Sanchy- Yahweh directly murdered children. If Yahweh exists, then he is evil, as per his own moral definition. I would want nothing to do with such an evil entity.
And he certainly gives you that choice.
by liam 129 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Sanchy- Yahweh directly murdered children. If Yahweh exists, then he is evil, as per his own moral definition. I would want nothing to do with such an evil entity.
And he certainly gives you that choice.
@SB: Gary Habernas' minimal facts are relatively easy to disprove. First you must agree that Jesus existed "as described" which many people don't. But even if you kind of say, sure there may have been a character like Jesus, you have to contend with these criticisms:
Jesus died by crucifixion
The disciples had experiences they believed were appearances of the risen Jesus
The disciples were transformed and willing to suffer and die for their belief
Paul, a skeptic and persecutor, converted after an experience he believed was of the risen Jesus
James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, converted after an experience of the risen Jesus
The tomb was found empty
"Matter produces information"
"Order comes from Chaos"
"Life comes from non-life"
"Personal comes from Non-Personal"
"Morality comes from Nothing"
"Reason comes from Non-reason"
Note that a lot of the things you describe as coming from 'nothing' naturally emerge in relatively (compared to nature) simple reinforcement learning algorithms which you can run on your computer 'today'. This is an area of study (what lay people currently consider to be "AI") which I've been involved with 15+ years now, but this has been well known for decades. Emergent behavior in substructures is really interesting and truly comes from natural selection of random distributions.
Halcon: We've established that God is both capable of giving eternal punishment and eternal reward
We both have accepted this as a given.
So, we have a god who designed a universe where people will always suffer. He himself understood this, as he noted that a lot of people would choose the path to destruction. He gave humanity a choice between bliss and suffering, knowing that many would choose suffering. He could have eliminated that choice and offered only bliss. Then, no one would suffer, which is something he claims to want.
So, even if we blame humans for their choices, we still exist in a universe where god knew that most would suffer. And they would suffer for all eternity. There will always be suffering in his universe, regardless of who we blame. Even if we take the step of absolving him for the failure of a population that he designed and created, we have a universe where there will always be suffering. It seems to me that he wants there to be suffering.
We do have the thorny issue of god allowing a condition to exist that is in direct opposition to what he claims to want. Thus, we must assume he is confused or lying. Neither of these is a bad thing, since we cannot judge him on human terms. They simply are. This also is not altered if we accept that his god is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient. He can be all of these things and still be beyond our notions of good and evil, so that his duplicity and desire for the suffering of others are true for him, yet not a good or bad thing.
We do have the thorny issue of god allowing a condition to exist that is in direct opposition to what he claims to want. Thus, we must assume he is confused or lying. Neither of these is a bad thing, since we cannot judge him on human terms. They simply are.
Unless the scriptures tell you he is confused or lying, then yes that is just as you stated, our own personal human assumption.
"They simply are" is correct. This is how it is. We'd like to modify the rules of God for all the reasons man is always repeating, but we can't. We will either move towards God or move away from him. He's told us he wants us to move towards him and more importantly, makes it possible.
Halcon - And he certainly gives you that choice.
His supposed options: Worship me (an evil entity), or don't and I'll destroy you
Halcon: Unless the scriptures tell you he is confused or lying
The scriptures tell me that he wishes for all to be saved. The scriptures also tell me that he acknowledges that many will not be saved. I think it's fair to say that the scriptures tell me he is confused or lying.
Do you agree that it is not wrong for god to be confused or lying, since he is above human standards of behavior?
His supposed options: Worship me (an evil entity), or don't and I'll destroy you.
As you said, you've chosen yours.
Tonus -I think it's fair to say that the scriptures tell me he is confused or lying. Do you agree that it is not wrong for god to be confused or lying, since he is above human standards of behavior?
Except his word never states that he is confused or lying about our salvation or punishment. 'confused and lying' is your limited human assessment, not God's.
Halcon: Except his word never states that he is confused or lying about our salvation or punishment.
One can infer this from what is being said and described. I assume that you take this same approach with Isaiah 45:7, for example.
Halcon: 'confused and lying' is your limited human assessment, not God's.
It's a reasonable assessment. Also, if we cannot know the mind of god, then it is presumptuous to claim that it is not his assessment as well. How do you know this?
Tonus -One can infer this from what is being said and described. I assume that you take this same approach with Isaiah 45:7, for example.
The verse in Isaiah reiterates what we've already agreed, that God is capable of both punishment and salvation. The fact that he creates opposites seems to equate to God being confused to you.
It's a reasonable assessment. Also, if we cannot know the mind of god, then it is presumptuous to claim that it is not his assessment as well. How do you know this?
We know at least what his word tells us. Clearly not everything we learn of him gives us a warm and fuzzy feeling. Many things are even unsettling. The creator of the Flood, nearly wiping out all of his human creation? The creator of something as terrible as hell? It's not for nothing that he refers to himself as a "fear inspiring God". In the mind of many he simply cannot be someone who incites both fear and love, and so they reject him.