An Old Argument.... does it hold water?

by AK - Jeff 1495 Replies latest jw experiences

  • bohm
    bohm

    Aguest:

    "I simply held up a mirror and said, "Okay, you're mad at God for what you think He did/doesn't do; why shouldn't folks be mad at YOU... for the SAME thing... especially if, as you say, there IS NO GOD? "

    wait a second, when a believer say: "your mad at god" to an atheist, isnt that more like flaunting an amazing ignorance rather than holding up a mirror? im confused...

    Are you just trying to troll and have a laugh, or do you really think atheists are mad at things which they do not think exist?

  • Qcmbr
    Qcmbr

    Much of mankind's efforts are to mitigate suffering and it is only the the last 200 odd years that we have had the means and tools to do so on an industrial scale. With modern knowledge and technology it is fair to say that in the advanced countries the so called curse of

    Adam ( to work by sweat to eat bread ) is over; with modern pain relief and medical procedures we can alleviate gods divine punishments and we can put off the point of death by many many years; technology is so empowering ( think how much your car and the Internet

    allows you to do ) that is seems highly unlikely that a return to the Garden of Eden, even with its nudity enticements, would be of any real interest - who would want to return to simply gardening? We've even managed to treat eat other more fairly ( womens rights ) and with

    less discrimination ( gender preference acceptance ) and - for those who wish to get cosy with gods racism ( go Israel - kill all other races babies and first born) we've even moved beyond that as we undo centuries of religion enforced racial prejudice.

    You tell that to the homeless (children included). You tell that to all the lost souls living in filth because of drugs. You tell that to all the abused children; abused wives; and yes, abused husbands as well. To the kids committing suicide. You tell that to the people who wouldn't even think about hiring someone with a turban on their head ( a terrorist in other words).

    You tell that to the people struggling day in and day out (the sweat of their brow) just to make ends meet and put food on the table. Low income/poverty line families. There are a lot of them. I used to be one. For a VERY long time. These people might not be ploughing the fields, but they're still working and eating by the sweat of their brow.

    I'm sorry Q. But I see a lot of suffering. Worse than that, in these first class worlds, I see a lot of people carrying about their lives as if these suffering people don't eXist. Or have brought it all on themselves. So interested in our own comforts/pleasures that we turn our heads and pretend the problem isn't there. Or that it is more minor than what it is. Or we blame them (the homeless, the drug addicts)... that way, hell, we don't even have to feel guilty about doing nothing or not caring.

    tec - normally i pride myself on not being petty so I regularly let your inability to even attemp to comprehend anything I post and to regularly misquote me slide, but tonight I, emboldened by a McDonald's cheeseburger and two, yes two apple pies, will luxuriate in responding (though I won't be anal enough to do it line by line like some unamed posters across these pAGes.)

    First and foremost it is a central plank of your own argument that we have the 'means and tools' to 'mitigate' (google it if its not in your vocab.)suffering.

    If you agree that the struggle to feed oneself is indeed a result of God's curse then you have eloquently proven post 1.

    You may have missed some other themes I touched upon - let me list them for your reading pleasure:

    • Modern medicine has reduced the effects of pain (indeed even your mentor takes pain relief so it is OK to agree here - you will not offend her).
    • We don't die - on average - as early as we used to , again largely due to the effects of the industrial revolution and modern technology.
    • Women's rights have been improved globally (but most rapidly in the West.)
    • Gender preference is becoming less of an issue as we become more tolerant.
    • Racial discrimination is reducing.
    • The Bible contains references to God acting as murderer or instigator of genocide, showing racial preference, cursing mankind with hardship and discriminating - especially against women.

    Now you did not make it clear which of those points you wanted me to pass on to people in difficult situations. However, giving you the benefit of the doubt and being able to read the context of your rant it seems you were merely replying to the 'sweat of brow' bit. Now before I go out and tell people your message I just want to be absolutely clear:

    Do you want me to tell them that the reason they are suffering is because - contrary to my assertion - God's curse is still in full effect and they are suffering a tough life because of him? You see my post talks about the reduction not cessation of suffering and I wouldnt want to sound like an ass.

    I will struggle to pass on messages to those who have committed suicide. That is probably AGs area as she talks to dead people.

    Do you want me to tell them that the industrial revolution, modern medicine and technology are not alleviating any of their suffering? If so I'll need you to provide me an alternate that must be pretty cool as I ask them to bin their medication, cars, food from the supermarket, clothing, electricity usage and hand back any welfare payments or food stamps society may have provided them and ask them to return to honest toil in the fields.

    Do the homeless people you want me to tell include those kicked out of their home by a vengeful god for eating fruit?

