I expect we can all agree that there are some reasonable, well-meaning elders out there. This is in spite of the WTBTS's medieval policies, certainly not because of it.
However, most elders are pretty much "Company Men" when it comes to judicial matters. If they don't start out that way, they become that way or they quit, resign, get removed or whatever. That's just the way it is.
The implied concern with WBF's original post is the fear that the elders are looking for something for which he could be disfellowshipped, specifically in this case "apostasy" as defined by the WTBTS.
He confirms this in his follow-up comments when he acknowledges expressing dissenting points of view to his wife. He stated, "if they [the elders] question my wife and kids they will know that I no longer view the JW's as God's Organization." He also added, "She most definately is not on my side in this matter." and said that as far as she is concerned what he is "doing to the family is reprehensible". This is a real problem, or at least has the potential to become one.
curiouscynic, maybe you haven't been keeping up with the latest WT rhetoric, but it's become pretty volatile and hostile towards any dissension or criticism of the Governing Body. If someone is in a congregation with anything less than sympathetic elders, they have much to fear. This is particularly true if the family is not on the same page regarding how they currently view the organization and its teachings.
I'm getting the feeling CC that you haven't really read through the complete thread before weighing in with your comments.
In light of the fact that WBF's wife is not on board with him and the fact that the Society is taking an increasingly hard line with dissenters he has good reason to be concerned for his family.