It reminds me of a little kid who when asked a question answers "Because" and then when asked "Because why?" answers back with "Because".
Precisely, and perhaps the most frustrating element when trying to have a rational conversation with a religionist. Belief based on faith inevitably must
rely on subjective, experiential 'feelings' rather than demonstrable, tangible facts or any reasonable evidence. This is why I long ago gave up discussing religion or god with my JW parents.
When we get to the end of the conversation where I have used logic and reason to argue against these silly supernatural forces, their scripted, final comeback is
invariably "who are YOU to question the mind of god?" LOL......followed by them leaving in a huff to go off and lick their wounds. By the logic and proof of principle
demanded of the "believer" , anything I perceive (pink elephants, little green men, tooth fairies, peter the rabbit, the giant pumpkin) cannot be disputed logically because I
have 'faith' that I did indeed 'experience' said events and/or perceptions.