Here's a JIOR related issue you might want to check out. Sort of what I'm up to when not posting..
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/11/140387/1.ashx
OJ Simpson is JIOR.
But I think my personal experiences contributed to my open mindedness about what we hear in the press and what the reality it. It involves my first-ever arrest. It was in L.A. I was an entertainer at the time and had money, plus a boyfriend. He was German-Italian. I had entered a drag contest. I was sponsored by some bar who liked me. Anyway, it was election year and when it was the LAPD would go on these raids and just arrest lots of gay people. Now granted, some of them likely were guilty and were just being entrapped, but I wasn't one of them. Basically I was just walking out of the facility with my trophy (I think I won 3rd place or something) and an officer said I was under arrest. I handed my trophy to my lover, who was petrified but also didn't want to get involved. He was straight and married otherwise, with a job, etc. I guess they thought it would be fun to get some of the more prominent gays. Another well-known black entertainer who was there was also arrested. I felt so much like Billie Holiday. But I wasn't that worried at first because I had worked for the Sheriff's Department before and I knew they had to generate a report and make charges. I didn't do anything, so what could they say? I was charged with prostitution. No way!
The gay community was outraged. They came to their defense of this group who were called "The Innocent Nine". But while this was going on I was able to obtain a copy of the police report. And there it was. Two officers claiming they witnessed me propositioning another officer. It was just a lie. An amazing lie. Earlier while being arrested and booked I looked at the officer who was arresting me. A young, nice looking black officer. I could see his guilt, because he knew I was innocent. So I learned something very important that day. I realized that if the organization is corrupt, then that corruption trickles down to everyone. I felt sorry for the officer because I could see he was just going along. It was a lesson into how corruption works. When I read the false report, though, I learned another valuable lesson. That is, that a person's rights is only as good as the arresting officer wants them to be. The police have great power. And if two lie about you, then what can you do? Nothing. NOTHING!
So I reflected back on all those stories of blacks claiming they weren't doing anything or they got beat up by the police. Stories I just shined on with the usual dismissal, presuming they must have been doing something for the officers to act that way. Now I knew for sure the reality. If there's a political motive, details about truth and your civil rights go right out the window. Before the Rodney King beating video came out, I bet if he told his story nobody would believe him. Yet the world was totally SHOCKED at what they saw. But the average black person in L.A. wasn't shocked. They know that goes on all the time. It's just no one was paying attention until it got caught on tape.
In fact, it was almost a given, particularly in the Firestone Station Area where I worked and that was close to Watts, that there was a problem with "street justice." That is, a known drug dealer, probably with money to buy a lawyer and make bail, would be executed in the field before he ever went to court. It's easily done. They just have to provoke a fight or plant a weapon on the person. Don't believe me? Those officers aren't going to get killed out there and they are tired of these criminals getting away with crimes. So some of the officers just carry an extra unmarked weapon with them in case they decide, even in self defense, to kill someone. The weapon is planted on them and the paperwork taken care of. How many cases have we heard of where the offiicers break in and start shooting and end up killing the wrong person? That's what L.A. is about. A racist but sometimes sympathetic war going on between the police and the ciminal element, and those who get caught up in the middle.
But this affects the OJ Simpson case. Why? Because I know first hand that it's nothing for LAPD officers to lie and create a case if there is a political or moral incentive to do so. It is as simple as paperwork. But it's profound once it happens to you. It's one of those things that we don't want to believe or refuse to believe unless its forced on us like a video. Then suddenly we're SHOCKED!
It made a big difference in my sense of what the world was really like and how close I came to maybe going to jail and the whole thing. In fact, I sort of got off on how much I looked like a woman. Not sure if I should admit this. But I used to HOPE an officer would pull me over. I don't know how I got them to pull me over. I think I just acted "suspicious." But they did. And of course, you know how cute officers usually are, all dressed up and neat and clean and everything. It was just thrilling for me for them to stop me. I was this semi-pretty young woman. Then I'd give them my license and it was my male ID! (I did get female ID at one point!) They were always amazed! I never got a ticket! Sometimes they would just stop me and ask if I was all right. You know, a young woman alone and all. But that changed after the arrest and betrayal by the police. Then whenever I saw police car I litterally shuddered inside. I didn't want to play cute "surprise, I'm really a guy!" with the police any more. I was afraid of them now because I wasn't safe. The system didn't protect me.
