Okay, I didn't really want to step into the muck of this thread (yeah, right!) considering the All-American, Red, White, and Blue viewpoint espoused by the initial post, but my bud, Master DannyB called me out, so...
You must be a masochist.
Why... whatever do you mean?!!! I've heard that statement pointed in my direction before and I want you to know that I resemble... er, resent that remark. I was being quite sincere, I'll have you know. I was deeply moved, feeling the love dripping from Julie's admission for a once-upon-a-time board adversary.
If I may break into another love-fest that's currently breaking out, I'd like to comment on something you said, Seeker.
You said: Watts and Thomas are very much considered uncle toms. It's not just their stand that makes them such, but the reasoning they use to reach that stand that makes them unpopular.
Like a lot of your views, the first part of the above statement I can't disagree with. Many in the black community do indeed consider them that way, fairly or otherwise.
It's the second part that I wanted to comment on. Perhaps you should amend your comment to say that they are unpopular "with some," or something like that. There is no question that both Watts and Thomas are extremely popular with many people, just not a high percentage (majority?) of black people.
Personally, I find Thomas to be way easier to take than Watts. I've seen a couple of Sir Thomas' speeches on C-Span and find that I more often agree with his viewpoints than disagree. Sometimes he can be downright inspirational. His being called an Uncle Tom has not always been fair, being the occasional dissenting voice in the black, politically correct collective in Washington.
Watts is, on the other hand, very greasy. Don't care much for him.
later,
tj