Jason,
You started off badly here, whined yourself through the middle, and the less said about your last messages, the better.
First, you made an unspecified blanket accusation about "lies" on this site. When pressed for concrete examples, not to mention actual evidence, you resorted to whining. Your first posting presented the standard modus operandi of the braindead JW apologist. Naturally, you proved to be from their kindred-spirited opponents, the braindead fundie apologists. Big deal. From your other messages, it seems reasonable to assume you are a Christian protestant fundamentalist, Bible inerrantist, young earth creationist and totally convinced that the tiny little bit you know about the world is the absolute truth about everything. From this, it is also reasonable to assume that if you have any education at all, it did not teach you anything about source criticism, natural sciences or logic. Yet, naturally, you know everything.
When finally pressed for issues, you chose to present your assertion, so far only backed up by vague references to what a handful of Australian aboriginals told an antropologist more than 150 years ago, that dinosuars did (do?) coexist with humans. Of course, no evidence for this claim has been forthcoming, except the typical circular reference to your own speculative translation of a highly poetic book in the Bible.
When pressed further, you merely resort to copy and paste. Anyone can copy articles from a web page into a text box. Next time, post the link. We are able to click links. What is typical for these articles, are that they are written by people who do not know more about the subject at hand than you do, and that the paragraphs are full of technical-sounding jargon that says very little, and is totally void of technical facts (e.g. chemical analyses), quantitative evaluation of claims and real references. What you post is not references to science, it is religious apologetics dressed up in impressive sounding jargon to impress the ignorant.
Since most participants here on this forum are former or present (mostly non-believing) Jehovah's Witnesses, we know the tricks. We know how religionists misquote, misrepresent, lie and deceive to support preconceived opinions. We are, to put not a too fine point on it, not very impressed.
If you want to be treated as a serious participant here, it would help if you could say something in your own words, and make a logical argument supporting your position. You know, even from JWs it is expected that once they reach a certain age and level of "maturity", they are able to answer simple questions in their own words, without reading up the answer.
PS: You can find solid debunking of your creationist nonsense here: http://www.talkorigins.org/ You might learn something if you also read stuff that doesn't necessarily tickle your ear.
One example article from this site, a recent one, that directly rebuts your bold assertion about the The Geologic Column and its Implications for the Flood, can be read here: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/geocolumn/ It also contains a mention of your pal Woodmorappe towards the end. It is amusing to see how a self-styled expert in geology seems unable to even find a basic textbook in petroleum geology.
- Jan
--
Faith, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel. [Ambrose Bierce, The Devil´s Dictionary, 1911]
