by AGuest 452 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
There are no 'churches'. Christ leads the Church (all those who belong to Him - the Body of Christ)
I don't understand. There are many churches. Are you saying those aren't really churches being led by Christ? Then where do they come from (those that claim to be a church) who leads them?
Don't be silly. Of course, no.
Wrong.
EE, way out of line, bro. Cut that out, please.
Now that EE has been dealt with, regardless of what myelaine said, that was no call for Aguest's comments. Where is your rebuke?
Then, as possibly one of the biggest hypocrites on this board... and certainly within the WTBTS... you of all people should probably remain silent on these matters.
Shelby, you cut it out too. You have zero room on this issue, either.
Facious is what i do inkie. Your not new here, im sire you have seen my posts before
I can see why you view it this way, Loz. But think about it. Myelaine had just been corrected by Ang. That was pretty much the final word, and I certainly did not post any disagreement to it. Should I have piled on to a point that had been clearly made, actually dramatically made? It should have been the last word. But then Aguest came and posted some very mean things about Myelaine after Ang had spoken. Personally I would have let it sit, since the final authority had already handled it, but that is not everybody.
So here is how I looked at it. Try to see it from my eyes for a moment. I felt that Myelaine had already been pretty firmly put in place over some remarks. It was done.
Ok I hear what you're saying and will attempt to take you at your word. It's very difficult to do when this scenario is so often repeated here, and there is a definite, obvious, blatant bias against AGuest. It's undeniable now, and when some pretend it isnt happening its ridiculous. But whatever. I wanted to reply to Myaleine but didn't because Angharad spoke for us, so I didn't feel there was a need. The fact that AGuest did, was up to her, and I agree that she shouldn't be expected to keep a higher standard, she's human and insults offend, just as Outlaw said. If you'd left it there it may or may not have been brought to a conclusion between the two of them. By rushing in to tackle AGuest you took a side, in effect, when it really wasnt needed. It detracted from Angharad's points too. Then the rest joined in. Unnecessary in my view, but sadly I repeat, totally predictable.
Loz x
Why is Shelby being held to a higher standard than the rest of the people on the planet?..
She's not, Outlaw, but she has said untrue things on the forum many times, been corrected and kept repeating them. The first time is an error or ignorance, the rest are lies. I couldn't care less about the visions she gets.
Now, everyone, calm the fark down.
Ok I hear what you're saying and will attempt to take you at your word
That's all I can ask. I'd like to say, I did not tackle anybody. I really didn't. I was quite mild and just stated my mind. I didn't get personal. I just said what from my viewpoint was correct to say. But I suppose you attempting to take me at my word is progress.
May I suggest that you are also biased? When I made a very mild comment, that included no personal attack at all, you called it tackling. It wasn't a tackle. I know how to tackle. I kept it pretty clean. It is uncomfortable for me to know that if I ever disagree with Aguest, I will get accused of many things I did not do. It's disturbing, but I'll deal with it.
The fact that (EE) did, was up to (him), and I agree that (he) shouldn't be expected to keep a higher standard, (he's) human and insults offend, just as Outlaw said. If you'd left it there it may or may not have been brought to a conclusion between the two of them. By rushing in to tackle (ee) you took a side, in effect, when it really wasnt needed. It detracted from Angharad's points too. Then the rest joined in. Unnecessary in my view, but sadly I repeat, totally predictable.
Does that srill ring true for you loz, or only when it suits you?
{{{{{ However since the owners of the board seem intent on supporting your tirades and trying muzzel anyone who attempts to question your bitchy nature.}}}}}
Utter bullshit - we have taken action on BOTH sides of this debate, you just choose to read what suits you and you have NO idea what happens behind the scenes
Personal attacks on both sides are not acceptable. Shelby lost her temper and did say something that was insulting but you seem intent to ignore what prompted it.
{{{{{ou shouldnt even expect a response to a PM. You'll just be banned with a smart ass remark or something and everyone else will simply know crossing some people isnt allowed. All animals are created equal, just some more equal than others. And the bigger and more rediclous your visions and the longer and more pointless your posts, the more "equal" you are evidently .}}}}}}}
You seem to be going out of your way to make trouble and be insulting, it sounds like you would like to get yourself banned to prove your rediculous point.
