Well, I think what I paraphrased form memory of just one email from several weeks ago:
I did not complain and threaten to take silentlambs links off my website but was pointing out that I thought it was better if we could resolve things sensibly instead of things escalating and becoming silly.
... was pretty accurate:
I would prefer to get this matter sorted out properly as I would hate to have to start replying to her from my site (which I will do if I have to) or getting really petty and removing links to silentlambs. However, I'm starting to get really angry about what she has been doing and will do whatever I need to because it really is getting beyond a joke.
If you want to read things a different way (and try and make everyone else read it that way with bold and red highlighting) then that is up to you. I was merely pointing out how strongly I felt about this issue.
That silentlambs was a whole new game, and that the board was dedicated to the victims, and we don't need this negativity. That comment was before you started ranting and raving, but still I did not edit your post
Please tell me where I started ranting and raving?! My comment on the forum was very simple and clearly stated the reasons (answering dunbeetles post to me) and that I did not think that the SL forum wanted to start off with stuff like that and that it should be handled by email. If this is ranting and raving then you need serious help matey!
It's funny to note that when you need help on silentlambs, you wish to resolve it via email, and you get exactly what you want.
Again, I suggested email because I did not think you wanted stuff like that on your forum. I was trying to help.
I could have gone on your post and asked you to take it elsewhere, or hammered you in some other way, but I did not. I spoke with you in private, and we handled it with no problems, and you even got what you asked for.
No, you couldn't, because I didn't post anything that was unreasonable. You know it would have made you look incredibly biased. I approached you with the problem. It seems someone had edited the post I made and no one knew who.
When it comes to me, you couldn't just leave it alone and delete my membership could you? You had to try and embarrass me, and make me look like the fool. Well, I may look like a fool, and I may look like I haven't a clue what I'm talking about, and I may look to others (thanks to you), that I am this name calling abusive person without being provoked,
I didn't do that. You chose to keep posting.
... but at least I don't look like a liar. Liars deserve no respect. They're worse than people like Farkel and Lonewolf. I have to give at least Farkel some credit. On the thread where you took my comments out of context, he admitted to misunderstanding me and attacking me first (although that didn't slow his attacks down any). He may be alot of things, but judging from that, at least he's not a liar. How do you expect anyone to believe you in situations like DungBeetle, if you can't tell the truth about this? How do we know what else you lie about, or have lied about? Oh, I know, you'll deny these emails, and ever saying the things you've said. You have to cover yourself. And everyone will eat it up. Yet more proof that the people around here have not lost that 'Watchtower' mentality. The Watchtower taught us to have a co-dependent attitude, and that carries right over to places like this, and guys like you eat it right up. Some people can't snap out of it, they MUST follow, whether it be Ray Franz, Bill Bowen or Simon Green, they MUST follow. And with that comes blindness, not only must they follow, but they must eat up the lies and betrayals, and other forms of dishonesty, without even taking a minute to take notice that once again they're being screwed, but yet another man. So, go ahead Simon, deny these charges, deny you ever said these things, and make me out to be a liar. Don't worry one bit, most if not all will believe every word you say.
This is all about the two quotes at the start of this topic?! Gosh!
FYI: I have plenty of proof about a lot of things and do not idly throw accusations about - I have chosen though to be the 'bigger man' and let things drop a good many times. Yes, I could dash someone's credibility to pieces by posting their emails around but what would it accomplish other than hurting someone who obviously has some problems? As long as they stop hurting me then I am happy.
I do not want any "followers" and I don't think anyone blindly believes every word I say - I simply give my side of things when I think it matters and let people decide for themselves.
Now, all I can see you have accomplished with your outburst - you have shown that you are NOT discreet or trustworthy and for someone in such a potentially sensitive position (on the silentlambs site) I think this is a serious drawback.
I did not deactivate your account because I did not think it was fair to reply to you without you being able to reply back and if you don't want to post here ... well, just don't post! You really need me to do it for you?!
Also, I have edited the emails you posted because some of the information was private (apart form being irrelevant to the matter at hand). Nothing sinistare and I have not altered anything that you said. of course I am honest and clearly show when a post has been edited.
Edited by - Simon on 25 November 2002 12:56:23