So you see, knowing from first hand, I have absolutely no problem looking for evidence of the officers involved being corrupt. It doesn't mean they were even in on the murders, just that they could lose certain evidence or look the other way. A whole lot depends on the integrity of the officers. They were not interested in establishing any reasonable doubts in the OJ case, though they pretended they were just going by the book. Oh yeah, like OJ Simpson's blood sample being carried to the crime scene? WHAT?!!!
Plus another JOKE of the case, where they actually videotaped OJ's bedroom and there were no socks on the floor. Then they videotaped it again and there were. Turns out the socks had blood on them. They tested the blood and I think it was Nicoles. But then the dense pointed out that blood was also on two sides of the sock. Thus whoever planted the blood had to have applied it while the sock was off the foot. How DUMB can you get? They didn't think about that. So I guess, without being able to get the murder weapon and blood clothes back to Rockingham in time, they knew they needed something to prove OJ could have committed the crimes and gotten back in time to go to Chicago, and Nichole's blood on his sock was a desperate attempt to make the timeline convincing.
So the OJ Simpson case is like anything else. People see what they want to see or only listen to what the Illuminati-controlled media puts out. But once you look deeper and learn more details, then the case falls apart for the prosecution and you see evidence of fabricated evidence. Even so, it was a very effective frame-up because the average person, I think, believes this man actually did it.
Another reason I know OJ didn't do it because I know black people and I know his type. He's EDUCATED. I worked with lots of black doctors and other professionals. One of OJ's charities was for black students going to UCLA for them to buy some fashionable clothes. This is a man who is aware of what it's like to be black and in a world of so many other rich people and how that makes you feel not to fit in. So he was addressing the psychological experience associated with being black at a major university, trying to compete with the other students, who had all the social advantages but also looked down on people who were not dressed well. Now that's where he is coming from? Why would someone like that lose it and kill the mother of his children? Now if he's smart enough to be concerned about something like this, he certainly wouldn't have been so dumb to think he could kill his wife and get away with it. Plus why didn't he use a gun with a silencer? Why a KNIFE? The reason why is because the public is bamboozled by BLOOD EVIDENCE! Blood evidence can eliminate suspects! That's a key to this. To get the most out of blood evidence, you need someone bleeding profusely and lots of blood. I mean, think about it. If he had wanted to kill her, it made since to just shoot her right quick with a silencer and then get back to his normal life, right? "You B(*(*&! " POW. But how would any blood get back to Rockingham that way? It wouldln't! How would OJ's blood get left at the crime scene to convince the gullible world that he was actually there and did this? It wouldn't! So even the manner of murder, which is not at all typical for a murder weapon in LA, particularly among blacks, is suspicious. Why a knife and slit throats? It makes sense, though, if you are setting out to frame someone with an abundance of blood evidence. There has to be a scenario where the blood is flowing and would get onto clothing and other things. But it worked. People ignore the slightly illogical use of a knife to kill these two people and focus on the result of the blood evidence, which effectively eliminates all other suspects than OJ, even though the blood evidence was all quite plantable. And if you have first-hand knowledge that LAPD is a corrupt agency, one that corrupts from the top down, then you know you cannot exclude corrupt officers involved, even though that would be something the average person would presume. That the black criminal is guilty and the white officers are truthful and honest and respectable. Not so after the Rodney King beatings. Officers are just as thuggy as the drive-by killing gang bangers in L.A. Some of them anyway.
It's too different worlds. The fake world the media makes us think we're living in, and the world manipulated behind the scenes by people with power and money who control practically everything we read, hear on the news or see on TV. If the incentive is great enough, they can kill presidents or prominent figures and get away with it, like JFK, RFK and MLK.
That makes you wonder why they haven't killed Ben Ladin yet, right? But he's necessary to create a public threat to keep the war on terrorism going strong, isn't he? So it's not really in the best interest of the war industry that he be found and killed, right? And now all of a sudden the Al Qaeda is threatening the United States? Give me a break! Yes, the threat is real, because of atomic bombs and chemical warfare, but who invented those things, and who are actually paying for it? FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Anyway, as we approach Armageddon we are supposed to be alert, so those expecting Armageddon and the destruction of the Illuminati by the UN are watching, and the OJ Simpson case is a side issue we are also watching. It will interesting to see how all this comes to a head.
JC
