something to think about ....
How much time do you suppose a non-celebrity / person would have to serve for statutory rape involving the use of drugs ?
by Simon 102 Replies latest social current
something to think about ....
How much time do you suppose a non-celebrity / person would have to serve for statutory rape involving the use of drugs ?
Murder is a bit more involving don't you think ?
He's guilty and he knows it, so do many others. Its only matter of time before the real shit hits the fan. He's dam lucky he's rich and can afford the best legal defense in the country, like OJ. Something tells me he's going to need it.
In 2005 he testified in a lawsuit brought by a Temple University employee that he gave her 3 half pints of benadryl and that he also got qualudes with the intent of giving them to young women he wanted to have sex with.
I think the "did he?", "didn't he?" is over. He testified in court that he does this. It's no longer he said/she said. HE said it happened.
Now there could be a woman or two riding the bandwagon to get money. It's possible. But that doesn't excuse him for what he testified to.
👆👆Yup!
Murder is pushing it but he completely admitted to drugging....it's over for him.
" Oh how the mighty fall " when we put them on a pedestal and they don`t live up to it ,whether it be a politician , a celebrity , movie or sports person , or , heaven forbid , an Elder or Governing Body member.
Bill cosby was one of our fav .shows to watch , as was Rolf Harris , as it turns out they are not good role models ,and because of their high profile in society , in my book they should feel the greatest severity of the law , especially when they deny it for so long,
That compounds the abuse made against the victims.
I wonder if, or when, such an accusation will surface against a G.B. member ,? you never know.
smiddy
What is so disturbing is that it looks like he did this repetitively, without hesitation or little remorse, while being married no less.
One can expect there will be some civil law suits to occur now with this new and very damaging information.
it's a pity there is a statute of limitation on these cases. I understand and appreciate the reason for having such things but I think there are certain cases where a case can be made that there are reasons why someone couldn't come forward - when dealing with the powerful and celebrity for instance.
There should be a system where someone can argue the reason and have the statute lifted in exceptional cases such as this one.
Everyone knows he's guilty. If I see his wife grinning on TV like the cheshire cat again I'm going to punch my screen in.
These people should be left with nothing. Nothing at all but shame.
At least the big corporations are doing the right thing and dropping any association with him.
Ditto Simon. In one of my earlier posts on this OP I indicated that he would be ultimately abandoned by the entertainment industry. Another despicable aspect of the Cos' 40 year rape spree is that he used his fame and feigning mentoring attractive young women to lure them into position. The man is despicable on many levels.
Isn't it ironic, don't you think?