.