    I am aware that you see a lot of suffering, tragic I agree, but I must draw the line at saying it is worse that some people ignore it. Really? Ignoring child abuse is worse than actually suffering it? I will not press this point as I know you will be desperately wanting to get on with crafting a suitably grovelling apology but before you get to that I'd like to point out one last teeny point.

    People with turbans aren't terrorists. There may well be terrorists who wear turbans. Your statement above is incorrect and you shoulld probably retract it.

    :)

  • N.drew
    N.drew

    bohm, you are responding to a few words. The undercurrent of the thread is just what you say, it is ridiculous. You are right, but it is true that they have been spouting anger at the non-god.

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    Q makes good points in the last post. And if any human is charged with being guilty of not helping a fellow human when they could do so, then the argument is clearly over, for those ones agree that it is wrong to stand by when one could help.

  • undercover
    undercover

    "if any human is charged with being guilty of not helping a fellow human when they could do so, then the argument is clearly over, for those ones agree that it is wrong to stand by when one could help."

    Take Joe Paterno, for example. He's at the heart of a child abuse scandal. He's being forced to retire because he didn't do any more than he did in reporting a crime that happened. He didn't committ the crime. He didn't even witness it. But it was reported to him and he reported it to his bosses who then covered it up. He's catching it because, morally, he should have done more. He knew a crime was committed and he didn't follow through. Therefore, an outraged fanbase, alumni and nation have withdrawn support of him.

    Similarly, since God sees all the evil and has the power to do something, shouldn't he be held to a higher standard than what moral people hold a football coach to?

    If we're created in God's image and we are outraged at the goings on at Penn State, shouldn't we be even more outraged at God for his standing by and doing nothing?

  • bohm
    bohm

    Undercover:

    Joe Paterno was simply being concerned about the free will of the abused child and the abuser; i mean, a loving person would be concerned about free will, and if he stepped in and prevented this instance of evil, then clearly he would have to micro-manage every aspect of other peoples lifes, and hence no free will!

    So clearly letting the abuse go on day in and day out without raising a finger is the moral and loving thing to do.

  • undercover
    undercover

    bohm: Excellent!

    Where's Poopsie with her popcorn eating emoticon?

  • OnTheWayOut
  • still thinking
    still thinking

    but it is true that they have been spouting anger at the non-god.

    N.drew...there has been no anger spouted at a non god.

    Firstly, for those who don't believe in a god...they can't possibly spout anger at something that doesn't exist.

    And secondly, for those who are trying to have a conversation with people who do believe in a god, you have to speak/write as if the god exists otherwise you would be having two different conversations. Hence statements like..."if there is a god, why does he.....?'

    To be angered by what happens in the world and question believers as to why they think god allows it you have to show another side of what god could be doing, or in this case NOT doing.

    To say that god is watching suffering but doing nothing about it surely isn't a critisizim of you or any other believer, it is questioning why this is so, and how it can...if it is possible...be justified. What believers can't relate to is that their explanation is not good enough for a non believer, because for their explanation to make sense you have to want it to.

    From where I'm sitting, it would appear that from a non believers point of view they are being condemned by believers...they are not chosen, they do nothing to help the neady, they do nothing to help each other, they are responsible for everything. For a non belielever this really isn't an issue of saying that the 'world' is responsible...because that's what they already think. What is rude is the personal accusations of what such unbelievers aren't doing...when they aren't even known personally. Twice I have been asked what I do personally...what the hell has that got to do with the subject?

    From a believers point...they are condemed for believing in something imaginary, for having mental illness(which I find particularly distasteful), or for wishful thinking. Or worst of all condoning a jealous, vengeful god. That especially makes believers look pretty bad and pushes buttons because believers don't like to believe they could be supporting a vicious god. I am not a total non believer, so I can also relate to not wanting to believe that a god, that I still sort of believe in, could possibly be so uncaring.

    Neither of these understandings of believers or unbelievers is fair in my opinion. And actually has nothing to do with the question becuase no matter how we look at god or defend him or not we always end up blaming each other...and NOT how a loving GOD could allow such suffering, especially of children who DO NOT deserve it regardless of their fathers sins.

  • N.drew
    N.drew

    Thank you still thinking. It's a nice carefully worded post. I don't blame people. The problem is much to big to be blaming any person or even any country with it's government. I told you all it's gog's fault. Gog is to blame, I am not kidding. But world is to blame only because gog can be defeated but so far gog is not being defeated. That is why if a Christian says "what are you doing to resolve the problem" she is not too far off the truth. You see, it has become like Israel having mercy on the kings they had mercy on. It's all taking place in the spiritual place. The place between Earth and the Holy Place.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit