Fallacies about Faith

by tec 340 Replies latest jw friends

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    You imply that people don't have to repent and turn to God for forgiveness of sins and salvation as long as they are good and nice to Christs brothers.

    for instance would you ever say to OUTLAW or Adamah or anyone, " you must turn to Jesus Christ for forgiveness

    of you sins and salvation or you will be lost and die in you sins?".....MyElaine

    I`m an Agnostic,Non Believer,with No Faith..

    My observation is..

    That statement successfully seperates Peaceful Christians with Faith,who follow Jesus..

    From Thugs who pose as Christians and smile,as they threaten you with their Beliefs..

    ...................................

    Extortion

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia..

    Extortion (also called shakedown, outwresting, and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from a person, entity, or institution, through coercion. Refraining from doing harm is sometimes euphemistically called protection. Extortion is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to commit the offense. Making a threat of violence which refers to a requirement of a payment of money or property to halt future violence is sufficient to commit the offense. Exaction refers not only to extortion or the unlawful demanding and obtaining of something through force, [ 1 ] but additionally, in its formal definition, means the infliction of something such as pain and suffering or making somebody endure something unpleasant. [ 2 ]

    Extortion is distinguished from robbery. In robbery, whether armed or not, the offender takes property from the victim by the immediate use of force or fear that force will be immediately used (as in the classic line, "Your money or your life.") Extortion, which is not limited to the taking of property, involves the verbal or written instillation of fear that something will happen to the victim if he or she does not comply with the extortionist's will. Another key distinction is that extortion always involves a verbal or written threat, whereas robbery does not. In United States federal law, extortion can be committed with or without the use of force and with or without the use of a weapon.

    ............................................................................

    .

    ....................................  photo mutley-ani1.gif...OUTLAW

  • mrhhome
    mrhhome

    I have not read all 6 pages of posts, but this thread has been remarkably polite. This post will probably change that.

    Faith = good and moral. Lack of faith = bad and immoral

    I would not use the words good people and bad people. Those words are entirely too broad and carry the baggage of unintended connotations. However, there are real meaningful differences in how believers and non-believers behave. That does not imply that believers are somehow superior to the non-believers. Nor does it imply that believers are perfect people who never make mistakes and are above criticism. Obviously, it does mean that I believe that I am right and they are wrong. If the topic is mores, it means that my actions are moral and theirs are immoral.

    If there are no “fruits of the spirit,” then how can any Christian claim that we believe in anything real? Fortunately, you do not have to be a rocket scientist to review the postings on this board and conclude that believers and non-believers generally differ on important moral questions.

    Having said that, there are many Christians who do not demonstrate the fruits of the spirit. Ironically, that is my litmus test for JW. I do not care where they stand on doctrinal issues. If I do not see the fruits of the spirit, I do not consider them Christians no matter how much they thump the Bible. Likewise, I left the Southern Baptist when I went to college, because I felt that they missed the forest for the trees.

  • mrhhome
    mrhhome

    Anti-semitic racism. - Cofty

    For once, I have to agree with Cofty. There is some blantant anti-semitism in the Bible.

    Having said that, one has to consider the historical background. You had "Jewish Christianity" probably centered around the original disciples and led by "James the Just." At the same time, you had a rapidly growing "Gentile Christianity" created by the apostle Paul. The "Jewish Christians" probably were wiped out in the Jewish revolt against Rome in 66-70 AD for all practical purposes. I hold to the view that they were somehow involved in the revolt. This is about the same time that Nero was persecuting the Christians. The Gentile Christians were doing everything they could do to put as much distance between themselves and the "Jewish Christians."

    I would not expect the "Gentile Christians" to say anything nice about the "Jewish Christians". The Gentile Christians were busy trying to save their own hide.

  • mrhhome
    mrhhome

    Correction to my previous post:

    I would not expect the "Gentile Christians" to say anything nice about the Jews who revolted against Rome. The Gentile Christians were busy trying to save their own hides.

  • cofty
    cofty

    If the topic is mores, it means that my actions are moral and theirs are immoral. - mrhhome

    Did you really just say that unbelievers are immoral?

  • adamah
    adamah

    michelle said- I don't have a fairy-tale view of OT God...far from it.

