Like tec wrote, there's much merit in Jesus. Another thing I like is that he
and his followers took their faith from a 'centric law of a land with death
penalties to a better understanding of faith as such--to go among Jews and
Gentiles without giving offense, sacrificing of the self for others, etc.
It's a choice about faith. If you don't like it, it's like asking why someone
likes a song you don't like. They like a song (faith) beyond the math of the
music (the known things) and can't prove to you that you have to feel the same.
Done up nice, it can be a honey and can be a feeling of shared hope.
If it's a choice of interpretation, orthodox/conservative (defense of old text
writer) or liberal/progressive/reform (keep up to speed with the known God is
possible beyond and know people shouldn't harm people for a possibility/arbi-
trarilly), I recommend liberal/progressive reform. Whatever the historic or
linguistic argument of orthodox/conservative regarding the old text writer, if
there is a God, it wouldn't honor God to misinform or harm unneccesarily in His
name. In these ways, my Jesus is good. Like a non-believer, I reject the God
as defined by orthodox/conservative, but I also know there's more than that
interpretation that one believes in and the other rejects.
For a writer about some things about it I like Larry Hutado from the Univer-
sity of Edinburgh.
http://larryhurtado.wordpress.com/
http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/divinity/staff-profiles/hurtado
http://www.amazon.com/Lord-Jesus-Christ-Devotion-Christianity/dp/0802831672
http://www.amazon.com/How-Earth-Did-Jesus-Become/dp/0802828612/ref=pd_sim_b_1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_W._Hurtado