Ugh. bigmouth's posts made me sick.
So anyway, if an adult doesn't know how to treat a baby/child, doesn't know to not hit them, doesn't know how horrible it is, then he/she NEEDS to learn. There are so many alternatives to abusing children in order to stop "bad" behavior. Fear is not a good reason to hurt a child. There is NO good reason to hurt a kid, ever.
Why do we continue to allow abuse simply because it seems to stop behavior that we don't like? Because we can't reason with the child? If we can't reason (and we usually can, adults just don't learn how to), we must protect, not by hurting, but by setting physical boundaries for the kid/baby. If we can't, then the child should not be in that situation/area. Can't keep a kid out o the situation? You NEED to hit them? Someone else should be caring for the kid. We don't hit 3 month olds or the extremely mentally challeneged, yet they can get into trouble quickly and easily as well.Why? It's recognized as cruel and ineffective. Same thing for 3yearolds, 13 year olds, whoever. Same thing. Even when it seems effective, the consequences outway the benefits (and the benefits are rarely even real- abuse causes dishonest, fearful "obedience" more than real obedience anyway).
If anyone replies to this just to argue with me, I will not do so.