    Ahhh, so you are aware of the brutality of YHWH, but I suppose Xians realized they cannot win many converts to Xianity by telling people, "Look, there's this powerful being who you REALLY don't want to piss off, so you'd better just play along and do as he says, or we're ALL going to be toast..." Instead, you've got to sell the message of the love of Jesus and joy of knowing that YOU are going to be saved, and thus are on the willing team. Screw the rest of humanity, since it's "survival of the fittest" (which ironically is NOT part of evolution: that's a common myth, often perpetuated by those who don't know jack about evolution).

    Holy Hades, michelle: even if there were a shred of evidence for YHWH existing (and there is not), you really need to learn about Stolkholm Syndrome, a not-uncommon (per FBI, it develops in 27% of hostage-taking situations) psychological phenomemon where hostages perversely side with their kidnappers, perhaps out of a sense of avoidance of the horror they are experiencing; it's as if they cannot fathom that others would be so callous as to kill them, and they project their emotional reaction onto their kidnappers, in a form of traumatic bonding.

    From the wikipedia:

    One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual’s response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be a threat. [5] Battered-person syndrome is an example of activating the capture–bonding psychological mechanism, as are military basic training and fraternity bonding by hazing.

    You've bought into the contradictory values of the aggressor God, who claims to be a "God of Love", yet orders the genocide of non-Hebrew Gentiles. You cannot resolve the discrepancy, but are simply too afraid to do anything about it.

    michelle said- Based on the OT accounts of God I actually fear the LORD and that's WHY I'm thankful that Jesus took my punishment...

    I don't think you realize just how ridiculous Xian theology sounds to modern people who don't understand the Hebraic history behind the development of such a policy. Unlike modern people, Hebrews accepted the idea of not only inherited familal wealth, but of inherited debts. Modern societies got rid of that concept, millenia ago.

    They also used the practice of go'el, 'blood redemption', wherein the family had the duty to seek the killer of their kinsman in order to act as an agent of Jehovah. There was a limited concept of law enforcement: it was up to the family to seek justice, and vigilante law was allowed (but tightly regulation) in order to redeem their kin's spilled blood (which in Genesis, Abel's blood cried out to YHWH demanding vengeance).

    The way it worked was that ALL killers, guilty of manslaughter (accidental) or murder (intentional), had to flee to the nearest 'city of refuge', and the victim's family member had to be appointed and chase after them in hot pursuit, allowed to avenge their death if they should catch the person on the way. If the accused person arrived, the city elders had a hearing; if the person was ruled guilty of murder, they were handed over to the waiting go'el to carry out their execution; if found innocent of murder but guilty of manslaughter, they were permitted to stay in the city as their "safe zone" (and the go'el was permitted to kill them without bloodguilt if he found the person outside of the city walls).

    The person had to stay within the city of refuge UNTIL the death of the high priest, when he was allowed to return to his home city; the idea was that only the death of a holy person can atone for the sins of others: that's why Jesus was referred to as a 'high priest', and the redeemer.

    Xianity has taken a Jewish concept and twisted it all about, since per Xian doctrine, Jesus' death was supposed to atone for the sin of the perfect man, repaying a debt owed to God. But wait: Isaiah often spoke of Jehovah as "the Divine go-el' who would redeem His chosen people when they were held captive in Babylon; how can God be BOTH the debtor and the payor of debts?

    Think about it: God is supposedly assuming mortal form as Jesus in order to pay himself back a debt which he owned himself, due to Adam's sin (where Jewish doctrines hold that only the sinner can seek atonement for, after expressing repentence). Xian theology is busy-work, creating a problem for mankind that fortunately the Bible also offers a solution. It's worse than those infomercials that have to spend time inventing a problem only to offer you a solution to it (eg those rubber dimpled balls used in the laundry to prevent static cling, replace fabric softener, etc).

    Anyone who truly understood Jewish thinking on the role of sacrifices and atonement of sins would see Xianity is a doctrinal hodge-podge, a logical mess of piece-meal "stuff"....

    michelle said- When He ordered entire nations killed I can be sure that He is absolutely serious when He says that He is against sin and those who practice it and that He has every intention of routing it out regardless of how horrendous others might think HE is.

    Yes, but do you have the moral courage to stand up and declare that God's genocidal campaign and endorsement of slavery is WRONG?

    (I highly-doubt you do, as you still seem trapped in your fears; that partly explains why you ended up in the JWs, in the first-place.)

    michelle said- the NT scripture says it is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God...I have no reason to doubt that.

    Well there's your problem, then: that's proof-positive of contagious toxic thinking on display.

