MadApostate said:
: RFWorshippers will even humble themselves to glorifying a post of someone they dislike if it may possibly be a positive for their "god".
I think that this perfectly illustrates the mindlessness of knee-jerk reactions.
A rational person will acknowledge rational arguments no matter their source. An irrational person will not. In fact, one of the marks of irrationality is discounting arguments only because of their source.
Clearly, Julie rational and MA is not.
Jehovah's Witnesses are highly trained to accept arguments based on source alone. Thus they accept nonsense from the Governing Body simply because they virtually worship the GB. The content of Watchtower articles, no matter how stupid, is accepted without question. Similarly, all information critical of JWs is rejected without consideration and without thought.
It's clear that MA is still a JW -- if not in fact, then emotionally.
I will now sit back and watch the foaming at the mouth we've come to expect.
AlanF