just because A promotes B doesn't mean that B can only exist because of A - simon
Quran (A) promotes Violence(B), therefore Violence (B) can only exist because of Quran (A).
You completely reversed what I said by changing "doesn't mean" to "therefore". That seems like a contrived attempt to make it look like I said something I didn't or am claiming that all violence is caused by the quran which of course would be idiotic.
To fit things to the example I gave the correct version would be:
"Just because the Quran (A) promotes Violence(B), doesn't mean that Violence (B) can only exist because of Quran (A)."
See how it makes complete sense when you get it right?
Would anyone argue with that statement?
Isn't that what you are suggesting? Decry the book and Muslim terrorism is cut off at the knees?
Stop laying the foundation for extremism by promoting hateful intollerance and teaching it to your children.
Otherwise don't be surprised if someone comes along and says to them "hey, we're making those things you've been taught about happen - come join us!"