Universalism is not true.
I don't know what you mean by "universalism" (where do you dear folks GET these words??), dear godrulz (again, peace to you!), but I do know, again, that you don't yet understand the love and mercy of Christ... nor what's written in the Bible.
We can forgive evil doers
Indeed, we SHOULD forgive evildoers... because Christ did. Even one that impaled alongside him. If he did it, then WE should do it as following in HIS footsteps. But since your comments indicate that, for you, the Bible is the "authority", why don't we consider what it says there?
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.'But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
but this is different than eternal destiny issues.
How so? Only ONE has been judged, thus far: the ruler of this world. NO ONE else has been judged. No one. And since WE are told to STOP judging, how can any of say what Judas' eternal destiny is? How can we even speak of such things? Joseph's brothers literally betrayed him, even sold him into slavery (a few of them literally wanted to kill him). Yet, he forgave them. Why? Because of HIS love for THEM... which SURPASSED their transgression as to HIM. You don't know what Judas' fate is, dear one, and those who say they do are lying. Indeed, it's not ever for us to consider, let alone speculate on. Why? Because it won't add or take away one cubit from OUR lifespans. All we should be concerned with, therefore, is whether WE are "walking" as WE should. Which includes forgiving others THEIR trespasses... AS we wish to be forgiven ours. The Law is a mirror, dear one, not a window.
It would be unwise to let a serial killer who does not repent on the loose.
It is not up to us, the Body of Christ, however, to see to such a matter. It is up to the "superior authorities," which is why the Most Holy One of Israel was established them: so that we DON'T have to judge. Such a person belongs to the world... and so it is up to the world to judge... and do with them as THEY will. Not us. The wisdom on OUR part, then, is to let such superior authorities do THEIR job, without interference FROM us. Otherwise, you're acting as part of the world. To his own master that evildoer will stand... or fall. That is what court systems, the agents of such authorities... are for.
(BTW - My personal position is that it would be unwise to let a serial killer on the loose... ... repentant or otherwise. I have absolutely NO problem forgiving such a person - I neither judge them, nor condemn them to eternal life. I have NO problem with them being called into the Body of Christ. I would welcome them as I would anyone else. BUT... I would also reason with them that, given the chance that their offenses could be repeated, say, in a moment of "weakness", etc., do THEY truly think it wise to live among society, with no chaperone/restraint? If they say, yes, sure... then so be it. Hopefully, though, their "repentance" is born out in their realization that perhaps they DO need chaperoning/some restraint, so that they do not HARM another. It truly wouldn't be about their "sin"... but the potential do harm again. I digress.).
We are in need of mercy and grace, but it is only extended to those who believe (Jn. 3:16 vs Jn. 3:36; those who love darkness and refuse to come to Him for life will perish; blanket forgiveness of everyone is not biblical).
That is not accurate because, again, God shows mercy to whomever HE wishes to show it. So, it is not "only" so extended, albeit primarily extended. Even so, I think you might want to research the Greek meaning of the words "believe" and "reject" and "refuse." Because I think that if you do you will find that (2) Judas believed Christ was the Son of God; (2) he did not reject him, as Christ OR as the Son of God... but betrayed him... which is NOT the same thing (and please remember, PETER outright denied him, which IS a rejection, and yet, was forgiven); and (3) he did not refuse to come to Christ when he was called and chosen to do so. He knew EXACTLY who my Lord was: the Son of God. He simply let his greed... and Satan... lead him to do the unthinkable. Is he eternally damned for that? I realize that you and many others would LOVE for that to be the case, but the TRUTH is that we do not KNOW. None of us. Not a one.
I also realize that you and others base this on your belief that Judas is "the son of destruction." I am not so sure, though, if what's written in the BIBLE is to be the "authority." Here's why:
In certain Bible versions my Lord is recorded to have said, at John 17:12:
NIV - While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled.
NLT - During my time here, I protected them by the power of the name you gave me. I guarded them so that not one was lost, except the one headed for destruction, as the Scriptures foretold.
In others, though:
NKJV - "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.
YLT - when I was with them in the world, I was keeping them in Thy name; those whom Thou hast given to me I did guard, and none of them was destroyed, except the son of the destruction, that the Writing may be fulfilled.
The GREEK, however, says: "son (huios, meaning son or descendant) of perdition (apoleia, meaning destroyer; destruction)". The Greek word "apoleia"... comes from the root word "apollymi", meaning to destroy, abolish, kill, perish, etc.).
Big deal, so what? So, the Destroyer... or Destruction... is Apollyon/Abaddon. Death. The king of the pit/abyss. And the SON of the Destroyer/Destruction... is not Judas. That son... is Belial... who is called "Satan" and "Devil"... who chose Death (the Destroyer) as his "father", rather than Life (the Most Holy One of Israel). Just like Christ is King over the LIVING, Apollyon is king... over the dead. (Revelation 9:11). And it is with his "father" that Belial (Satan) is eventually abyssed for a time. (Revelation 20:1-3)
And apparently I am not the only one to whom this truth has been revealed, because, according to Paul, the "son of perdition" (per most Bible versions and certainly the Greek) "will be REVEALED, he, the 'man of lawlessness'":
RSV - "Let no one deceive you in any way; for that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son ofperdition." 2 Thessalonians 2:3
Unfortunately, the NIV and NLT mistranslate this verse:
NIV - "Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for [that day will not come] until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction."
NLT - "Don't be fooled by what they say. For that day will not come until there is a great rebellion against God and the man of lawlessness is revealed-the one who brings destruction."
They DO this because their translators, rather than relying on HOLY SPIRIT to guide them, leaned upon their OWN understanding and ASSUMED that it was speaking of Judas, here. Thankfully, the footnote to the NLT version states: "Greek the son of destruction." Meaning, that it is the "son of destruction" who is spoken of here, as well. And since he is to be "revealed"... it cannot be Judas... as all pretty much know who HE is.
The fact that many BELIEVE John 17:12 refers to Judas does not necessarily make it so. Again, we will all have to wait and see. If, however, one is of the mind... as you appear to be... that what the BIBLE says is paramount, then there is NO way one can conclude that Judas is the one being referred to as "the son... of perdition (destruction)."
I hope this helps and, again, I bid you peace... and ears, if you wish them, to hear when the Spirit and the Bride say to YOU:
"Come! Take 'life's water'... the holy spirit of God, by which one can HEAR God, the Most Holy One of Israel, whose name is JAH... of Armies... SPEAK, through His Son and Christ, the Holy One of Israel and Holy Spirit, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah)... so as receive an ACCURATE knowledge as to all of these things and thus be led... into ALL truth... FREE!"
YOUR servant, as I am servant to ALL those of the Household of God, Israel, and those who go with, and a slave of Christ,
SA
P.S. Please forgive the light blue misformatting at the end; don't know what that's all about and couldn't correct. Peace!