    A more skeptical approach is NOT to assume ANYTHING is true, but to wait until AFTER you have seen evidence on which to base the belief: that goes for fairies, UFOs, ghosts, Gods, etc. Give up the addiction to magical thinking, as there's much-more actual mystery in the World with REAL unknowns, without needing to resort to figments of the imagination, etc.

    Do yourself a favor and strike those words from your vocabulary ("I have no reason to doubt that"), since you really should have a REASON to believe things in the form of evidence; anything else is a recipe for stress-filled life and being a victim of others, too fearful of the unknown boogy-men out there.

    Adam

  • DJS
    DJS

    Mrhhome,

    WTF????? Once again a theist has spewed nonsense absent any facts. Below is data that I have posted 2 times previously, but you and other theists ignore it and similar data and simply spew idioacy. If by morals you mean your specific brand of right and wrong then all the atheists on this board will tell you to stuff it. I just did. Try thinking before you type. Cofty is much kinder than I.

    there are real meaningful differences in how believers and non-believers behave.

    Yes, I agree. the godless are much better people; much more moral. Really, I don't know why I bother.

    The godless commit less crime, have longer marriages and are more highly educated than almost any other group in America.

    According to Federal Bureau of Prisons data, the number of responding people in prison acknowledging they were Catholic was 39 percent; Protestant, 35 percent; Muslim, 7 percent; Jewish, 2 percent; and godless, 0.2 percent (20 percent did not respond).

    Since the number of godless is estimated to be 10 percent of the general population, all things being equal you would expect their prison population to be 10 percent.

    If, as many people assume, the godless do not lead moral lives, you would expect the number to be greater than 10 percent. The fact that the actual number is 50 times less than expected can lead to only one of two conclusions: either the godless commit less crime than the religious or they’re too smart to get caught very often.

    According to a Barna Research Group report, fundamentalist Christians have the highest divorce rate, followed by Jews and Baptists. The godless are tied with Catholics and Lutherans for the lowest divorce rate. It seems that some groups that claim to follow the Bible most strictly are not putting their money where their mouths are. The godless who are thought to be without morals seem to take their vows more seriously.

    According to a Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life Survey, the least-educated Americans are Jehovah’s Witnesses, followed by black Protestants and fundamentalist Christians. The most highly educated are reformed Jews, followed by Unitarian Universalists and the godless.

    Some groups seem to like their flocks ignorant so that pastors’ interpretations of God’s edicts are not questioned. Other groups prize scholarship and achieve more in their lives here on Earth.

    In fact, a review of worldwide studies found that criminality and religion go hand in hand. The countries with the most religious people have the highest crime rates, highest sexually transmitted diseases and the highest teen pregnancy rates.

    This is also true in the United States. The more religious a state’s population, the higher the crime, STD and teen pregnancy rates. The report does say that the religious are happier than the secular but posits that the ostracism of the latter may be a major cause.

    So what conclusion can be reached? It is obvious that you do not have to believe in a higher power in order to live a moral and successful life. Quite the opposite.

    I won’t attempt to claim a correlation of religion with crime, infidelity and ignorance. However, it is total hypocrisy for those in such groups to claim that the godless are not and cannot be moral. Yet in a recent study atheists were believed to be no more trustworthy than rapists.

    In spite of this easily obtained information, the groups with the highest crime rate, the poorest marriages and the lowest education continually strive to force their beliefs on the nonreligious. And the politicians pander to them. Why else would they pass laws to put religion in the schools and on courthouse facades? And then they wonder why the godless could possibly be upset.

  • tec
    tec

    I believe Christians, because of our history, must go the extra mile in making sure we don't make antisemitic references.

    Referring to the hard-heartedness of ISRAEL (you guys keeping speaking of Jews as being Israel; the Jews are only two portions of the twelve tribes) is not anti-semitic. Once again, Israel's OWN prophets stated so, from God. As did Christ, who was born Jewish... and all of his apostles, most loved, were Jewish.

    Of course, it still isn't clear what you believe, either to a progressive Christian, such as myelf, or a more conservative one, such as Elaine.

    I believe those antisemitic references in the Bible are unfortunate. In my church, we don't quote them. Jews are not blamed for Christ's death. You may think it is no big deal but it is a big deal. The concentration camps are evidence of Christianity gone wild.

