by Simon 1524 Replies latest members adult
Which is it?
1) You are afraid of Muslims who believe and follow Islam (as you said in post 15569)
=You are afraid of all Muslims.
OR
1) A portion of the world's Muslims are Islamist
2) You are only afraid of Muslims who are Islamist (as you said in post 15570)
=You are not afraid of all Muslims
So it's "Muslims who believe and follow islam" vs "Muslims who are islamist"
Can you explain the difference to me so I'm clear what you're asking?
So it's "Muslims who believe and follow islam" vs "Muslims who are islamist"
Can you explain the difference to me so I'm clear what you're asking?
I have no idea what the difference is to you...You're the one who switched from one to the other. My last post was asking YOU for clarification.
Erm
Which is it?
1) You are afraid of Muslims who believe and follow Islam (as you said in post 15569)
=You are afraid of all Muslims.
1) A portion of the world's Muslims are Islamist
2) You are only afraid of Muslims who are Islamist (as you said in post 15570)
=You are not afraid of all Muslims
Which is it?
vs
I have no idea what the difference is to you...You're the one who switched from one to the other. My last post was asking YOU for clarification.
So you first insist I've said two different and opposite things and I'm to chose one or the other, then you say they are identical although you still think I "switched from one to the other" (?)
I don't know what your point is - do you?
Which is it:
is it option A
1) You are afraid of Muslims who believe and follow Islam (as you said in post 15569)
=You are afraid of all Muslims.
or option B
1) A portion of the world's Muslims are Islamist
2) You are only afraid of Muslims who are Islamist (as you said in post 15570)
=You are not afraid of all Muslims
"Who's on first?"
So it's "Muslims who believe and follow islam" vs "Muslims who are islamist"
Can you explain the difference to me so I'm clear what you're asking?
How about I say "Muslims who believe and follow islam who are islamist"
Does that make you ecstatically happy?
Can you explain the difference to me so I'm clear what you're asking?
I thought I could but I guess not! I tried.
then you say they are identical
I never said that.
Perhaps that is where the confusion is coming from, I don't know.
anyway, goodnight, Simon.
We have a situation here in Australia in the last two weeks articals in newspapers about Islamists which is unprecedented. In Australia we have just as many buddists as muslims about 500,000 of each but no buddist problems so far. Just a week ago in one raid 800 police were involved. So far no raids on Siks, buddists , hindues mormons , jehovahs witnesses or catholics. This constant bull that we have fanatics in every religion is just a lie
Can you people identify a problem I realise their is a majority of muslims that are peacefull but even 2% from 500,000 = 10,000 Jihadists running around is far too high. I remember reading an Israeli artical that estimated the number of Jihadists being about 10% so my 2% is much lower. I don't pretend to know the true figure
edited...misunderstood...
How about I say "Muslims who believe and follow islam who are islamist"
Does that make you ecstatically happy?
Kinda, yeah.
Goodnight!
