tammy -- so the dads action would be moral if the boy did not suffer something he was dying of, but rather dying as a natural consequence from? Okay i will try:
Example: a kid sneaking out of his house, falling off the roof and breaking his leg. His father has a miracle drug that he give him every day so he will live forever, but he reason: "He didnt do as i instructed him, why should i give him the drugs? I told him i wouldnt if he broke my instruction! If i just continued to give him the drugs, is that going to stop them from sneaking out of the house again in the future? Or are they just going to find a different way of sneaking out (instead of just waiting until they are old enough and wise enough to actually leave that house at night through the front door)?". So the dad make the kid move out of his house and he eventually dies.
mmmm.