firstly the problem with the geneology differences is it brings the credibility of the authors. plain and simple, one or both must be liars, they both cant be correct. their intent is to decieve, thats all that can be said about it.
Really, that's all that can be said about it? So when someone is mistaken, does that make them a liar? Or when someone is told something that someone else is mistaken about, that makes them a liar as well.
There are more than just truth or liar aspects to this. And again, it has nothing to do with Christ and his teachings.
if someone starts a tale with a big downright lie, why believe anything else they say? either they have resoect for the truth, or they dont think much nof their audience.
This might be true, but this is not something you can state about the above.
lastly jesus message isnt that kind or good as what you think. there are numerous scriptures where he says some very horribnle things about causing division in families
Families did become divided when some chose to follow Him, and some chose not to. (That doesn't mean that those families remained divided, but some probably did). But what is your point here? People have always had free will to choose or not to choose. Note that he did not tell people to leave their families, or treat them with anything other than love.
, death and murder and racism.
I would like the scriptures that support Christ saying that he will cause death, murder, and racism, yes.
regardung the last take a look at the story of the woman with a problem mthat made her unclean.'the scripture and apostles are very much angry that a samaritizn womN dared to troubele jesus.
These are two different stories here. The 'unclean' woman was healed by her faith in Christ. She was also Israel.
The samaritan woman by the well was treated well by Christ. He spoke to her by the well, taught her, and revealed who he was to her.
It is a Caananite woman who you are speaking about above, and Christ ignored her since he was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel... however... he still granted her what she asked for. He was not angry in the least. In fact, it doesn't even show the apostles as being angry unless there is a different parallel passage other than Matthew that shows differently
is that really an example of goodness from jesus or the apsotles? think how many women iver the years were treated as durt, because jesus and the bible says women are below men to say it succinctly.
He never says that. His example shows that he thought much differently. Such as speaking to women as equal with men. Having female disciples. Revealing himself after his resurrection first to women. Teaching that Mary had chosen correctly to listen with the men, instead of doing the cooking and hostessing, when Martha complained about her sister not helping her. He said that Mary had chosen the better of the two and it would not be taken from her.
What men chose to twist and warp from his e x ample and teaching is on them, not Him.
Peace,
Tammy
