This may or may not come as a surprise to some of you, but in many cases I support unions and their workers, most notably in the construction trades. After twenty-five years of financial managment in the real estate industry I have a fair amount of background on the matter. As I told one employer a couple of years ago, we can pay them to do it right or we can pay somebody else to do it over. When I'm paying out on a $100,000 contract, I'd like to know the workers know what they're doing.
The above comment was prompted by the discovery that the plumbers were fixing pipes with duct tape. I'm only the accountant but I'm pretty sure that doesn't meet code.
The trade unions have done a good job of training their people through apprentice programs, and the contracts require the majority of work to be performed or supervised by journeymen.
Just for the record, I don't shop at Walmart for a variety of reasons, worker treatment is one of them. The two grocery stores I frequent (Safeway and a local outfit called Central Market) are both Union shops. The other one near me, Fred Meyer (Kroger for you in the midwest) is a demonstration that being in a union is not the only thing that makes workers happy. I don't know what's wrong with them, but I hate going into the place.
As far as collective bargaining, the relationship between workers and unions encourages negotiation. The workers don't get paid while they're on strike, and my employer will be losing money while the project isn't getting built. Eventually the mutual pain leads to deal and we all get back to work.
Rightly or wrongly, there is a perception that this dynamic does not apply in the case of public sector unions. For example, a few years ago there was a VERY bitter school strike not far from Seattle. The teachers were out for 50 days. When it was finally over, they recovered all of their money (because state law requires a set number of school days for the year) and the students made up the lost days on Saturdays or something (and on into the summer.
The private sector unions have a good point when they say that their employers make profits and should share those profits with those that do the work. Government does not earn any profits. The only place the public sector unions have to get money is out of the tax payers pockets.
Jeff's suggestions for public sector unions:
1) implement programs for training your members and insuring that substandard workers are not certified as union members.
2) agree in you collective bargaining that you don't get paid while your on strike. As a corollary, public officals should be subject to a recall vote if the unions go out. Both sides will then have some encouragment to settle it quickly. For the record I think the WI law may will be a violation of the 1st amendment right to peaceablly assemble and petition the government for redress of greivences. Note that the government doesn't have to do anything (or even listen to) the complaint, but they can't stop you from voicing it.
3) the public unions need to recognize that in a tough economy everybody is going to have to give a little. Having to pay for part of your health plan may be the price of keeping a job.
4) the public sector unions need to do a better job of convincing the public that we are getting something for our money (see #1 above).
I think all of this would go a long way to keeping the peace on this matter.
FYI and a side note; I'm now a 99er. I would happily pay half my health insurance cost if somebody would give me a job.