    Yeah... the 'christianity' gone wild... was more evidence of a lack of Christ, rather than a presence of Christ. Because hate, prejudice, violence, murder, etc... these are not fruits of the spirit. In these cases, i would suggest that the 'christians' were blind and deaf and hard-hearted... and certainly did not reflect Christ.

    He WEPT over Israel; He went FIRST to Israel; He forgave Israel and asked God to forgive Israel. It is gentiles who are grafted INTO Israel... so that the two become one.

    God is the Most Holy One of ISRAEL. His Son is the Holy One of ISRAEL. It is the new JERUSALEM that comes down out of heaven.

    So you believe that Christ talks to you.

    He is alive. He speaks. Not to me alone, but to anyone.

    Rather than write about fallacies atheists have, I suggest it woudl have been more instructive to outline what your faith believes are.

    There are plenty of threads and posts of those, but that might have been more instructive. I think though, had i made this thread about my faith, that this thread would have dissolved more quickly and perhaps even been locked by now.

    My faith is Christ centered.

    Okay. What does that mean, if you do not mind my asking?

    There is no so much talk about the Father.

    Okay. I talk about both the Son and the Father.

    You don't believe in the Trinity, do you?

    Correct.

    I have no reason at all to do so other than to follow the traditions of men.

    Do you believe Christ is the Incarnated?

    The incarnated what? The Word made flesh, yes.

    Is Christ the same as God?

    No.

    Christ - the Son

    God - the Father

    Is the Holy Spirit a separate person or aspect of God or an impersonal force used by God?

    THE Holy Spirit is a person... but that person IS Christ. Christ is the Spirit. He is referred to as the Spirit by Paul on numerous occasions. He is also the Truth. Can the Spirit of Truth then, be an entirely different person? What is this third person's name? Christ and God each have their own name.

    "holy spirit" - is the life that comes from God, through Christ, to us. "holy spirit" is what one is annointed with; it is what Christ breathed upon the apostles at Pentecost.

    We have the example of Pharoah/Joseph and the grain needed for life during the famine:

    In that example,

    Pharoah represents God

    Joseph represents Christ

    the grain represents the water of life/holy spirit

    The grain belonged to Pharoah... Pharoah gave all authority to Joseph... who distributed the grain on Pharoah's behalf.

    It would be interesting to go down the list of JW dogma and see where the variances are. When I visited your forum many months ago I found much of the content was from the OT. It reminded me of the WT teachings. I do believe their life goal is to be ancient Israelites.

    Hard for me to comment on that. There is content from all manner of things, OT, NT, the Spirit, on science, on world events, etc...

    I am also curious as to what Christ speaking to has has instructed you. If he is speaking to you, I assume there is a special message.

    Why would He not simply speak and teach truth? Just as he did with his disciples and apostles, before and after He returned to His Father?

    To say, as the Spirit (Christ) and Bride say, and as the one who hears also says, "Come... all you who are thirsting and all you who are seeking... and take the gift of the water of life... FREE!"

    Which water is holy spirit poured out from the Most Holy One of Israel, through His Son, Jaheshua, the Spirit and chosen one of Jah.

    Peace to you,

    tammy

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    To learn truth, I can pick up a science textbook. Wouldn't it be closer to say, "speak wisdom"?

  • Band on the Run
    Band on the Run

    Tammy,

    It sounds as though you are a Witness who does not want control from a central authority. Merely claiming that Christ speaks to you is not much distinction.IMO. I believe in a very different Christ. If one is goiing to be Christian, I say embrace Christ. Follow what the early Chritians did. Adopting a Witness understanding makes no sense. One might as well be a Witness.

    DJS,

    Your post is compelling. It seems that education is a powerful variable. I often wonder if those with education are not more disciplined. It seems as tho the fundamentalist and conservative churches preach one thing and do another. The statistics on divorce are amazing. It is not what I expected. Of course, I've lived primarily in one area. New York City is viewed as sin central by the religious right. Yet I saw no signs of loose morals in middle and upper middle class New York. Now the streets and shelters are another story. It could very well be economic. As education increases, income increases. People feel more able to positively impact their lives.

    So how do all these churches broadcast the message that their followers are so saintly? When I traveled to West Virginia for medical treatment, I stayed in a Bible belt. The locals told me the addiction rates soared. Yet everyone praised God all the time. It might me do as I say rather than as I do.

    Obviously, there are complex variables. I had no idea. Thanks for your post.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit